Executive processes in appearance-reality tasks: the role of inhibition of attention and symbolic representation.

Two studies addressed the role of representation ability and control of attention on solutions to an appearance-reality task based on two types of objects, real and representational. In Study 1, 67 preschool children (3-, 4-, and 5-year-olds) solved appearance-reality problems and executive processing tasks. There was an interaction between object type (real vs. representational) and question type (appearance vs. reality) on problem difficulty. In addition, representational ability predicted performance on appearance questions and inhibitory control predicted performance on reality questions. In Study 2, 95 children (4- and 5-year-olds) who were monolingual or bilingual solved similar problems. On appearance questions, groups performed equivalently but on reality questions, bilinguals performed better (once language proficiency had been controlled). The difference is attributed to the advanced inhibitory control that comes with bilingualism.

[1]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Children's understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance-reality distinction. , 1988, Child development.

[2]  Karl S. Rosengren,et al.  The Credible Shrinking Room: Very Young Children's Performance With Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Relations , 1997 .

[3]  F. Happé The role of age and verbal ability in the theory of mind task performance of subjects with autism. , 1995, Child development.

[4]  P. Mitchell,et al.  Siblings in the development of executive control and a theory of mind , 2000 .

[5]  Josef Perner,et al.  Theory of mind and self-control: more than a common problem of inhibition. , 2002, Child development.

[6]  Jill de Villiers,et al.  Language and theory of mind: What are the developmental relationships? , 2000 .

[7]  John H. Flavell,et al.  Development of the appearance-reality distinction , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  Stephanie M. Carlson,et al.  How specific is the relation between executive function and theory of mind? Contributions of inhibitory control and working memory , 2002 .

[9]  J. Russell,et al.  Executive control within strategic deception: a window on early cognitive development? , 2001, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[10]  E. Bialystok Levels of bilingualism and levels of linguistic awareness. , 1988 .

[11]  Ellen Bialystok,et al.  Factors in the Growth of Linguistic Awareness. , 1986 .

[12]  H. Wellman,et al.  Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief. , 2001, Child development.

[13]  Ellen Bialystok,et al.  Notation to symbol: Development in children's understanding of print. , 2003, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[14]  J. Deloache Rapid change in the symbolic functioning of very young children. , 1987, Science.

[15]  Ellen Bialystok,et al.  Making concepts of print symbolic: understanding how writing represents language , 1995 .

[16]  Ellen Bialystok,et al.  Cardinal Limits: Evidence from Language Awareness and Bilingualism for Developing Concepts of Number. , 1997 .

[17]  L. Moses,et al.  The role of inhibitory processes in young children's difficulties with deception and false belief. , 1998, Child development.

[18]  D. Plaut,et al.  Representational development and theory-of-mind computations , 1993, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[19]  A. Luria The Working Brain , 1973 .

[20]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind” ? , 1985, Cognition.

[21]  J. Perner Understanding the Representational Mind , 1993 .

[22]  H. Wimmer,et al.  Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception , 1983, Cognition.

[23]  A. Whiten Machiavellian Intelligence II: The Machiavellian mindreader , 1997 .

[24]  K. Nelson,et al.  Structure and strategy in learning to talk. , 1973 .

[25]  Alison Gopnik,et al.  Theoretical explanations of children's understanding of the mind , 1991 .

[26]  A. Diamond Normal development of prefrontal cortex from birth to young adulthood: Cognitive functions, anatomy, and biochemistry. , 2002 .

[27]  A. Diamond,et al.  The relationship between cognition and action: performance of children 3 1 2 –7 years old on a stroop- like day-night test , 1994, Cognition.

[28]  Alison Gopnik,et al.  Theories of theories of mind: Theories and modules: creation myths, developmental realities, and Neurath's boat , 1996 .

[29]  J. Deloache Symbolic functioning in very young children: understanding of pictures and models. , 1991, Child development.

[30]  Claire Hughes,et al.  Executive function in preschoolers: Links with theory of mind and verbal ability , 1998 .

[31]  E. Bialystok,et al.  Effects of bilingualism and biliteracy on children's emerging concepts of print. , 1997, Developmental psychology.

[32]  K. Sullivan,et al.  Predicting and explaining behavior: a comparison of autistic, mentally retarded and normal children. , 1994, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[33]  Annette M. E. Henderson,et al.  Executive Function and False-Belief Understanding in Preschool Children: Two Tasks Are Harder Than One , 2003 .

[34]  K. Sullivan,et al.  Executive functions and performance on false belief tasks , 1997 .

[35]  J. Duncan Disorganisation of behaviour after frontal lobe damage , 1986 .

[36]  A. Diamond,et al.  Development of an aspect of executive control: development of the abilities to remember what I said and to "do as I say, not as I do". , 1996, Developmental psychobiology.

[37]  Paul L. Harris,et al.  Young Children's Understanding of Pretense , 1993 .

[38]  Ellen Bialystok,et al.  Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. , 2001 .

[39]  Chris Pratt,et al.  The development of children's theory of mind: The working memory explanation , 1995 .

[40]  Finding your marbles: does preschoolers' strategic behavior predict later understanding of mind? , 1998, Developmental psychology.

[41]  L. Moses,et al.  Individual differences in inhibitory control and children's theory of mind. , 2001, Child development.

[42]  A. Luria Higher Cortical Functions in Man , 1980, Springer US.

[43]  Ellen Bialystok,et al.  The relationship between bilingualism and the development of cognitive processes in problem solving , 1998, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[44]  S. Stoner Alternate Form Reliability of the Revised Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test for Head Start Children , 1981 .

[45]  Jakob Cromdal,et al.  Childhood bilingualism and metalinguistic skills: Analysis and control in young Swedish–English bilinguals , 1999, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[46]  E. Bialystok,et al.  Languages, scripts, and the environment: factors in developing concepts of print. , 2000, Developmental psychology.

[47]  E. Bialystok Letters, sounds, and symbols: Changes in children's understanding of written language , 1991 .

[48]  J. Astington,et al.  A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory-of-mind development. , 1999, Developmental psychology.

[49]  I. Baron Test of Everyday Attention for Children; The Thames Valley Test Company, Bury St. Edmunds, Suffolk, UK , 2001 .

[50]  A. Gopnik,et al.  The theory theory. , 1994 .

[51]  Douglas Frye,et al.  Theory of mind and rule-based reasoning , 1995 .