The specific objectives of this research were to quantify the effects of certain environmental factors on the relative strength loss of soil–cement subjected to compaction delay and to develop a numerical tool that can be easily used by engineers and contractors for determining a maximum compaction delay time for a given project. These objectives were addressed through extensive laboratory work and statistical analyses. The laboratory work involved testing an aggregate base material and a subgrade soil, each treated with two levels of cement. Environmental factors included in the experimentation were wind speed, air temperature, and relative humidity; three levels of each factor were evaluated in combination with three compaction delay times. The primary response variables in this research were relative compaction and relative strength. The findings indicate that relative strength is sensitive to variability among the selected independent variables within the ranges investigated in this research, while relative compaction is not. Inferring relative strength from relative density is therefore not a reliable approach on soil–cement projects. Consistent with theory, higher wind speed, higher air temperature, lower relative humidity, and higher compaction delay time generally result in lower relative strength. With the nomographs developed in this research, the maximum delay time permitted for compaction of either a base or subgrade material similar to those tested in this research can be calculated. Knowing in advance how much time is available for working the soil–cement will help contractors schedule their activities more appropriately and ultimately produce higher-quality roads.
[1]
Ara Arman,et al.
The Effect of Delayed Compaction of Stabilized Soil-Cement
,
1967
.
[2]
W. Guthrie,et al.
Effect of Remolding on Cement-Stabilized Base Course Blended with Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
,
2009
.
[3]
M. M. Kilgo,et al.
The Statistical Sleuth: A Course in Methods of Data Analysis
,
1998
.
[4]
C. Benson,et al.
Use of class C fly ash for stabilization of soft subgrade
,
2003
.
[5]
Bruce G. Terrell,et al.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
,
2020,
Federal Regulatory Guide.
[6]
Scott M. Mackiewicz,et al.
Stabilization of Soil with Self-Cementing Coal Ashes
,
2005
.
[7]
W. Spencer Guthrie,et al.
Variability in Construction of Cement-Treated Base Layers
,
2010
.
[8]
Lynne H Irwin,et al.
EFFECTS OF COMPACTION DELAYS AND MULTIPLE TREATMENTS ON THE STRENGTH OF CEMENT STABILIZED SOIL
,
1979
.
[9]
Yang H. Huang,et al.
Pavement Analysis and Design
,
1997
.
[10]
G. Ferguson,et al.
Use of Self-Cementing Fly Ashes as a Soil Stabilization Agent
,
1993
.
[11]
Jan Carmeliet,et al.
Pedestrian Wind Environment around Buildings: Literature Review and Practical Examples
,
2004
.
[12]
Stephen Sebesta,et al.
Use of Microcracking to Reduce Shrinkage Cracking in Cement-Treated Bases
,
2005
.