Transforming European Water Governance? Participation and River Basin Management under the EU Water Framework Directive in 13 Member States

The European Union (EU) Water Framework Directive (WFD) requires EU member states to produce and implement river basin management plans, which are to be designed and updated via participatory processes that inform, consult with, and actively involve all interested stakeholders. The assumption of the European Commission is that stakeholder participation, and institutional adaptation and procedural innovation to facilitate it, are essential to the effectiveness of river basin planning and, ultimately, the environmental impact of the Directive. We analyzed official documents and the WFD literature to compare implementation of the Directive in EU member states in the initial WFD planning phase (2000–2009). Examining the development of participatory approaches to river basin management planning, we consider the extent of transformation in EU water governance over the period. Employing a mixed quantitative and qualitative approach, we map the implementation “trajectories” of 13 member states, and then provide a detailed examination of shifts in river basin planning and participation in four member states (Germany, Sweden, Poland and France) to illustrate the diversity of institutional approaches observed. We identify a general tendency towards increased, yet circumscribed, stakeholder participation in river basin management in the member states examined, alongside clear continuities in terms of their respective pre-WFD institutional and procedural arrangements. Overall, the WFD has driven a highly uneven shift to river basin-level planning among the member states, and instigated a range of efforts to institutionalize stakeholder involvement—often through the establishment of advisory groups to bring organized stakeholders into the planning process.

[1]  Nicolas W. Jager.  Transboundary Cooperation in European Water Governance - A set-theoretic analysis of International River Basins , 2016 .

[2]  K. Blackstock,et al.  How does legacy create sticking points for environmental management? Insights from challenges to implementation of the ecosystem approach , 2015 .

[3]  Christina Cook,et al.  Negotiating Water Governance: Why the Politics of Scale Matter , 2015 .

[4]  Seanna L. Davidson,et al.  The Watershed Approach: Challenges, Antecedents, and the Transition from Technical Tool to Governance Unit , 2015 .

[5]  T. Moss,et al.  The politics of multi-scalar action in river basin management: Implementing the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) , 2015 .

[6]  J. Gupta,et al.  Global water governance and river basin organisations , 2014 .

[7]  Constanze Haug,et al.  Learning effects of interactive decision-making processes for climate change adaptation , 2014 .

[8]  Jens Newig,et al.  What Role for Public Participation in Implementing the EU Floods Directive? A comparison with the Water Framework Directive, early evidence from Germany, and a research agenda , 2014 .

[9]  J. Newig,et al.  Cross-level information and influence in mandated participatory planning: Alternative pathways to sustainable water management in Germany's implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive , 2014 .

[10]  D. Benson,et al.  Evaluating participation in WFD river basin management in England and Wales: Processes, communities, outputs and outcomes , 2014 .

[11]  Gunnar Jónsson,et al.  Prospects for learning in river management: exploring the initial implementation of the Water Framework Directive in a Swedish river basin , 2014 .

[12]  C. Harteveld,et al.  Contrasting stories on overcoming governance challenges: the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive in the Netherlands , 2014 .

[13]  J. Newig,et al.  Multi-level governance, policy implementation and participation: the EU's mandated participatory planning approach to implementing environmental policy , 2014 .

[14]  J. Heijden,et al.  Coping with Mandated Public Participation: The Case of Implementing the EU Water Framework Directive in the Netherlands , 2013 .

[15]  D. Liefferink,et al.  The marathon of the hare and the tortoise: implementing the EU Water Framework Directive , 2013 .

[16]  L. Slavíková,et al.  Institutional Evolution in Water Management in the Czech Republic and Poland , 2013 .

[17]  G. Gooch,et al.  IWRM in the Swedish Context: A Voluntary Move to IWRM Principles or a Legal Necessity to Comply with the European Union Water Framework Directive? , 2013 .

[18]  D. Benson,et al.  Integrating the Principles of Integrated Water Resources Management? River Basin Planning in England and Wales , 2013 .

[19]  I. Theesfeld,et al.  Germany’s Light Version of Integrated Water Resources Management , 2013 .

[20]  D. Huitema,et al.  Mainstreaming Climate Policy: The Case of Climate Adaptation and the Implementation of EU Water Policy , 2013 .

