Modern Engineering Design involves the deployment of many computational tools. Research on challenging real-world design problems is focused on developing improvements for the engineering design process through the integration and application of advanced computational search/optimization and analysis tools. Successful application of these methods generates vast quantities of data on potential optimum designs. To gain maximum value from the optimization process, designers need to visualise and interpret this information leading to better understanding of the complex and multimodal relations between parameters, objectives and decision-making of multiple and strongly conflicting criteria. Initial work by the authors has identified that the Parallel Coordinates interactive visualisation method has considerable potential in this regard. This methodology involves significant levels of user-interaction, making the engineering designer central to the process, rather than the passive recipient of a deluge of pre-formatted information. In the present work we have applied and demonstrated this methodology in two different aerodynamic turbomachinery design cases; a detailed 3D shape design for compressor blades, and a preliminary mean-line design for the whole compressor core. The first case comprises 26 design parameters for the parameterisation of the blade geometry, and we analysed the data produced from a three-objective optimization study, thus describing a design space with 29 dimensions. The latter case comprises 45 design parameters and two objective functions, hence developing a design space with 47 dimensions. In both cases the dimensionality can be managed quite easily in Parallel Coordinates space, and most importantly, we are able to identify interesting and crucial aspects of the relationships between the design parameters and optimum level of the objective functions under consideration. These findings guide the human designer to find answers to questions that could not even be addressed before. In this way, understanding the design leads to more intelligent decision-making and design space exploration.
[1]
Pj Clarkson,et al.
Biobjective Design Optimization for Axial Compressors Using Tabu Search
,
2008
.
[2]
Pj Clarkson,et al.
Insight into High-quality Aerodynamic Design Spaces through Multi-objective Optimization
,
2008
.
[3]
Malcolm I. G. Bloor,et al.
Efficient parametrization of generic aircraft geometry
,
1995
.
[4]
Timoleon Kipouros,et al.
Use of Parallel Coordinates for Post-Analyses of Multi-Objective Aerodynamic Design Optimisation in Turbomachinery
,
2008
.
[5]
Kazuhiro Nakahashi,et al.
Multidisciplinary Design Optimization and Data Mining for Transonic Regional-Jet Wing
,
2007
.
[6]
Shuo-Yan Chou,et al.
Cluster identification with parallel coordinates
,
1999,
Pattern Recognit. Lett..
[7]
Alfred Inselberg,et al.
Multidimensional Lines II: Proximity and Applications
,
1994,
SIAM J. Appl. Math..
[8]
B. Epstein,et al.
Constrained Aerodynamic Optimization of Three-Dimensional Wings Driven by Navier-Stokes Computations
,
2005
.
[9]
Robert M. Edsall.
The parallel coordinate plot in action: design and use for geographic visualization
,
2003,
Comput. Stat. Data Anal..
[10]
Harri Siirtola,et al.
Interacting with parallel coordinates
,
2006,
Interact. Comput..
[11]
Alfred Inselberg,et al.
Multidimensional Lines. I: Representation
,
1994,
SIAM J. Appl. Math..
[12]
Alfred Inselberg,et al.
The plane with parallel coordinates
,
1985,
The Visual Computer.
[13]
Patrick M. Reed,et al.
Many objective visual analytics: rethinking the design of complex engineered systems
,
2013
.
[14]
Doyle Knight,et al.
Multicriteria Design Optimization of a Supersonic Inlet Based upon Global Missile Performance
,
2004
.
[15]
Geoffrey T. Parks,et al.
Multi-objective optimisation of aero-engine compressors
,
2006
.