Computer aided diagnosis of clustered microcalcifications using artificial neural nets

Objective: Development of a fully automated computer application for detection and classification of clustered microcalcifications using neural nets. Material and Methods: Mammographic films with clustered microcalcifications of known histology were digitized. All clusters were rated by two radiologists on a 3 point scale: benign, indeterminate and malignant. Automated detected clustered microcalcifications were clustered. Features derived from those clusters were used as input to 2 artificial neural nets: one was trained to identify the indeterminate clusters, whereas the second ANN classified the remaining clusters in benign or malignant ones. Performance evaluation followed the patient-based receiver operator characteristic analysis. Results: For identification of patients with indeterminate clusters a an Az-value of 0.8741 could be achieved. For the remaining patients their clusters could be classified as benign or malignant at an Az-value of 0.8749, a sensitivity of 0.977 and specificity of 0.471. Conclusions: A fully automated computer system for detection and classification of clustered microcalcifications was developed. The system is able to identify patients with indeterminate clusters, where additional investigations are recommended, and produces a reliable estimation of the biologic dignity for the remaining ones.

[1]  C E Metz,et al.  Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. , 1989, Investigative radiology.

[2]  G. W. Gross,et al.  Neural networks in radiologic diagnosis. II. Interpretation of neonatal chest radiographs. , 1990, Investigative radiology.

[3]  J. Kelsey,et al.  Epidemiology of breast cancer. , 1990, Epidemiologic reviews.

[4]  E. S. de Paredes,et al.  Mammographic and histologic correlations of microcalcifications. , 1990, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[5]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  A Stochastic Model for Automated Detction of Calculations in Digital Mammograms , 1991, IPMI.

[6]  K Doi,et al.  Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms: applications of artificial neural networks. , 1992, Medical physics.

[7]  L. Tabár,et al.  Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer. , 1992, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[8]  J. Boone Neural networks at the crossroads. , 1993, Radiology.

[9]  Y. Wu,et al.  Artificial neural networks in mammography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer. , 1993, Radiology.

[10]  Nico Karssemeijer ADAPTIVE NOISE EQUALIZATION AND RECOGNITION OF MICROCALCIFICATION CLUSTERS IN MAMMOGRAMS , 1993 .

[11]  C. E. Kahn Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Decision Support Systems Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Decision Support Systems , 1994 .

[12]  W. Kegelmeyer,et al.  Dense feature maps for detection of calcifications , 1994 .

[13]  J. Boone Sidetracked at the crossroads. , 1994, Radiology.

[14]  E. Thurfjell,et al.  Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. , 1994, Radiology.

[15]  J. Hogge,et al.  The mammographic spectrum of fat necrosis of the breast. , 1995, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[16]  C. Floyd,et al.  Breast cancer: prediction with artificial neural network based on BI-RADS standardized lexicon. , 1995, Radiology.

[17]  J. Gurney,et al.  Solitary pulmonary nodules: determining the likelihood of malignancy with neural network analysis. , 1995, Radiology.

[18]  G. W. Gross,et al.  Pediatric skeletal age: determination with neural networks. , 1995, Radiology.

[19]  J. Scott,et al.  Neural networks in ventilation-perfusion imaging. , 1996, Radiology.

[20]  M. Giger,et al.  Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications: automated feature analysis and classification. , 1996, Radiology.

[21]  J. Scott,et al.  Neural networks in ventilation-perfusion imaging. Part II. Effects of interpretive variability. , 1996, Radiology.