The Completeness of Quantum Theory for Predicting Measurement Outcomes

The predictions that quantum theory makes about the outcomes of measurements are generally probabilistic. This has raised the question of whether quantum theory can be considered complete, or whether there could exist alternative theories that provide improved predictions. Here we review recent work that considers arbitrary alternative theories, constrained only by the requirement that they are compatible with a notion of “free choice” defined with respect to a natural causal order. It is shown that quantum theory is “maximally informative”, i.e., there is no other compatible theory that gives improved predictions. Furthermore, any alternative maximally informative theory is necessarily equivalent to quantum theory. This means that the state a system has in such a theory is in one-to-one correspondence with its quantum-mechanical state (the wave function). In this sense, quantum theory is complete.

[1]  Louis de Broglie,et al.  La mécanique ondulatoire et la structure atomique de la matière et du rayonnement , 1927 .

[2]  Renato Renner,et al.  Is a system's wave function in one-to-one correspondence with its elements of reality? , 2011, Physical review letters.

[3]  Roger Colbeck,et al.  No extension of quantum theory can have improved predictive power , 2010, Nature communications.

[4]  P. Hayden,et al.  Universal entanglement transformations without communication , 2003 .

[5]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  An experimental test of non-local realism , 2007, Nature.

[6]  Maximilian Schlosshauer,et al.  On a recent quantum no-go theorem , 2012 .

[7]  A. Shimony,et al.  Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden Variable Theories. , 1969 .

[8]  Michael J. W. Hall,et al.  Generalisations of the recent Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph theorem for statistical models of quantum phenomena , 2011 .

[9]  S. Braunstein,et al.  Wringing out better bell inequalities , 1990 .

[10]  J. Bell.  On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics , 1966 .

[11]  C. Fuchs,et al.  Quantum probabilities as Bayesian probabilities , 2001, quant-ph/0106133.

[12]  Lucien Hardy,et al.  Quantum ontological excess baggage , 2004 .

[13]  Matthew F Pusey,et al.  On the reality of the quantum state , 2011, Nature Physics.

[14]  Ekert,et al.  Quantum cryptography based on Bell's theorem. , 1991, Physical review letters.

[15]  Robert W. Spekkens,et al.  Einstein, Incompleteness, and the Epistemic View of Quantum States , 2007, 0706.2661.

[16]  Roger Colbeck,et al.  Free randomness can be amplified , 2011, Nature Physics.

[17]  Anthony J Leggett,et al.  Nonlocal Hidden-Variable Theories and Quantum Mechanics: An Incompatibility Theorem , 2006 .

[18]  Alberto Montina,et al.  Measurement contextuality is implied by macroscopic realism , 2010, 1012.2122.

[19]  Lucien Hardy,et al.  ARE QUANTUM STATES REAL , 2012, 1205.1439.

[20]  R. Spekkens.  Contextuality for preparations, transformations, and unsharp measurements , 2004, quant-ph/0406166.

[21]  Alberto Montina,et al.  Exponential complexity and ontological theories of quantum mechanics , 2007, 0711.4770.

[22]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics , 1989 .

[23]  J. Bell,et al.  Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Preface to the first edition , 2004 .

[24]  Christian Kurtsiefer,et al.  Testing quantum correlations versus single-particle properties within Leggett’s model and beyond , 2008, 0801.2241.

[25]  Gilles Brassard,et al.  Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing , 2014, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[26]  P. Pearle.  Hidden-Variable Example Based upon Data Rejection , 1970 .

[27]  Alain Aspect,et al.  Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: On the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox , 2004 .

[28]  Robert W. Spekkens,et al.  Formulating Quantum Theory as a Causally Neutral Theory of Bayesian Inference , 2011 .

[29]  D. Bohm.  A SUGGESTED INTERPRETATION OF THE QUANTUM THEORY IN TERMS OF "HIDDEN" VARIABLES. II , 1952 .

[30]  David Jennings,et al.  Distinct quantum states can be compatible with a single state of reality. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[31]  Roger Colbeck,et al.  A short note on the concept of free choice , 2013, 1302.4446.

[32]  R. Spekkens.  Evidence for the epistemic view of quantum states: A toy theory , 2004, quant-ph/0401052.

[33]  Adrian Kent,et al.  No signaling and quantum key distribution. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[34]  Albert Einstein,et al.  Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[35]  J. Bell.  La nouvelle cuisine , 1990 .

[36]  J. S. BELLt.  Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox , 2018 .

[37]  Alberto Montina,et al.  State-space dimensionality in short-memory hidden-variable theories , 2010, 1008.4415.

[38]  Stefano Pironio,et al.  Maximally Non-Local and Monogamous Quantum Correlations , 2006, Physical review letters.

[39]  Roger Colbeck,et al.  Hidden variable models for quantum theory cannot have any local part. , 2008, Physical review letters.