A Novel Data Segmentation-Based Approach for Validating the Narrowband Radar Data by the Feature Selective Validation Method

More and more electromagnetics analyses need more detailed-level data validation technologies, which can focus on the specific data region. The feature selective validation (FSV) method is a key electromagnetics validation tool, which was adopted in 2008 as the core of 1597.1 standard for validation of computational electromagnetics computer modeling and simulations. However, despite its successful performance for electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) data, it still comes to apply to the validation of narrowband radar data, which, differing from EMC data, is quite problematic. For this reason, this paper proposes a novel approach, which is called segment FSV (S-FSV), to deal with the narrowband radar data. This approach divides the data into several segments, extracts the peak and oscillation regions, allocates an individual importance degree to each segment, and generates validation results for all segments. Finally, the efficiency and feasibility of the proposed approach is corroborated by the statistical results in a narrowband radar data survey. The proposed S-FSV approach is shown to outperform the traditional FSV one in reflecting the expert opinions and to be more suitable for validation of such data.

[1]  A. Orlandi,et al.  Feature selective validation (FSV) for validation of computational electromagnetics (CEM). part II- assessment of FSV performance , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[2]  Alistair Duffy,et al.  Analysis of techniques to compare complex data sets , 2002 .

[3]  Gang Zhang,et al.  Analyzing Transient Phenomena in the Time Domain Using the Feature Selective Validation (FSV) Method , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[4]  K. S. Thyagarajan,et al.  Still Image And Video Compression With Matlab , 2017 .

[5]  Christer Larsson Near to far field transformation of RCS using a compressive sensing method , 2016, AMTA 2016 Proceedings.

[6]  Takuji Arima,et al.  Accuracy investigation of 2-D near-field far-field transformation for RCS measurement using 2.5-D targets , 2016, 2016 International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (ISAP).

[7]  Patrice Pajusco,et al.  RCS modeling and measurements for automotive radar applications in the W band , 2017, 2017 11th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP).

[8]  Jia Liu,et al.  An efficient ray‐tracing method for RCS prediction in greco , 2013 .

[9]  M. J. Schuh,et al.  EM programmer's notebook-benchmark plate radar targets for the validation of computational electroma , 1992 .

[10]  Alistair Duffy,et al.  Method for determining region boundaries for transient data comparison using Feature Selective Validation (FSV) , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC).

[11]  Yann Le Bihan,et al.  Statistical Approach for Nondestructive Incipient Crack Detection and Characterization Using Kullback-Leibler Divergence , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[12]  Shui-Rong Chai,et al.  A new method combining compressive sensing and method of moments for bistatic scattering problems , 2015, 2015 Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference (APMC).

[13]  Ilkka Laakso,et al.  Edge- or Face-Based Electric Field in FDTD: Implications for Dosimetry , 2011 .

[14]  Elif Derya Übeyli,et al.  Wavelet transform feature extraction from human PPG, ECG, and EEG signal responses to ELF PEMF exposures: A pilot study , 2008, Digit. Signal Process..

[15]  A. Orlandi,et al.  Feature selective validation (FSV) for validation of computational electromagnetics (CEM). part I-the FSV method , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[16]  Antonio Orlandi,et al.  Comparison of Three-Dimensional Datasets by Using the Generalized n-Dimensional ( n-D) Feature Selective Validation (FSV) Technique , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[17]  Lixin Wang,et al.  Improvement in the Definition of ODM for FSV , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[18]  Qun Zhang,et al.  Narrowband Radar Imaging and Scaling for Space Targets , 2017, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[19]  Antonio Orlandi,et al.  Review of the Feature Selective Validation Method (FSV). Part I—Theory , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[20]  Nicolas Pinel,et al.  Rough Surface RCS Measurements and Simulations Using the Physical Optics Approximation , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[21]  Antonio Orlandi,et al.  The influence of data density on the consistency of performance of the feature selective validation (FSV) technique. , 2006 .

[22]  Antonio Orlandi,et al.  Downsampled and Undersampled Datasets in Feature Selective Validation (FSV) , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[23]  Ning Fang,et al.  RCS Uncertainty Quantification Using the Feature Selective Validation Method , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.