The syntax of Dutch embedded fragment answers: on the PF-theory of islands and the wh/sluicing correlation

This paper presents new evidence in favour of Merchant’s (2004, 2008) PF-theory of islands, which states that island-sensitivity is due to the presence of PF-uninterpretable traces at PF. This new evidence is provided by two types of Dutch embedded fragment answers: whereas one type is island-sensitive, the other one is not. The former differs from the latter in that it involves an extra movement step, leaving an extra trace. Moreover, this paper argues that the wh/sluicing correlation (van Craenenbroeck and Lipták 2006, 2009) makes the correct predictions regarding the (non-)embeddability of fragment answers in Dutch and English. The wh/sluicing correlation states that there is a correlation between the type of wh-movement a language exhibits and the types of clausal ellipsis attested in that language. I show that it follows straightforwardly that, unlike in Dutch, embedded fragment answers are not attested in English.

[1]  Teruhiko Fukaya,et al.  SLUICING AND STRIPPING IN JAPANESE AND SOME IMPLICATIONS , 2007 .

[2]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Some empirical issues in the theory of transformational grammar , 1970 .

[3]  Johan Rooryck,et al.  State of the article : Evidentiality Part II , 2001 .

[4]  J.-Marc Authier,et al.  Iteratied CPs and embedded topicalization , 1992 .

[5]  Eric Hoekstra,et al.  Licensing conditions on phrase structure , 1991 .

[6]  Peter Svenonius.  The derivation of VO and OV , 2000 .

[7]  S. Barbiers.  The right-periphery in SOV-languages: English and Dutch , 2000 .

[8]  Marcel den Dikken,et al.  On the morphosyntax of wh -movement , 2003 .

[9]  Jason Merchant,et al.  Topics in Ellipsis: Variable island repair under ellipsis , 2008 .

[10]  A. Alexiadou.  Left Dislocation (including CLLD) , 2007 .

[11]  H. Bennis,et al.  On the Interpretation of Functional Categories , 2000 .

[12]  Ellen Barton.  1. Toward a nonsentential analysis in generative grammar , 2006 .

[13]  Michael Hegarty.  Adjunct extraction and chain configurations , 1992 .

[14]  Željko Bošković,et al.  Phases beyond Clauses , 2013 .

[15]  G. Grewendorf.  Multiple Wh-Fronting , 2001, Linguistic Inquiry.

[16]  Chris Collins,et al.  The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory , 2001 .

[17]  Marcel den Dikken,et al.  From Hell to Polarity: Aggressively Non-D-Linked Wh-Phrases as Polarity Items , 2002, Linguistic Inquiry.

[18]  Michael T. Wescoat,et al.  Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics , 1983 .

[19]  Bum-Sik Park.  MaxElide and Parallelism: Don't we need both? , 2010 .

[20]  Jan-Wouter Zwart,et al.  Dutch syntax: A minimalist approach , 1993 .

[21]  J. V. Craenenbroeck,et al.  How do you sluice when there is more than one CP , 2012 .

[22]  L. Rizzi.  The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery , 1997 .

[23]  Hendrikus Johannes Wilhelmus Maria Broekhuis,et al.  Derivations and Evaluations: Object Shift in the Germanic Languages , 2008 .

[24]  Howard Lasnik.  Derivation and Representation in Modern Transformational Syntax , 2008 .

[25]  Hans Broekhuis,et al.  Object shift and subject shift , 2007 .

[26]  M. Meyerhoff,et al.  Working papers in linguistics , 1994 .

[27]  Jeroen Van Craenenbroeck,et al.  The crosslinguistic syntax of sluicing: Evidence from Hungarian relatives , 2006 .

[28]  H. V. Riemsdijk,et al.  Scandinavian object shift and West Germanic scrambling , 2015 .

[29]  L. Haegeman.  Elements of Grammar , 1997 .

[30]  Adriana Belletti,et al.  Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar , 1979 .

[31]  Rolf Noyer,et al.  Movement Operations after Syntax , 2001, Linguistic Inquiry.

[32]  Jorge E. Hankamer,et al.  Constraints on deletion in syntax , 1972 .

[33]  A. Neeleman,et al.  Radical Pro Drop and the Morphology of Pronouns , 2007, Linguistic Inquiry.

[34]  Mats Rooth.  Association with focus , 1985 .

[35]  C. Zwart,et al.  Weer Functionele Projecties , 1997 .

[36]  Lisa Brunetti,et al.  'Information' Focus Movement in Italian and Contextual Constraints on Ellipsis , 2003 .

[37]  Julia Horvath,et al.  FOCUS in the Theory of Grammar and the Syntax of Hungarian , 1986 .

[38]  Noam Chomsky.  Derivation by phase , 1999 .

[39]  Guido Vanden Wyngaerd,et al.  Object shift as an A-movement rule , 1989 .

[40]  A. Lobeck.  Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing, and Identification , 1995 .

[41]  Braj B. Kachru,et al.  ISSUES IN LINGUISTICS , 1973 .

[42]  Fred Weerman,et al.  Arguments and Agreement , 2006 .

[43]  Bum-Sik Park.  Locality and identity in ellipsis , 2005 .

[44]  Samuel David Espstein.  Derivational constraints oh A-chain formation , 1992 .

[45]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  Theory of markedness in generative grammar : proceedings of the 1979 GLOW Conference , 1984 .

[46]  Henk C. van Riemsdijk,et al.  A case study in syntactic markedness: The binding nature of prepositional phrases , 1978 .

[47]  Wendy K. Wilkins,et al.  Phrasal and clausal architecture , 2007 .

