Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging rapidly indicates vessel regression in human squamous cell carcinomas grown in nude mice caused by VEGF receptor 2 blockade with DC101.

The purpose of our study was the investigation of early changes in tumor vascularization during antiangiogenic therapy with the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor 2 antibody (DC101) using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE MRI). Subcutaneous heterotransplants of human skin squamous cell carcinomas in nude mice were treated with DC101. Animals were examined before and repeatedly during 2 weeks of antiangiogenic treatment using Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic T1-weighted MRI. With a two-compartment model, dynamic data were parameterized in "amplitude" (increase of signal intensity relative to precontrast value) and k(ep) (exchange rate constant). Data obtained by MRI were validated by parallel examinations of histological sections immunostained for blood vessels (CD31). Already 2 days after the first DC101 application, a decrease of tumor vascularization was observed, which preceded a reduction of tumor volume. The difference between treated tumors and controls became prominent after 4 days, when amplitudes of treated tumors were decreased by 61% (P =.02). In line with change of microvessel density, the decrease in amplitudes was most pronounced in tumor centers. On day 7, the mean tumor volumes of treated (153 +/- 843 mm(3)) and control animals (596 +/- 384 mm(3)) were significantly different (P =.03). After 14 days, treated tumors showed further growth reduction (83 +/- 93 mm(3)), whereas untreated tumors (1208 +/- 822 mm(3)) continued to increase (P =.02). Our data underline the efficacy of DC101 as antiangiogenic treatment in human squamous cell carcinoma xenografts in nude mice and indicate DCE MRI as a valuable tool for early detection of treatment effects before changes in tumor volume become apparent.

[1]  Fabian Kiessling,et al.  Comparing Dynamic Parameters of Tumor Vascularization in Nude Mice Revealed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Contrast‐Enhanced Intermittent Power Doppler Sonography , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[2]  Robert C Brasch,et al.  Dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a surrogate marker of tumor response to anti‐angiogenic therapy in a xenograft model of glioblastoma multiforme , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  Weissleder,et al.  Approaches and agents for imaging the vascular system. , 1999, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[4]  J. Folkman,et al.  Angiogenesis-dependent diseases. , 2001, Seminars in oncology.

[5]  H. Lyng,et al.  Measurement of perfusion rate in human melanoma xenografts by contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  W. J. Lorenz,et al.  Pharmacokinetic Mapping of the Breast: A New Method for Dynamic MR Mammography , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  G Brix,et al.  Multicompartment analysis of gadolinium chelate kinetics: Blood‐tissue exchange in mammary tumors as monitored by dynamic MR imaging , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  G. van Kaick,et al.  Bone marrow microcirculation analysis in multiple myeloma by contrast‐enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging , 2001, International journal of cancer.

[9]  D Artemov,et al.  Vascular differences detected by MRI for metastatic versus nonmetastatic breast and prostate cancer xenografts. , 2001, Neoplasia.

[10]  J. Garlick,et al.  Tumor progression of skin carcinoma cells in vivo promoted by clonal selection, mutagenesis, and autocrine growth regulation by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. , 2001, The American journal of pathology.

[11]  D M Shames,et al.  MR imaging characterization of microvessels in experimental breast tumors by using a particulate contrast agent with histopathologic correlation. , 2001, Radiology.

[12]  Rakesh K. Jain,et al.  Normalizing tumor vasculature with anti-angiogenic therapy: A new paradigm for combination therapy , 2001, Nature Medicine.

[13]  A R Padhani,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI studies in oncology with an emphasis on quantification, validation and human studies. , 2001, Clinical radiology.

[14]  T. Helbich,et al.  Prostate cancer tumor grade differentiation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in the rat: comparison of macromolecular and small-molecular contrast media--preliminary experience. , 1999, Radiology.

[15]  J. Minna,et al.  Selective inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor 2 (KDR/Flk-1) activity by a monoclonal anti-VEGF antibody blocks tumor growth in mice. , 2000, Cancer research.

