The SISMA prototype system: integrating Geophysical Modeling and Earth Observation for time-dependent seismic hazard assessment

An innovative approach to seismic hazard assessment is illustrated that, based on the available knowledge of the physical properties of the Earth structure and of seismic sources, on geodetic observations, as well as on the geophysical forward modeling, allows for a time-dependent definition of the seismic input. According to the proposed approach, a fully formalized system integrating Earth Observation data and new advanced methods in seismological and geophysical data analysis is currently under development in the framework of the Pilot Project SISMA, funded by the Italian Space Agency. The synergic use of geodetic Earth Observation data (EO) and Geophysical Forward Modeling deformation maps at the national scale complements the space- and time-dependent information provided by real-time monitoring of seismic flow (performed by means of the earthquake prediction algorithms CN and M8S) and permits the identification and routine updating of alerted areas. At the local spatial scale (tens of km) of the seismogenic nodes identified by pattern-recognition analysis, both GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) and SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) techniques, coupled with expressly developed models for interseismic phase, allow us to retrieve the deformation style and stress evolution within the seismogenic areas. The displacement fields obtained from EO data provide the input for the geophysical modeling, which eventually permits to indicate whether a specific fault is in a “critical state.” The scenarios of expected ground motion (shakemaps) associated with the alerted areas are then defined by means of full waveforms modeling, based on the possibility to compute synthetic seismograms by the modal summation technique (neo-deterministic hazard assessment). In this way, a set of deterministic scenarios of ground motion, which refer to the time interval when a strong event is likely to occur within the alerted area, can be defined both at national and at local scale. The considered integrated approach opens new routes in understanding the dynamics of fault zones as well as in modeling the expected ground motion. The SISMA system, in fact, provides tools for establishing warning criteria based on deterministic and rigorous forward geophysical models and hence allows for a well-controlled real-time prospective testing and validation of the proposed methodology over the Italian territory. The proposed approach complements the traditional probabilistic approach for seismic hazard estimates, since it supplies routinely updated information useful in assigning priorities for timely mitigation actions and hence it is particularly relevant to Civil Defense purposes.

[1]  M. Crosetto,et al.  Subsidence monitoring using SAR interferometry: Reduction of the atmospheric effects using stochastic filtering , 2002 .

[2]  John G. Anderson,et al.  Benefits of the use of precariously balanced rocks and other fragile geological features for testing the predictions of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis , 2011 .

[3]  Mark D. Petersen,et al.  Comparison of the Historical Record of Earthquake Hazard with Seismic- Hazard Models for New Zealand and the Continental United States , 2006 .

[4]  Vladimir Kossobokov,et al.  TESTING EARTHQUAKE PREDICTION ALGORITHMS : STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT ADVANCE PREDICTION OF THE LARGEST EARTHQUAKES IN THE CIRCUM-PACIFIC, 1992-1997 , 1999 .

[5]  K. Priestley,et al.  FOCAL DEPTHS OF MODERATE AND LARGE SIZE EARTHQUAKES IN IRAN , 2002 .

[6]  Jens-Uwe Klügel,et al.  Comment on “Why Do Modern Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Analyses Often Lead to Increased Hazard Estimates?” by Julian J. Bommer and Norman A. Abrahamson , 2007 .

[7]  R. Basili,et al.  The Database of Individual Seismogenic Sources (DISS), version 3: Summarizing 20 years of research on Italy's earthquake geology , 2008 .

[8]  Giuliano F. Panza,et al.  Correlation between macroseismic intensities and seismic ground motion parameters , 1997 .

[9]  O. Novikova,et al.  Performance of the earthquake prediction algorithm CN in 22 regions of the world , 1999 .

[10]  F. Vaccari,et al.  Neo-Deterministic Seismic Hazard and Pattern Recognition Techniques: Time-Dependent Scenarios for North-Eastern Italy , 2011 .

[11]  F. Vaccari,et al.  Neo-Deterministic and Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessments: a Comparison over the Italian Territory , 2011 .

[12]  Giorgio Franceschetti,et al.  The September 26, 1997 Colfiorito, Italy, earthquakes: Modeled coseismic surface displacement from SAR interferometry and GPS , 1999 .

