Why Does the Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Enhance Firm Value? The Case of Japanese Manufacturing Firms

This paper examines the influence of firms’ reductions of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions on firm value, measured by Tobin's q. If the stockholders/investors regard the reduction of GHG emissions as a form of intangible value, the reduction of GHG emissions will enhance firm value. To prove this relation more precisely, this paper analyzes not only the effect of the reduction of GHG emissions on firm value but also that of the market discipline imposed by the stockholders/investors in terms of the reduction of GHG emissions. Using data on 641 Japanese manufacturing firms in the period 2006–2008, the random effect instrumental variable estimate supports the view that firms with strong market discipline imposed by stockholders/investors are more likely to reduce GHG emissions and, consequently, firms that reduce more GHG emissions are more likely to enhance firm value. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

[1]  A. Prakash,et al.  Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities' environmental performance , 2005 .

[2]  Stuart L. Hart,et al.  Do Corporate Global Environmental Standards Create or Destroy Market Value , 2000 .

[3]  F. Takeda,et al.  An Empirical Study on Stock Price Responses to the Release of the Environmental Management Ranking in Japan , 2006 .

[4]  Keiko Yamaguchi,et al.  Reexamination of stock price reaction to environmental performance: A GARCH application , 2008 .

[5]  Ans Kolk,et al.  Challenges and trade-offs in corporate innovation for climate change , 2010 .

[6]  John Elkington,et al.  The end of the corporate environmental report? Or the advent of cybernetic sustainability reporting and communication , 2001 .

[7]  Ravi Subramanian,et al.  An empirical investigation of environmental performance and the market value of the firm , 2010 .

[8]  Governance Structures and Management Efficiency in Japanese Companies , 2010 .

[9]  Toshi H. Arimura,et al.  Is a voluntary approach an effective environmental policy instrument , 2008 .

[10]  A. Campbell,et al.  Corporate strategy: The quest for parenting advantage , 1995 .

[11]  Madhu Khanna,et al.  Incentives for Environmental Self-Regulation and Implications for Environmental Performance , 2004 .

[12]  Pratima Bansal,et al.  Strategic Explanations for the Early Adoption of ISO 14001 , 2003 .

[13]  Eric W. Welch,et al.  Voluntary behavior by electric utilities: Levels of adoption and contribution of the climate challenge program to the reduction of carbon dioxide , 2000 .

[14]  Colin Mayer,et al.  THE ASSESSMENT:CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND CORPORATE CONTROL , 1992 .

[15]  C. Ahmadjian.  Foreign Investors and Corporate Governance in Japan 1 , 2007 .

[16]  L. Starks,et al.  EFA Keynote Speech: 'Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility: What Do Investors Care About? What Should Investors Care About?' , 2009 .

[17]  M. Russo,et al.  Organizational Design and Environmental Performance: Clues From the Electronics Industry , 2005 .

[18]  Philippe Barla,et al.  ISO 14001 Certification and Environmental Performance in Quebec's Pulp and Paper Industry , 2007 .

[19]  M. Nakano,et al.  Relationship between environmental performance and financial performance: an empirical analysis of japanese corporations , 2007 .

[20]  Kathleen Segerson,et al.  Voluntary Environmental Agreements: Good or Bad News for Environmental Protection? , 1998 .

[21]  R. Newell.  The role of markets and policies in delivering innovation for climate change mitigation , 2010 .

[22]  James J. Cordeiro,et al.  Environmental proactivism and firm performance: evidence from security analyst earnings forecasts , 1997 .

[23]  Alison Thomas.  Corporate environmental policy and abnormal stock price returns: An empirical investigation , 2001 .

[24]  J. Hamilton.  Pollution as News: Media and Stock Market Reactions to the Toxics Release Inventory Data , 1995 .

[25]  Toshi H. Arimura,et al.  Is a Voluntary Approach an Effective Environmental Policy Instrument? A Case for Environmental Management Systems , 2007 .

[26]  Perry Sadorsky,et al.  The Determinants of an Environmentally Responsive Firm: An Empirical Approach , 1996 .

[27]  A. Shleifer,et al.  Large Shareholders and Corporate Control , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[28]  Evan D.G. Fraser,et al.  Local authorities, climate change and small and medium enterprises: identifying effective policy instruments to reduce energy use and carbon emissions , 2008 .

[29]  Henri Servaes,et al.  Equity ownership and the two faces of debt , 1995 .

[30]  E. Welch,et al.  VOLUNTARY ADOPTION OF ISO 14001 IN JAPAN: MECHANISMS, STAGES AND EFFECTS , 2002 .

[31]  Minna Halme,et al.  The influence of corporate governance, industry and country factors on environmental reporting , 1997 .

[32]  Jun-Koo Kang,et al.  Firm performance, corporate governance, and top executive turnover in Japan , 1995 .

[33]  W. Bogner,et al.  Deciding on ISO 14001: Economics, Institutions, and Context , 2002 .

[34]  Madhu Khanna,et al.  Toxics Release Information: A Policy Tool for Environmental Protection , 1998 .

[35]  Shameek Konar,et al.  Does the Market Value Environmental Performance? , 2001, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[36]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[37]  Di Jin,et al.  Environmental Regulations and Technological Change in the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry: Rethinking the Porter Hypothesis , 2002 .

[38]  Andrew King,et al.  Exploring the Locus of Profitable Pollution Reduction , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[39]  Andreas R. Ziegler,et al.  The Effect of Environmental and Social Performance on the Stock Performance of European Corporations , 2007 .

[40]  Shreekant Gupta,et al.  Do Stock Markets Penalise Environment-Unfriendly Behaviour? Evidence from India , 2003 .

[41]  A. Hibiki,et al.  Environmental Information Provision, Market Valuation, and Firm Incentives: An Empirical Study of the Japanese PRTR System , 2010, Land Economics.

[42]  David L. Levy,et al.  Corporate Responses in an Emerging Climate Regime: The Institutionalization and Commensuration of Carbon Disclosure , 2008 .

[43]  Madhu Khanna,et al.  Non-mandatory Approaches to Environmental Protection , 2002 .

[44]  R. Klassen,et al.  The impact of environmental management on firm performance , 1996 .

[45]  Stuart L. Hart,et al.  DOES IT PAY TO BE GREEN? AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EMISSION REDUCTION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE , 1996 .

[46]  K. Segerson,et al.  Voluntary Agreements with Industries: Participation Incentives with Industry-Wide Targets , 2008, Land Economics.

[47]  K. Sasaki,et al.  Motivation of Japanese companies to take environmental action to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions: an econometric analysis , 2008 .