[16]  J. Folkman Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid and other disease , 1995, Nature Medicine.

[17]  M V Knopp,et al.  Angiogenic activity of cervical carcinoma: assessment by functional magnetic resonance imaging-based parameters and a histomorphological approach in correlation with disease outcome. , 1998, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[18]  J. Fox,et al.  The mouse in biomedical research. Volume III. Normative biology, immunology, and husbandry. , 1983 .

[19]  M. Neeman,et al.  Inhibition of neovascularization and tumor growth, and facilitation of wound repair, by halofuginone, an inhibitor of collagen type I synthesis. , 1999, Neoplasia.

[20]  S. Baruchel,et al.  Continuous low-dose therapy with vinblastine and VEGF receptor-2 antibody induces sustained tumor regression without overt toxicity. , 2000, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[21]  P. Agre,et al.  Aquaporins and the respiratory system: advice for a lung investigator. , 2000, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[22]  M. Décorps,et al.  Vessel size imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  G. Gasparini,et al.  Metronomic scheduling: the future of chemotherapy? , 2001, The Lancet. Oncology.

[24]  G. Neufeld,et al.  Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors , 1999, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[25]  L. Schad,et al.  Dynamic T1‐weighted monitoring of vascularization in human carcinoma heterotransplants by magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, International journal of cancer.

[26]  R Weissleder,et al.  Size optimization of synthetic graft copolymers for in vivo angiogenesis imaging. , 2001, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[27]  R. Kerbel Tumor angiogenesis: past, present and the near future. , 2000, Carcinogenesis.

[28]  M. Neeman,et al.  Neovascularization induced growth of implanted C6 glioma multicellular spheroids: magnetic resonance microimaging. , 1995, Cancer research.

[29]  L R Schad,et al.  Pharmacokinetic parameters in CNS Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging. , 1991, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[30]  N. Fusenig,et al.  Multiple stages and genetic alterations in immortalization, malignant transformation, and tumor progression of human skin keratinocytes , 1998, Molecular carcinogenesis.

[31]  F. Scappaticci Mechanisms and future directions for angiogenesis-based cancer therapies. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  Mihaela Skobe,et al.  Halting angiogenesis suppresses carcinoma cell invasion , 1997, Nature Medicine.

[33]  Alan Jackson,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oncology , 2005 .

[34]  S. Fox,et al.  Angiogenesis: pathological, prognostic, and growth-factor pathways and their link to trial design and anticancer drugs. , 2001, The Lancet. Oncology.

[35]  Fabian Kiessling,et al.  Sensitive noninvasive monitoring of tumor perfusion during antiangiogenic therapy by intermittent bolus-contrast power Doppler sonography. , 2003, Cancer research.

[36]  M. Bock,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Nude Mice With Heterotransplanted High-Grade Squamous Cell Carcinomas: Use of a Low-Loaded, Covalently Bound Gd-Hsa Conjugate as Contrast Agent With High Tumor Affinity , 2002, Investigative radiology.

[37]  N. van Bruggen,et al.  Assessing tumor angiogenesis using macromolecular MR imaging contrast media , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[38]  久場 敬司 HGF/NK4,a Four-Kringle Antagonist of Hepatocyte Growth Factor,Is an Angiogenesis Inhibitor that Suppresses Tumor Growth and Metastasis in Mice , 2001 .

[39]  M. Knopp,et al.  Cervical carcinoma: standard and pharmacokinetic analysis of time-intensity curves for assessment of tumor angiogenesis and patient survival. , 1999 .

[40]  P. Carmeliet,et al.  Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases , 2000, Nature.

[41]  M. Dewhirst,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging applications in the evaluation of tumor angiogenesis. , 2001, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[42]  K. Thomas Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, a Potent and Selective Angiogenic Agent (*) , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[43]  G. Yancopoulos,et al.  Vessel cooption, regression, and growth in tumors mediated by angiopoietins and VEGF. , 1999, Science.