[13]  M. Crosetto,et al.  Early detection and in-depth analysis of deformation phenomena by radar interferometry , 2005 .

[14]  M. Crosetto,et al.  Two Radar Interferometric Approaches to Monitor Slow and Fast Land Deformation , 2007 .

[15]  A. Gusev Broadband Kinematic Stochastic Simulation of an Earthquake Source: a Refined Procedure for Application in Seismic Hazard Studies , 2011 .

[16]  S. Constable,et al.  Occam's inversion to generate smooth, two-dimensional models from magnetotelluric data , 1990 .

[17]  P. Rosen,et al.  SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR INTERFEROMETRY TO MEASURE EARTH'S SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY AND ITS DEFORMATION , 2000 .

[18]  Dimova Silvia,et al.  An earthquake scenario for the microzonation of Sofia and the vulnerability of structures designed by use of the Eurocodes , 2007 .

[19]  Giuliano F. Panza,et al.  Seismic wave propagation in laterally heterogeneous anelastic media: Theory and applications to seismic zonation , 2001 .

[20]  Silvia Dimova,et al.  Corrigendum to “An earthquake scenario for the microzonation of Sofia and the vulnerability of structures designed by use of the Eurocodes”: [Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 27 (2007) 1028–1041] , 2007 .

[21]  A. A. Soloviev,et al.  Nonlinear dynamics of the lithosphere and earthquake prediction , 2003 .

[22]  Riccardo E. M. Riva,et al.  GPS monitoring and earthquake prediction: A success story towards a useful integration , 2009 .

[23]  G. Panza,et al.  Coupling geophysical modelling and geodesy to unravel the physics of active faults , 2008, 2008 Second Workshop on Use of Remote Sensing Techniques for Monitoring Volcanoes and Seismogenic Areas.

[24]  Massimiliano Stucchi,et al.  A seismic source zone model for the seismic hazard assessment of the Italian territory , 2008 .

[25]  L. Abruzzese,et al.  La Rete Integrata Nazionale GPS (RING) dell' INGV: una infrastruttura aperta per la ricerca scientifica , 2006 .

[26]  G. Panza,et al.  Viscoelastic relaxation and long‐lasting after‐slip following the 1997 Umbria‐Marche (Central Italy) earthquakes , 2007 .

[27]  Zhenming Wang,et al.  Comment on “Why Do Modern Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Analyses Often Lead to Increased Hazard Estimates?” by Julian J. Bommer and Norman A. Abrahamson , 2007 .

[28]  A. Marotta,et al.  Block model versus thermomechanical model: new insights on the present-day regional deformation in the surroundings of the Calabrian Arc , 2010 .

[29]  G. Panza,et al.  Identification of seismogenic nodes in the Alps and Dinarides , 2004 .

[30]  A. Marotta,et al.  Africa-Eurasia kinematics control of long-wavelength tectonic deformation in the Central Mediterranean , 2008 .

[31]  Kojiro Irikura,et al.  Advanced Seismic Hazard Assessment , 2011 .

[32]  M. Crosetto,et al.  First evidences of fast creeping on a long-lasting quiescent earthquake normal-fault in the Mediterranean , 2009 .

[33]  Vladimir Kossobokov,et al.  Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program Maps Are Misleading , 2010 .

[34]  G. Panza,et al.  Postseismic deformation following the 1997 Umbria‐Marche (Italy) moderate normal faulting earthquakes , 2003 .

[35]  Alexander A. Gusev,et al.  Broadband Simulation of Earthquake Ground Motion by a Spectrum-Matching, Multiple-Pulse Technique , 2009 .

[36]  R. Goldstein,et al.  Mapping small elevation changes over large areas: Differential radar interferometry , 1989 .

[37]  Vladimir Kossobokov,et al.  Intermediate-term middle-range earthquake predictions in Italy: a review , 2005 .

[38]  Bruno Crippa,et al.  Exploitation of high‐density DInSAR data points of the Umbria‐Marche (Italy) 1997 seismic sequence for fault characteristics , 2007 .

[39]  Gerassimos A. Papadopoulos,et al.  OPERATIONAL EARTHQUAKE FORECASTING. State of Knowledge and Guidelines for Utilization , 2011 .