Klytaimestra Tyrannos: Fear and Tyranny in Aeschylus's Oresteia (with a Brief Comparison with Macbeth)

In the logic of tragedy, Clytemnestra represents the distorted anti-model in regard to gender-role and political behavior. In contrast to male, just kingship, she establishes a tyranny, together with her lover Aegisthus, after killing Agamemnon. But haunted by fears from the very beginning of the Oresteia , she attempts to calm down the negative forces. First she orders sacrifices all over the city to placate the gods. In a brutal logic she devises the revenge on her returning husband. Acting as Erinys herself, her desire to shed blood is greater than rational restraint. After the horrible deed, the chorus, changing his voice and attitude, starts a collective protest against the new ruler. Clytemnestra claims that as long as Aegisthus inflames the fire in the house, fear will stay away from it. But soon she desires to sign a treaty with the Erinys who now seeks revenge on her. Therefore she restrains her lover from violence against the people of Argos, conscious of the mechanism of Erinys. But her attempts to push the fears away are in vain. In the beginning of Choephori she is haunted by terrible nightmares. Again she recurs to placating libations, now directed to the eidolon of Agamemnon. All her strategies, in words and actions, rhetoric and ritual, are bound to fail. Her terrible dream will turn out real, providing the imagery on scene: the dragon sucking her breast will turn out to be Orestes. The ritual remains ineffective, since the agents, the chorus of the libation-bearers together with Electra, reverse the goal of their action. Entangled in fears, she must fall in her new tyrannical power. Only in the last part of the trilogy, the role of fear will be redirected against the enemies according to a new polis ideology. The contribution concludes with a brief comparative remark on Macbeth , since both Aeschylus and Shakespeare focus on the precarious state of the tyrant's power and on its subconscious basis.

[1]  Anton Bierl.  Momente performativen Selbstreflexiv-Werdens in der Tragödie des Aischylos (mit besonderem Blick auf die Dareios-Szene in den Persern) , 2019, Forum Modernes Theater.

[2]  S. Bigliazzi.  Linguistic Taboos and the "Unscene" of Fear in Macbeth* , 2018 .

[3]  G. Ugolini.  Φόβος φυτεύει τύραννον: The Tyrant's Fears on the Attic Tragic Stage , 2017 .

[4]  N. Slater.  Voice and Voices in Antiquity , 2016 .

[5]  A. Bierl.  Melizein Pathe or the Tonal Dimension in Aeschylus’ Agamemnon: Voice, Song, and Choreia as Leitmotifs and Metatragic Signals for Expressing Suffering , 2016 .

[6]  Charles Martindale,et al.  Shakespeare and the Classics , 2011 .

[7]  J. Collins.  Studies in Shakespeare , 2007 .

[8]  B. Seidensticker,et al.  Blutvergießen am Altar: Zur Ritualisierung der Gewalt im griechischen Opferkult , 2006 .

[9]  M. Silk.  Shakespeare and the Classics: Shakespeare and Greek tragedy: strange relationship , 2004 .

[10]  S. Orgel.  Macbeth and the Antic Round , 1999 .

[11]  D. Olson,et al.  Blood and Iron: Stories and Storytelling in Homer's Odyssey , 1995 .

[12]  W. Burkert.  Greek Religion: Archaic and Classical , 1991 .

[13]  Louise Schleiner.  Latinized Greek Drama in Shakespeare's Writing of "Hamlet" , 1990 .

[14]  L. Jepsen.  Ethical Aspects of Tragedy: A Comparison of Certain Tragedies by Aeschylus, Sophocles, Euripides, Seneca, and Shakespeare , 1971 .

[15]  W. Burkert.  Greek Tragedy and Sacrificial Ritual , 1966 .

[16]  Gordon Braden.  Classical Greek Tragedy and Shakespeare , 2017 .

[17]  E. Showerman.  of Shakespeare’s Greater Greek , 2015 .

[18]  Anton Bierl.  Dionysos auf der Bühne : gattungsspezifische Aspekte des Theatergottes in Tragödie, Satyrspiel und Komödie , 2011 .

[19]  A. Bierl.  Ritual and performativity : the chorus in old comedy , 2009 .

[20]  S. Goldhill,et al.  Sophocles and the Greek tragic tradition , 2009 .

[21]  C. Pelling.  Seeing a Roman tragedy through Greek eyes: Shakespeare's Julius Caesar , 2009 .

[22]  Fiona Macintosh.  Agamemnon in performance, 458 BC to AD 2004 , 2005 .

[23]  S. Goldhill.  Aeschylus: The Oresteia: The Oresteia , 2004 .

[24]  M. McGrail.  Tyranny in Shakespeare , 2001 .

[25]  Albert Henrichs.  Drama and Dromena: Bloodshed, Violence, and Sacrificial Metaphor in Euripides , 2000 .

[26]  Lutz Käppel.  Die Konstruktion der Handlung in der Orestie des Aischylos : die Makrostruktur des 'Plot' als Sinnträger in der Darstellung des Geschlechterfluchs , 1998 .

[27]  A. Bonnafé.  Marylin A. Katz, Penelope's Renown. Meaning and Indeterminacy in the Odyssey , 1993 .

[28]  Anton Bierl.  Dionysos und die griechische Tragödie : politische und "metatheatralische" Aspekte im Text , 1991 .

[29]  Adrian Poole.  Tragedy: Shakespeare and the Greek Example , 1987 .

[30]  M. Davies,et al.  Poetarum elegiacorum testimonia et fragmenta , 1981 .

[31]  A. F. Garvie,et al.  Aeschyli septem quae supersunt tragoedias , 1974 .

[32]  E. Voigt,et al.  Sappho et Alcaeus : fragmenta , 1971 .

[33]  Froma I. Zeitlin.  Postscript to Sacrificial Imagery in the Oresteia (Ag. 1235-37) , 1966 .

[34]  Froma I. Zeitlin.  The Motif of the Corrupted Sacrifice in Aeschylus' Oresteia , 1965 .