[21]  Anders Branth Pedersen,et al.  How different institutional arrangements promote integrated river basin management. Evidence from the Baltic Sea Region , 2013 .

[22]  A. V. Buuren,et al.  Integrated Water Resources Management in the Netherlands. Historical Trends and Current Practices in the Governance of Integration , 2013 .

[23]  Eskild Holm Nielsen,et al.  BETWEEN GOVERNANCE AND GOVERNMENT: DANISH EIA IN UNCHARTED WATERS , 2012 .

[24]  Daniel P. Loucks,et al.  Evaluating participation in water resource management: A review , 2012 .

[25]  K. Hogl,et al.  Environmental Governance: The Challenge of Legitimacy and Effectiveness , 2012 .

[26]  L. D. Stefano,et al.  Water planning and management after the EU Water Framework Directive , 2012 .

[27]  Jens Newig,et al.  Participation in Environmental Governance: Legitimate and Effective? , 2012 .

[28]  Claas Meyer,et al.  Institutional change in water management collaboration: implementing the European Water Framework Directive in the German Odra river basin , 2012 .

[29]  T. Moss,et al.  Spatial Fit, from Panacea to Practice: Implementing the EU Water Framework Directive , 2012 .

[30]  J. Heijden,et al.  The Mechanics of Virtue: Lessons on Public Participation from Implementing the Water Framework Directive in the Netherlands , 2012 .

[31]  Nikolaos Voulvoulis,et al.  Implementing the Water Framework Directive: a transition from established monitoring networks in England and Wales , 2012 .

[32]  F. Cabezas.  The European Water Framework Directive: A Framework? , 2012 .

[33]  J. Behagel,et al.  The politics of democratic governance : the implementation of the Water Framework Directive in the Netherlands , 2012 .

[34]  J. Behagel,et al.  What Institutions Do: Grasping Participatory Practices in the Water Framework Directive , 2012 .

[35]  J. Jarsjö,et al.  Impact of the European Water Framework Directive on local-level water management : Case study Oxunda Catchment, Sweden , 2012 .

[36]  O. Fritsch,et al.  Operationalising active involvement in the EU Water Framework Directive: Why, when and how? , 2011 .

[37]  D. Liefferink,et al.  The EU Water Framework Directive: A multi-dimensional analysis of implementation and domestic impact , 2011 .

[38]  Democratic Legitimacy in the Implementation of the Water Framework Directive in the Netherlands: Towards Participatory and Deliberative Norms? , 2011 .

[39]  Alberto Garrido,et al.  Beyond universal remedies for good water governance: a political and contextual approach HElEN INgRAM , 2011 .

[40]  J. Jílková,et al.  Implementing the Public Participation Principle into Water Management in the Czech Republic: A Critical Analysis , 2011 .

[41]  REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL , 2011 .

[42]  Olivier Graefe.  River basins as new environmental regions? The depolitization of water management , 2011 .

[43]  Alberto Garrido,et al.  Water for food in a changing world , 2011 .

[44]  N. Hernández-Mora,et al.  Public participation and the role of social networks in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive in Spain , 2011 .

[45]  Selam Petersson.  Experiences of uncertainty : Case study of the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive in Sweden , 2011 .

[46]  Carel Dieperink,et al.  Uncertainty management strategies: Lessons from the regional implementation of the Water Framework Directive in the Netherlands , 2011 .

[47]  U. Mörtberg,et al.  Governance of Water Resources in the Phase of Change: A Case Study of the Implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive in Sweden , 2011, AMBIO.

[48]  K. Clive Thompson,et al.  Chapter 2.5:Implementing the Water Framework Directive: Lessons for the Second Planning Cycle , 2010 .

[49]  Thomas C. Beierle.  Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions , 2010 .

[50]  Antje Bruns.  Governance im Küstenraum : europäische Umweltpolitik im Wandel ; die Umsetzung des Integrierten Küstenzonenmanagements und der Wasserrahmenrichtlinie an der Westküste Schleswig-Holsteins , 2010 .

[51]  The EC Water Framework Directive and monitoring lakes in the Republic of Ireland , 2010 .

[52]  B. Jacobsen,et al.  Combining active farmer involvement with detailed farm data in Denmark: a promising method for achieving water framework directive targets? , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[53]  A. Dubgaard,et al.  Participation in the water framework directive in the UK and Denmark:meaningful or tokenistic? , 2010 .

