Exploring the Tradeoff between Performance and Overhead of the Relay Selection Mechanism in the Uniform Stress Routing Protocol

The constrained nature of Low power and Lossy Networks (LLNs) inevitably impacts fundamental networking tasks. The focus of our work is routing protocols, where the constraints of the network discourage the maintenance of large routing tables and the use of excessive control traffic, nonetheless optimizing for metrics such as delay and packet loss. In a previous work, we briefly introduced the Uniform Stress Routing protocol (USR), an approach inspired from the load distribution in trees. USR selects a limited set of relays at every node for all traffic forwarding, based on their ability to deliver traffic to the most solicited destinations, thus traffic directed to least solicited destinations will take suboptimal paths. This paper aims at further clarifying the concept of USR, then putting its performance to the test on Network Simulator 3. Experiments were conducted using the LR-WPAN module, and showed that USR allows a 13% decrease in control traffic, with no effect on the packet loss, but an increase in delays of 20%.

[1]  C. Mattheck,et al.  Shape Optimization of Engineering Components by Adaptive Biological Growth , 1991 .

[2]  Thomas H. Clausen,et al.  Depth-First Forwarding for Unreliable Networks: Extensions and Applications , 2015, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[3]  Charles J. Colbourn,et al.  Unit disk graphs , 1991, Discret. Math..

[4]  DresslerFalko,et al.  A survey on bio-inspired networking , 2010 .

[5]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing , 2001, RFC.

[6]  Thomas H. Clausen,et al.  LOADng: Towards AODV Version 2 , 2012, 2012 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall).

[7]  T. Tsvetkov RPL : IPv 6 Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks , 2010 .

[8]  Philip Levis,et al.  RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks , 2012, RFC.

[9]  Ken Sakamura,et al.  USR: Uniform stress routing protocol for constrained networks , 2016, 2016 IEEE 5th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics.

[10]  Thomas H. Clausen,et al.  A critical evaluation of the IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks (RPL) , 2011, 2011 IEEE 7th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob).

[11]  Andrzej Duda,et al.  Performance comparison of the RPL and LOADng routing protocols in a Home Automation scenario , 2013, 2013 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).

[12]  Luca Maria Gambardella,et al.  AntHocNet: An Ant-Based Hybrid Routing Algorithm for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks , 2004, PPSN.

[13]  Stephen Dawson-Haggerty,et al.  Overview of Existing Routing Protocols for Low Power and Lossy Networks , 2009 .

[14]  Janine M. Benyus,et al.  Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature , 1997 .

[15]  Lida Xu,et al.  The internet of things: a survey , 2014, Information Systems Frontiers.

[16]  Marco Dorigo,et al.  AntNet: Distributed Stigmergetic Control for Communications Networks , 1998, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[17]  C. Mattheck,et al.  THE KILL-OPTION: A POWERFUL METHOD TO PREPARE ENGINEERING LOW WEIGHT DESIGN PROPOSALS , 1992 .

[18]  Jp Vasseur Overview of Existing Routing Protocols for Low Power and Lossy Networks , 2007 .

[19]  Claus Mattheck,et al.  Design in Nature: Learning from Trees , 1998 .

[20]  Özgür B. Akan,et al.  A survey on bio-inspired networking , 2010, Comput. Networks.