Electromyographic studies of the lumbar trunk musculature during the generation of low‐level trunk acceleration

An understanding of how the support mechanisms of the spine behave during lifting may yield insight into the loading of the spine under occupational conditions and help shed light on the etiology of low‐back disorders. Previous controlled laboratory studies of spinal loadings have been limited to isometric and isokinetic conditions. To evaluate the behavior of the trunk during acceleration, we recorded intra‐abdominal pressure and trunk muscle activities during low‐level acceleration. Twenty subjects performed controlled accelerations of the trunk under different trunk loading conditions. Muscle activity decreased as acceleration increased; however, the rate of decrease differed among muscles (mean decrease, ⩽1% of maximum per 10°/s2 increase in acceleration), with the activity of the erector spinae muscles decreasing the most (1.88% of the maximum per 10°/s2 increase in acceleration). No changes in intra‐abdominal pressure were found as a function of acceleration. Relative coactivation of the muscles increased; however, this was a function of increases in trunk velocity and torque.

[1]  W S Marras,et al.  A Comprehensive Evaluation of Trunk Response to Asymmetric Trunk Motion , 1992, Spine.

[2]  G. Andersson,et al.  Quantitative electromyographic studies of back muscle activity relatated to posture and loading. , 1977, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[3]  G. Andersson,et al.  Quantitative Studies of Back Loads in Lifting , 1976 .

[4]  R. Norman,et al.  1986 Volvo Award in Biomechanics: Partitioning of the L4 - L5 Dynamic Moment into Disc, Ligamentous, and Muscular Components During Lifting , 1986, Spine.

[5]  W S Marras,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Motion Model of Loads on the Lumbar Spine: I. Model Structure , 1991, Human factors.

[6]  W S Marras,et al.  Muscle activities during asymmetric trunk angular accelerations , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[7]  A. Schultz,et al.  Analysis of Loads on the Lumbar Spine , 1981, Spine.

[8]  A. Schultz,et al.  Transmission of moments across the elbow joint and the lumbar spine. , 1979, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  M H Pope,et al.  Risk indicators in low back pain. , 1989, Annals of medicine.

[10]  D. Spengler,et al.  Back Injuries in Industry: A Retrospective Study: II. Injury Factors , 1986, Spine.

[11]  W S Marras,et al.  Measurements of Loads on the Lumbar Spine Under Isometric and Isokinetic Conditions , 1984, Spine.

[12]  J. Kelsey,et al.  An epidemiologic study of lifting and twisting on the job and risk for acute prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc , 1984, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[13]  W S Marras,et al.  A stochastic model of trunk muscle coactivation during trunk bending. , 1993, Spine.

[14]  W. Marras,et al.  Flexibility and velocity of the normal and impaired lumbar spine. , 1986, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  W. Marras,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Motion Model of Loads on the Lumbar Spine: II. Model Validation , 1991, Human factors.

[16]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Finite-Element Evaluation of Contact Loads on Facets of an L2-L3 Lumbar Segment in Complex Loads , 1991, Spine.

[17]  G. Andersson Epidemiologic Aspects on Low-Back Pain in Industry , 1981, Spine.

[18]  William S. Marras,et al.  Trunk motion during lifting: The relative cost , 1986 .

[19]  W. G. Allread,et al.  The Role of Dynamic Three-Dimensional Trunk Motion in Occupationally-Related Low Back Disorders: The Effects of Workplace Factors, Trunk Position, and Trunk Motion Characteristics on Risk of Injury , 1993, Spine.

[20]  R. F. Rushmer The nature of intraperitoneal and intrarectal pressures. , 1946, The American journal of physiology.