Pharmacodynamic Relationships in Nonclinical Tumor Models: A Case Study of Orally Available Novel Inhibitors of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase AUTHORS:

The orally available novel small molecules PF06463922 [(10R)-7-amino-12-fluoro-2,10,16-trimethyl-15-oxo-10,15,16,17-tetrahydro-2H-8,4-(metheno)pyrazolo[4,3-h][2,5,11]benzoxadiazacyclotetradecine-3-carbonitrile] and PF06471402 [(10R)-7-amino-12-fluoro-2,10,16-trimethyl-15-oxo-10,15,16,17-tetrahydro-2H-8,4-(azeno)pyrazolo[4,3-h][2,5,11]benzoxadiazacyclo-tetradecine-3-carbonitrile] are second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors targeted to both naïve and resistant patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to the first-generation ALK inhibitor, crizotinib. The objectives of the present study were to characterize and compare the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) relationships of PF06463922 and PF06471402 for target modulation in tumor and antitumor efficacy in athymic mice implanted with H3122 NSCLC cells expressing a crizotinib-resistant echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)-ALK mutation, EML4-ALKL1196M. Furthermore, the PKPD relationships for these ALK inhibitors were evaluated and compared between oral administration and subcutaneous constant infusion (i.e., between different pharmacokinetic [PK] profiles). Oral and subcutaneous PK profiles of these ALK inhibitors were adequately described by a one-compartment PK model. An indirect response model extended with a modulator fit the time courses of PF06463922- and PF06471402-mediated target modulation (i.e., ALK phosphorylation) with an estimated unbound EC50,in vivo of 36 and 20 nM, respectively, for oral administration, and 100 and 69 nM, respectively, for subcutaneous infusion. A drug-disease model based on the turnover concept fit tumor growth curves inhibited by PF06463922 and PF06471402 with estimated unbound tumor stasis concentrations of 51 and 27 nM, respectively, for oral administration, and 116 and 70 nM, respectively, for subcutaneous infusion. Thus, the EC50,in vivo to EC60,in vivo estimates for ALK inhibition corresponded to the concentrations required tumor stasis in all cases, suggesting that the pharmacodynamic relationships of target modulation to antitumor efficacy were consistent among the ALK inhibitors, even when the PK profiles with different administration routes were considerably different.

[1]  Paolo Vicini,et al.  Translational Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling for an Orally Available Novel Inhibitor of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase and c-Ros Oncogene 1 , 2014, The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[2]  P. Vicini,et al.  Translation of Anticancer Efficacy From Nonclinical Models to the Clinic , 2014, CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology.

[3]  Wei Liu,et al.  Discovery of (10R)-7-amino-12-fluoro-2,10,16-trimethyl-15-oxo-10,15,16,17-tetrahydro-2H-8,4-(metheno)pyrazolo[4,3-h][2,5,11]-benzoxadiazacyclotetradecine-3-carbonitrile (PF-06463922), a macrocyclic inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) with preclinical brain expos , 2014, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[4]  Huichun Zhu,et al.  Discovery of (10R)-7-Amino-12-Fluoro-2,10,16-Trimethyl-15-Oxo-10,15,16,17-Tetrahydro-2H-8,4-(Metheno)Pyrazolo[4,3-H][2,5,11]Benzoxadiazacyclotetradecine-3-Carbonitrile (Pf-06463922), a Macrocyclic Inhibitor of Alk/Ros1 with Pre-Clinical Brain Exposure and Broad Spectrum Potency Against Alk-Resistant , 2014 .

[5]  C. Gridelli,et al.  ALK inhibitors in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. , 2014, Cancer treatment reviews.

[6]  F. André,et al.  The genetic complexity of common cancers and the promise of personalized medicine: is there any hope? , 2014, The Journal of pathology.

[7]  Sergei L Timofeevski,et al.  Abstract A277: PF-06463922, a novel ROS1/ALK inhibitor, demonstrates sub-nanomolar potency against oncogenic ROS1 fusions and capable of blocking the resistant ROS1G2032R mutant in preclinical tumor models. , 2013 .

[8]  Funda Meric-Bernstam,et al.  Building a personalized medicine infrastructure at a major cancer center. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  R. Rosell,et al.  Adaptive resistance to targeted therapies in cancer. , 2013, Translational lung cancer research.

[10]  S. Yamazaki Translational Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling from Nonclinical to Clinical Development: A Case Study of Anticancer Drug, Crizotinib , 2013, The AAPS Journal.

[11]  A. Rossi,et al.  ALK inhibitors: a new targeted therapy in the treatment of advanced NSCLC , 2013, Targeted Oncology.

[12]  P. Jänne,et al.  EGFR-mutated oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer: current trends and future prospects. , 2012, Cancer treatment reviews.

[13]  Paolo Vicini,et al.  Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Crizotinib for Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibition and Antitumor Efficacy in Human Tumor Xenograft Mouse Models , 2012, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[14]  Young Lim Choi,et al.  EML4-ALK mutations in lung cancer that confer resistance to ALK inhibitors. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  J. Lee,et al.  Dose Escalation Methods in Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials , 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[16]  A. Harris,et al.  Phase I Study of the Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor, AG014699, in Combination with Temozolomide in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[17]  Shinji Yamazaki,et al.  Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Biomarker Response and Tumor Growth Inhibition to an Orally Available cMet Kinase Inhibitor in Human Tumor Xenograft Mouse Models , 2008, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[18]  Vikram Sinha,et al.  Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and the stages of drug development: Role of modeling and simulation , 2005, The AAPS Journal.

[19]  Jeffrey W. Clark,et al.  Trends in the Use and Role of Biomarkers in Phase I Oncology Trials , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[20]  William Pao,et al.  Prospective Assessment of Discontinuation and Reinitiation of Erlotinib or Gefitinib in Patients with Acquired Resistance to Erlotinib or Gefitinib Followed by the Addition of Everolimus , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[21]  Mats O. Karlsson,et al.  Assessment of Actual Significance Levels for Covariate Effects in NONMEM , 2001, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.

[22]  Johan Gabrielsson,et al.  Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Data Analysis: Concepts and Applications , 2002 .

[23]  Hartmut Derendorf,et al.  Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling in Drug Research and Development , 2000, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[24]  L. Lesko,et al.  Optimizing the Science of Drug Development: Opportunities for Better Candidate Selection and Accelerated Evaluation in Humans , 2000, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[25]  W J Jusko,et al.  Precursor-dependent indirect pharmacodynamic response model for tolerance and rebound phenomena. , 1998, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[26]  W J Jusko,et al.  Physiologic indirect response models characterize diverse types of pharmacodynamic effects , 1994, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[27]  L B Sheiner,et al.  Simultaneous modeling of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: application to d-tubocurarine. , 1980, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.