[54]  H. V. Rijswick,et al.  European River Basin Districts: Are They Swimming in the Same Implementation Pool? , 2010 .

[55]  F. Roca,et al.  The Water Framework Directive observatory: an assessment of the WFD implementation process in Spain , 2010 .

[56]  Hugh Deeming,et al.  Beyond bureaucracy? Assessing Institutional Change in the Governance of Water in England and Wales , 2009 .

[57]  K. Gee,et al.  From State-Centered Decision-Making to Participatory Governance – Planning for Offshore Wind Farms and Implementation of the Water Framework Directive in Northern Germany , 2009 .

[58]  François Molle,et al.  River-basin planning and management: the social life of a concept , 2009 .

[59]  F. Cernesson,et al.  I-Five: Innovative Instruments and institutions in implementing the water framework directive French case study report: implementing the WFD on the Thau basin , 2009 .

[60]  Lost in Translation : The Participatory Imperative and Local Water Governance in North Thailand and Southwest Germany , 2009 .

[61]  T. Leinweber.  Umsetzung der EU-Wasserrahmenrichtlinie in Deutschland , 2009 .

[62]  S. Meijerink,et al.  River Basin Management in Europe: The ‘Up- and Downloading’ of a New Policy Discourse , 2009 .

[63]  Grace Glasgow,et al.  NORTH–SOUTH COORDINATION IN IRELAND'S INTERNATIONAL RIVER BASIN DISTRICTS , 2009, Biology and Environment: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy.

[64]  K. Irvine,et al.  PROGRESS ON STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE IN THE REPUBLIC OF IRELAND , 2022, Biology and Environment: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy.

[65]  A. Lagendijk,et al.  The Disoriented State: Shifts In Governmentality, Territoriality and Governance , 2009 .

[66]  W. Howarth,et al.  Aspirations and Realities Under the Water Framework Directive: Proceduralisation, Participation and Practicalities , 2009 .

[67]  Mark Wiering,et al.  Dealing with Complexity and Policy Discretion: A comparison of the implementation process of the European Water Framework Directive in five member states , 2009 .

[68]  A. Hunka.  Towards communicative river management in Poland , 2009 .

[69]  J. Newig,et al.  Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level - and effective? , 2009 .

[70]  Paul Jeffrey,et al.  Deconstructing public participation in the Water Framework Directive: implementation and compliance with the letter or with the spirit of the law? , 2008 .

[71]  David Robert Woods.  Stakeholder involvement and public participation: a critique of Water Framework Directive arrangements in the United Kingdom , 2008 .

[72]  B. Hedelin,et al.  Implementing the EU Water Framework Directive – prospects for sustainable water planning in Sweden , 2008 .

[73]  Brian S. McIntosh,et al.  Synthesis, part of a Special Feature on New Methods for Adaptive Water Management From Premise to Practice: a Critical Assessment of Integrated Water Resources Management and Adaptive Management Approaches in the Water Sector , 2008 .

[74]  Odd Iglebaek,et al.  Nordregio – Nordic Centre for Spatial Development , 2008 .

[75]  Antonio A. R. Ioris,et al.  Water institutional reforms in Scotland: Contested objectives and hidden disputes , 2008 .

[76]  M. Reed.  Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review , 2008 .

[77]  E. Louka.  Water Management in the European Union , 2008 .

[78]  R. Earle,et al.  Master plan for water framework directive activities in Ireland leading to River Basin Management Plans , 2008 .

[79]  Frank Ewert,et al.  Regional Farm Diversity Can Reduce Vulnerability of Food Production to Climate Change , 2008 .

[80]  J. Newig,et al.  Will participation foster the successful implementation of the water framework directive? The case of agricultural groundwater protection in northwest Germany , 2008 .

[81]  Edella Schlager,et al.  Embracing Watershed Politics , 2008 .

[82]  François Molle,et al.  Nirvana concepts, narratives and policy models : insights from the water sector , 2008 .

[83]  R. Meinzen-Dick.  Beyond panaceas in water institutions , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[84]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Social Learning and Water Resources Management , 2007 .

