Reproducing 3D Prints on Monitor by Relative-Glossiness Matching Technique

For over 3 decades, computer graphics technology has been developed to simulate physically accurate image of real scene. Meanwhile, useful tone mapping methods have been developed to map luminance range of the simulated image into that of usual monitor without perceptual distortion. However, it is difficult to reproduce accurate glossiness of real objects within the limited monitor luminance range. This also causes inaccurate glossiness sequence among several reproduced images. In this paper, relative-glossiness matching technique is proposed for reliable business to business (B to B) e-commerce system on 3D prints such as beverage cans, PET bottles, snack packages, and so on. The relative-glossiness-matching technique is introduced to preserve perceptual ratio of glossiness of the real 3D print objects in reproduced images. We also propose two operations to control surface-texture gloss and contrast gloss of reproduced images in Hunter’s classification for physical gloss; adding Gaussian noise to surface normal in rendering process and scaling specular reflection in tone mapping. Procedure of subjective evaluation to determine the standard deviation of Gaussian noise and scaling factor for specular reflection is described. An experiment for the relative-glossiness matched images is performed using four types of real papers shaped into 3D cylinders. It was visually confirmed that the reproduced images preserved the glossiness sequence of the real 3D cylinder.

[1]  Jack Tumblin,et al.  Tone Reproduction for Realistic Computer Generated Images , 1991 .

[2]  Robert L. Cook,et al.  A Reflectance Model for Computer Graphics , 1987, TOGS.

[3]  Donald P. Greenberg,et al.  A multiscale model of adaptation and spatial vision for realistic image display , 1998, SIGGRAPH.

[4]  Kenneth Chiu,et al.  Spatially Nonuniform Scaling Functions for High Contrast Images , 1993 .

[5]  Donald P. Greenberg,et al.  Psychophysically based model of surface gloss perception , 2001, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[6]  Shree K. Nayar,et al.  Generalization of the Lambertian model and implications for machine vision , 1995, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[7]  Christine D. Piatko,et al.  A visibility matching tone reproduction operator for high dynamic range scenes , 1997, SIGGRAPH '97.

[8]  Donald P. Greenberg,et al.  Physically-based glare effects for digital images , 1995, SIGGRAPH.

[9]  Christine D. Piatko,et al.  A Visibility Matching Tone Reproduction Operator for High Dynamic Range Scenes , 1997, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[10]  Greg Ward,et al.  A Contrast-Based Scalefactor for Luminance Display , 1994, Graphics Gems.

[11]  Donald P. Greenberg,et al.  Time-dependent visual adaptation for fast realistic image display , 2000, SIGGRAPH.

[12]  Mark D. Fairchild,et al.  Meet iCAM: A Next-Generation Color Appearance Model , 2002, Color Imaging Conference.

[13]  R. S. Hunter,et al.  Methods of determining gloss , 1937 .

[14]  K. Torrance,et al.  Theory for off-specular reflection from roughened surfaces , 1967 .

[15]  Paul E. Debevec,et al.  Real-Time High Dynamic Range Texture Mapping , 2001, Rendering Techniques.

[16]  Yinlong Sun A Physically-Based Reflection Model for Glossy Appearance , 2002, Color Imaging Conference.

[17]  Christophe Schlick,et al.  Quantization Techniques for Visualization of High Dynamic Range Pictures , 1995 .

[18]  Donald P. Greenberg,et al.  A model of visual adaptation for realistic image synthesis , 1996, SIGGRAPH.