An interoperability standard for certified mail systems

A large number of certified mail systems have been put into operation on the market over the last years. In contrast to standard mailing systems like e-Mail, certified mail systems provide the secure, reliable and evidential exchange of messages with the quality of traditional postal registered or certified mail. Most of these systems are tailored to national laws, policies, needs and technical requirements and are thus closed and only accessible by certain user groups. However, the ongoing globalization and opening of the markets, especially in the European Union, ask for global certified mailing as already known from e-Mail. Interoperability of certified mail systems is a new and challenging research field. This article presents a framework and standard to make arbitrary certified mail systems interoperable. The presented approach uses a federated trust network of so-called electronic delivery gateways for seamless certified mailing across systems. This is achieved by converting protocols and system specifics on different layers using a harmonized interoperability protocol. The presented framework has been standardized by the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) as Registered Electronic Mail specification for interoperable certified mail systems.

[1]  Gianluca Ramunno,et al.  Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI); Provision of harmonized Trust-service status information , 2006 .

[2]  Arne Tauber,et al.  A survey of certified mail systems provided on the Internet , 2011, Comput. Secur..

[3]  Jens Dietrich,et al.  De-Mail — verschlüsselt, authentisch, nachweisbar , 2010, Datenschutz und Datensicherheit - DuD.

[4]  Herbert Leitold,et al.  STORK: Architecture, Implementation and Pilots , 2010, ISSE.

[5]  Keith Moore,et al.  An Extensible Message Format for Delivery Status Notifications , 1994 .

[6]  Eric Allman,et al.  SMTP Service Extension for Message Tracking , 2004, RFC.

[7]  Jose Antonio Onieva,et al.  Certified electronic mail: Properties revisited , 2010, Comput. Secur..

[8]  D. Box,et al.  Simple object access protocol (SOAP) 1.1 , 2000 .

[9]  Jörg Apitzsch,et al.  Mechanismen zur Nachweisbarkeit der Kommunikation bei OSCI Transport , 2007, Datenschutz und Datensicherheit - DuD.

[10]  Wilhelm Weisweber,et al.  Virtual Post Office in Practice , 2007, ISSE.

[11]  Rolf Oppliger,et al.  Providing Certified Mail Services on the Internet , 2007, IEEE Security & Privacy.

[12]  Jianying Zhou,et al.  An intensive survey of fair non-repudiation protocols , 2002, Comput. Commun..

[13]  Javier López,et al.  Multiparty nonrepudiation: A survey , 2009, CSUR.

[14]  João Melo,et al.  EPM: Tech, Biz and Postal Services Meeting Point , 2004, ISSE.

[15]  Arne Tauber,et al.  The SPOCS Interoperability Framework: Interoperability of eDocuments and eDelivery Systems taken as Example , 2010, ISSE.

[16]  Arne Tauber,et al.  Requirements and Properties of Qualified Electronic Delivery Systems in eGovernment: An Austrian Experience , 2010, Int. J. E Adopt..

[17]  Thomas Rössler,et al.  Interoperability Challenges for Pan-European Qualified Exchange of Electronic Documents , 2010 .

[18]  日本規格協会 情報技術-セキュリティ技術-情報セキュリティマネジメントシステム-要求事項 : 国際規格ISO/IEC 27001 = Information technology-Security techniques-Information security management systems-Requirements : ISO/IEC 27001 , 2005 .

[19]  Norbert Gronau,et al.  Software Services for e-Business and e-Society, 9th IFIP WG 6.1 Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society, I3E 2009, Nancy, France, September 23-25, 2009. Proceedings , 2009, I3E.