[85]  Kirsty Blackstock,et al.  Evaluating stakeholder involvement in river basin planning: a Scottish case study , 2007 .

[86]  J. Newig,et al.  The Water Framework Directive and agricultural nitrate pollution: will great expectations in Brussels be dashed in Lower Saxony? , 2007 .

[87]  Ray Ison,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Social Learning in Water Resources Management Illuminating the Possibilities for Social Learning in the Management of Scotland's Water , 2007 .

[88]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Social Learning in Water Resources Management Social Learning in European River-Basin Management: Barriers and Fostering Mechanisms from 10 River Basins , 2007 .

[89]  José Montoya-Hidalgo.  Instruments of Public Participation in Aragon Water Policy: The Aragon Water Commission , 2007 .

[90]  Jeanie Bukowski,et al.  Spanish Water Policy and the National Hydrological Plan: An Advocacy Coalition Approach to Policy Change , 2007 .

[91]  K. Veidemane,et al.  The Water Framework Directive in the Baltic Sea Region Countries : Vertical implementation, horizontal integration and transnational cooperation , 2007 .

[92]  J. Newig.  Does public participation in environmental decisions lead to improved environmental quality?: towards an analytical framework , 2007 .

[93]  Archon Fung.  Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance , 2006 .

[94]  David King,et al.  Involving stakeholders in integrated river basin planning in England and Wales , 2006 .

[95]  A. Dinar,et al.  Institutional and Policy Analysis of River Basin Management: The Warta River Basin, Poland , 2005 .

[96]  Jens Newig.  Die Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung nach der EG-Wasserrahmenrichtlinie , 2005 .

[97]  B. Hedelin.  Potential Implications of the EU Water Framework Directive in Sweden : A Comparison of the Swedish municipalities' Current Water Planning Regime with the Requirements of the EU's New Water Framework Directive , 2005 .

[98]  Lennart J. Lundqvist,et al.  Integrating Swedish water resource management: a multi-level governance trilemma , 2004 .

[99]  Anna Vári.  Hungarian Experiences with Public Participation in Water Management , 2004 .

[100]  M. McGarrigle,et al.  Keeping pristine lakes clean: Loughs Conn and Mask, western Ireland , 1999, Hydrobiologia.

[101]  Maria Kaika,et al.  The EU water framework directive: Part 2. Policy innovation and the shifting choreography of governance , 2003 .

[102]  A. Barreira,et al.  The Participatory Regime of Water Governance in the Iberian Peninsula , 2003 .

[103]  L. Kröger,et al.  Can policy learning really improve implementation? Evidence from Irish responses to the Water Framework Directive , 2003 .

[104]  A. Mol,et al.  Participation and Environmental Governance: Consensus, Ambivalence and Debate , 2003, Environmental Values.

[105]  Bert Enserink,et al.  Information Management for Public Participation in Co-design Processes: Evaluation of a Dutch Example , 2003 .

[106]  L. F. Wiggers-Rust.  Country Reports: The Netherlands , 2003, European Energy and Environmental Law Review.

[107]  M. Kaika.  The Water Framework Directive: A New Directive for a Changing Social, Political and Economic European Framework , 2003 .

[108]  J. Bongaerts.  European Water Law: Water Policy and Water Resources Management in France: The Projet de Loi Sur l'Eau , 2002, European Energy and Environmental Law Review.

[109]  Liesbet Hooghe,et al.  Types of Multi-Level Governance , 2002 .

[110]  D. Grimeaud.  Reforming EU Water Law: Towards Sustainability? , 2001, European Energy and Environmental Law Review.

[111]  Christoph Knill,et al.  Implementing EU Environmental Policy : New Directions and Old Problems , 2000 .

[112]  F. M. Cate.  River Basin Management in Lower and Upper Austria: Beginnings and Future Prospects , 1999 .

[113]  H. Blöch,et al.  The European Union Water Framework Directive: Taking European Water Policy into the Next Millennium , 1999 .

[114]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Evolution of EU water policy: a critical assessment and a hopeful perspective , 1999 .

[115]  C. Folke,et al.  The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions , 2007 .

[116]  A. Vari,et al.  Public participation in developing water quality legislation and regulation in Hungary , 1998 .

[117]  Karl Tombre,et al.  GENERAL CONCLUSIONS , 1967, GREC.