[48]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[49]  C. Ebert,et al.  Full Paraphrase Generation for Fragments in Dialogue , 2003 .

[50]  Hans den Besten,et al.  On the Interaction of Root Transformations and Lexical Deletive Rules , 1983 .

[51]  T. Reinhart.  Quantifier Scope: How labor is Divided Between QR and Choice Functions , 1997 .

[52]  J. Craenenbroeck.  Simplex and complex wh-phrases in a split CP , 2007 .

[53]  Jason Merchant,et al.  The syntax of silence : sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis , 2001 .

[54]  Željko Bošković,et al.  On wh -islands and obligatory wh -movement contexts in South Slavic , 2003 .

[55]  Anna Szabolcsi,et al.  Weak islands and an algebraic semantics for scope taking , 1993 .

[56]  K. Kiss.  Configurationality in Hungarian , 1987 .

[57]  J. Rooryck.  Evidentiality, Part II , 2001 .

[58]  Júlia Horváth.  Separating “Focus Movement” from Focus , 2007 .

[59]  Jonathan Ginzburg,et al.  Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning, and Use of English Interrogatives , 2001 .

[60]  Hajime Hoji,et al.  Stripping and Sluicing in Japanese and Some Implications , 1999 .

[61]  Randy J. LaPolla,et al.  Syntax: The goals of linguistic theory , 1997 .

[62]  Jeroen Van Craenenbroeck,et al.  The Syntax of Ellipsis: Evidence from Dutch Dialects , 2010 .

[63]  Howard Lasnik,et al.  Successive-Cyclic Movement and Island Repair: The Difference between Sluicing and VP-Ellipsis , 2003, Linguistic Inquiry.

[64]  Lobke Aelbrecht,et al.  You have the right to remain silent. The syntactic licensing of ellipsis , 2009 .

[65]  S. Barbiers,et al.  Dimensions of Movement: From features to remnants , 2002 .

[66]  Ronnie W. Smith,et al.  Current and New Directions in Discourse and Dialogue , 2004 .

[67]  D. Fox.  Reconstruction, Binding Theory, and the Interpretation of Chains , 1999, Linguistic Inquiry.

[68]  A. Watanabe.  Subjacency and S-structure movement of wh-in-situ , 1992 .

[69]  Jorge Hankamer,et al.  Deletion in coordinate structure , 1979 .

[70]  Lisa deMena Travis,et al.  Parameters and effects of word order variation , 1984 .

[71]  Joachim Sabel,et al.  Partial Wh-Movement and The Typology of Wh-Questions , 2000 .

[72]  Kyle Johnson,et al.  Topics in Ellipsis , 2010 .

[73]  K. Hale,et al.  Ken Hale: A Life in Language , 2001 .

[74]  Jeroen Van Craenenbroeck,et al.  What sluicing can do, what it can't and in which language - On the cross-linguistic syntax of ellipsis , 2013 .

[75]  C. Clifton,et al.  Fragment Answers to Questions: A Case of Inaudible Syntax* , 2013 .

[76]  T. Shopen,et al.  Language typology and syntactic description , 2013 .

[77]  H. V. Riemsdijk,et al.  Materials on Left Dislocation , 1997 .

[78]  Kirsten Gengel,et al.  Focus and Ellipsis : a generative analysis of pseudogapping and other elliptical structures , 2007 .

[79]  M. R. Manzini.  Locality: A Theory and Some of Its Empirical Consequences , 1992 .

[80]  Robert J. Stainton,et al.  Quantifier Phrases, Meaningfulness “in Isolation”, and Ellipsis , 1998 .

[81]  Norvin Richards,et al.  Movement in Language: Interactions and Architectures , 2001 .

[82]  Wolfgang Sternefeld,et al.  Improper movement and unambiguous binding , 1993 .

[83]  Martin Everaert,et al.  The Blackwell Companion to Syntax , 2006 .

[84]  Jan-Wouter Zwart,et al.  Dutch expletives and Small Clause predicate raising , 1992 .

[85]  Jairo Nunes.  Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement , 2004 .

[86]  Catherine R. Fortin,et al.  We Need LF Copying: A Few Good ReasonsWhy , 2011 .

[87]  Jason Merchant,et al.  Fragments and ellipsis , 2005 .

[88]  Željko Bošković,et al.  On the operator freezing effect , 2008 .

[89]  Nigel G. J. Richards,et al.  What Moves Where In Which Language , 1991 .

[90]  André Meinunger,et al.  Pseudoclefts and ellipsis , 2000 .

[91]  Mark Baltin,et al.  The Nonreality of Doubly Filled Comps , 2010, Linguistic Inquiry.

[92]  Thomas E. Payne.  Describing Morphosyntax: A Guide for Field Linguists , 1997 .

[93]  E. Hoekstra,et al.  De structuur van CP : Functionele projecties voor topics en vraagwoorden in het Nederlands , 1994 .

[94]  Ray Cattell,et al.  On the Source of Interrogative Adverbs. , 1978 .

[95]  Hubert Haider,et al.  Verb Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages , 1986 .

[96]  S. Barbiers,et al.  Remnant stranding and the theory of movement , 2002 .

[97]  Robert J. Stainton,et al.  Utterance meaning and syntactic ellipsis , 1997 .

[98]  Arnim von Stechow,et al.  Wh-Scope Marking , 2000 .

[99]  Brian Agbayani,et al.  Wh-Subjects in English and the Vacuous Movement Hypothesis , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.

[100]  Gary Thoms,et al.  ‘Verb floating’ and VP-ellipsis: Towards a movement account of ellipsis licensing , 2011 .