Manipulating nanoscale features on the surface of dye-loaded microbubbles to increase their ultrasound-modulated fluorescence output.

The nanoscale surface features of lipid-coated microbubbles can dramatically affect how the lipids interact with one another as the microbubble diameter expands and contracts under the influence of ultrasound. During microbubble manufacturing, the different lipid shell species naturally partition forming concentrated lipid islands. In this study the dynamics of how these nanoscale islands accommodate the expansion of the microbubbles are monitored by measuring the fluorescence intensity changes that occur as self-quenching lipophilic dye molecules embedded in the lipid layer change their distance from one another. It was found that when the dye molecules were concentrated in islands, less than 5% of the microbubbles displayed measurable fluorescence intensity modulation indicating the islands were not able to expand sufficiently for the dye molecules to separate from one another. When the microbubbles were heated and cooled rapidly through the lipid transition temperature the islands were melted creating an even distribution of dye about the surface. This resulted in over 50% of the microbubbles displaying the fluorescence-modulated signal indicating that the dye molecules could now separate sufficiently to change their self-quenching efficiency. The separation of the surface lipids in these different formations has significant implications for microbubble development as ultrasound and optical contrast agents.

[1]  Nico de Jong,et al.  High-speed photography during ultrasound illustrates potential therapeutic applications of microbubbles. , 2005, Medical physics.

[2]  H. Umakoshi,et al.  Calcein permeation across phosphatidylcholine bilayer membrane: effects of membrane fluidity, liposome size, and immobilization. , 2009, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[3]  Arjen Amelink,et al.  Optical biopsy of breast tissue using differential path-length spectroscopy , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  P. Dayton,et al.  Threshold of fragmentation for ultrasonic contrast agents. , 2001, Journal of biomedical optics.

[5]  Sadik C Esener,et al.  Characterization of individual ultrasound microbubble dynamics with a light-scattering system. , 2011, Journal of biomedical optics.

[6]  M. Borden,et al.  Lipid monolayer dilatational mechanics during microbubble gas exchange , 2012 .

[7]  Mark Borden,et al.  Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery. , 2007, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[8]  D. Boturyn,et al.  In vivo optical imaging of integrin αV-β3 in mice using multivalent or monovalent cRGD targeting vectors , 2007, Molecular Cancer.

[9]  F Forsberg,et al.  Ultrasound contrast agents: a review. , 1994, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[10]  Sadik C Esener,et al.  Phospholipid/Carbocyanine Dye-Shelled Microbubbles as Ultrasound-Modulated Fluorescent Contrast Agents. , 2013, Soft matter.

[11]  Detlef Lohse,et al.  Brandaris 128: A digital 25 million frames per second camera with 128 highly sensitive frames , 2003 .

[12]  David Needham,et al.  Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Polycrystalline Phospholipid Monolayer Shells: Novel Solid Microparticles , 2003 .

[13]  Rolf A. Brekken,et al.  Monitoring Response to Anticancer Therapy by Targeting Microbubbles to Tumor Vasculature , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[14]  W. Law,et al.  Synthesis of cRGD-peptide conjugated near-infrared CdTe/ZnSe core-shell quantum dots for in vivo cancer targeting and imaging. , 2010, Chemical communications.

[15]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Lateral phase separation in lipid-coated microbubbles. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[16]  Raymond F. Chen,et al.  Mechanism of fluorescence concentration quenching of carboxyfluorescein in liposomes: energy transfer to nonfluorescent dimers. , 1988, Analytical biochemistry.

[17]  Paul A. Dayton,et al.  Optical observation of lipid- and polymer-shelled ultrasound microbubble contrast agents , 2004 .

[18]  Jameel A Feshitan,et al.  Microbubble size isolation by differential centrifugation. , 2009, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[19]  P Vaupel,et al.  Oxygenation of human tumors: evaluation of tissue oxygen distribution in breast cancers by computerized O2 tension measurements. , 1991, Cancer research.

[20]  M. Longo,et al.  Surface phase behavior and microstructure of lipid/PEG-emulsifier monolayer-coated microbubbles. , 2004, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[21]  J. Fujimoto Optical coherence tomography for ultrahigh resolution in vivo imaging , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[22]  C. Zanelli,et al.  Beamforming for therapy with high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) using quantitative schlieren , 1993 .

[23]  David Cosgrove,et al.  Ultrasound contrast agents: an overview. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[24]  J. Riess,et al.  Injectable microbubbles as contrast agents for diagnostic ultrasound imaging: the key role of perfluorochemicals. , 2003, Angewandte Chemie.