Mechanical effects of tunneling on adjacent pipelines based on Galerkin solution and layered transfer matrix solution

Abstract The mechanical analysis of undercrossing tunneling on adjacent existing pipelines is an important challenge that geotechnical engineers may need to face when designing new excavation projects. A Galerkin solution and a layered transfer matrix solution for the tunnel–soil–pipeline interaction are given in order to compare the effects of soil stratifications on the pipeline behavior subjected to tunnel-induced soil movements. For the Galerkin solution, the soil is modeled by the modulus of subgrade reaction and the governing differential equations are converted to finite element equations using the Galerkin method. To take full consideration for non-homogeneous soil characteristics, a layered soil model is employed in the layered transfer matrix solution by applying the double Laplace transform and transfer matrix method. The differences between the two proposed solutions are verified with several examples including centrifuge modeling tests, finite difference numerical analysis and measured data in situ. Furthermore, the parametric analysis to existing pipelines in several representative layered soils in Shanghai is also carried out. The results discussed in this paper indicate that the Galerkin solution can estimate the pipeline mechanical behavior affected by tunneling in homogeneous soil with good precision. The layered transfer matrix solution is more suitable to simulate the soil stratifications on the pipeline behavior than the Galerkin solution.

[1]  Harry G. Poulos,et al.  Pile foundation analysis and design , 1980 .

[2]  H. Ishikawa,et al.  A method for linear elasto-static analysis of multi-layered axisymmetrical bodies using Hankel's transform , 2001 .

[3]  K. Soga,et al.  Estimating the Effects of Tunneling on Existing Pipelines , 2005 .

[4]  Isam Shahrour,et al.  Numerical analysis of the interaction between twin-tunnels: Influence of the relative position and construction procedure , 2008 .

[5]  Harvey J. Burd,et al.  Model testing of closely spaced tunnels in clay , 1998 .

[6]  F. Han Development of Novel Green’s Functions and Their Applications to Multiphase and Multilayered Structures , 2006 .

[7]  Assaf Klar,et al.  Centrifuge and discrete element modelling of tunnelling effects on pipelines , 2010 .

[8]  D. Burmister,et al.  The General Theory of Stresses and Displacements in Layered Soil Systems. II , 1945 .

[9]  A. B. Vesic,et al.  Bending of Beams Resting on Isotropic Elastic Solid , 1961 .

[10]  Assaf Klar,et al.  Tunneling effects on jointed pipelines , 2008 .

[11]  David M. Potts,et al.  Twin Tunnel Interaction: Surface and Subsurface Effects , 2001 .

[12]  E. Soliman,et al.  Two- and three-dimensional analysis of closely spaced double-tube tunnels , 1993 .

[13]  Assaf Klar,et al.  Tunneling beneath Buried Pipes: View of Soil Strain and Its Effect on Pipeline Behavior , 2010 .

[14]  C Sagaseta,et al.  ANALYSIS OF UNDRAINED SOIL DEFORMATION DUE TO GROUND LOSS , 1987 .

[15]  Assaf Klar,et al.  Elastoplastic Solution for Soil-Pipe-Tunnel Interaction , 2007 .

[16]  Robert J. Mair,et al.  Centrifuge modelling to investigate soil-structure interaction mechanisms resulting from tunnel construction beneath buried pipelines. , 2008 .

[17]  T. G. Davies,et al.  The displacement field due to a point load at the interface of a two layer elastic half-space , 1978 .

[18]  A. R. Selby,et al.  Soil Movements Induced by Tunnelling and Their Effects on Pipelines and Structures , 1986 .

[19]  David M. Potts,et al.  The Influence of Building weight on Tunnelling-Induced Ground and Building Deformation , 2004 .

[20]  Maosong Huang,et al.  Deformation analysis of tunnel excavation below existing pipelines in multi‐layered soils based on displacement controlled coupling numerical method , 2012 .

[21]  Michael Bevis,et al.  Surface deformation due to loading of a layered elastic half-space: a rapid numerical kernel based on a circular loading element , 2007 .

[22]  Jian-Fei Lu,et al.  Fundamental solution for a layered porous half space subject to a vertical point force or a point fluid source , 2005 .

[23]  Eunsu Sung,et al.  GROUND BEHAVIOR DUE TO TUNNEL EXCAVATION WITH EXISTING FOUNDATION , 2006 .

[24]  K. Soga,et al.  Centrifuge modelling of the effect of tunnelling on buried pipelines: mechanisms observed , 2005 .

[25]  Harry G. Poulos,et al.  Analytical Prediction for Tunneling-Induced Ground Movements in Clays , 1998 .

[26]  K. Y. Lo,et al.  Subsidence owing to tunnelling. I. Estimating the gap parameter , 1992 .

[27]  Z. Yue,et al.  Extended Sneddon and Muki solutions for multilayered elastic materials , 2002 .

[28]  S. W. Jacobsz,et al.  Centrifuge Modelling of Tunnelling Near Driven Piles , 2004 .

[29]  Teruo Nakai,et al.  Behavior of Ground and Response of Existing Foundation Due to Tunneling , 2011 .

[30]  K. Soga,et al.  Soil-pipe interaction due to tunnelling: comparison between Winkler and elastic continuum solutions , 2005 .

[31]  C.R.I. Clayton,et al.  Monitoring and displacements at Heathrow Express Terminal 4 station tunnels , 2006 .

[32]  C. Rogers,et al.  Movements in the Piccadilly Line tunnels due to the Heathrow Express construction , 2002 .

[33]  Sang-Duk Lee,et al.  Behavior of the ground in rectangularly crossed area due to tunnel excavation under the existing tunnel , 2006 .

[34]  M. Boscardin,et al.  Building Response to Excavation‐Induced Settlement , 1989 .

[35]  Harry G. Poulos,et al.  GROUND AND PILE-GROUP RESPONSES DUE TO TUNNELLING , 2001 .

[36]  J. R. Booker,et al.  Surface settlements due to deformation of a tunnel in an elastic half plane , 1996 .

[37]  Yukitoshi Fukahata,et al.  General expressions for internal deformation fields due to a dislocation source in a multilayered elastic half-space , 2005 .

[38]  Liu Shu-ya Field monitoring and numerical analysis of shield tunneling considering existing tunnels , 2009 .