The Interplay of Bottom-Up and Top-Down Mechanisms in Visual Guidance during Object Naming
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] G. Zelinsky,et al. An effect of referential scene constraint on search implies scene segmentation , 2009 .
[2] Geoffrey M. Underwood,et al. Cognitive Processes in Eye Guidance: Algorithms for Attention in Image Processing , 2009, Cognitive Computation.
[3] C. Koch,et al. Task-demands can immediately reverse the effects of sensory-driven saliency in complex visual stimuli. , 2008, Journal of vision.
[4] Michael L. Mack,et al. VISUAL SALIENCY DOES NOT ACCOUNT FOR EYE MOVEMENTS DURING VISUAL SEARCH IN REAL-WORLD SCENES , 2007 .
[5] Geoffrey M. Underwood,et al. If Visual Saliency Predicts Search, Then Why? Evidence from Normal and Gaze-Contingent Search Tasks in Natural Scenes , 2011, Cognitive Computation.
[6] L. Itti,et al. Mechanisms of top-down attention , 2011, Trends in Neurosciences.
[7] L. Gleitman,et al. On the give and take between event apprehension and utterance formulation. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.
[8] J. Henderson,et al. Object-based attentional selection in scene viewing. , 2010, Journal of vision.
[9] C. Koch,et al. A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention , 2000, Vision Research.
[10] R. D. Gordon,et al. Attention to smoking-related and incongruous objects during scene viewing. , 2008, Acta psychologica.
[11] Krista A. Ehinger,et al. Modelling search for people in 900 scenes: A combined source model of eye guidance , 2009 .
[12] P. de Graef,et al. Perceptual effects of scene context on object identification , 1990, Psychological research.
[13] Laurent Itti,et al. Interesting objects are visually salient. , 2008, Journal of vision.
[14] Christof Koch,et al. Modeling attention to salient proto-objects , 2006, Neural Networks.
[15] M. Castelhano,et al. The relative contribution of scene context and target features to visual search in scenes , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[16] Karl J. Friston. The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[17] Antje S. Meyer,et al. The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming , 1991 .
[18] Vision Research , 1961, Nature.
[19] W. Levelt,et al. Effects of semantic context in the naming of pictures and words , 2001, Cognition.
[20] G. Underwood,et al. Congruency, saliency and gist in the inspection of objects in natural scenes , 2007 .
[21] Gregory J. Zelinsky,et al. Visual search is guided to categorically-defined targets , 2009, Vision Research.
[22] J. G. Snodgrass,et al. A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.
[23] Dave Bartram,et al. The role of visual and semantic codes in object naming , 1974 .
[24] W. Levelt,et al. Viewing and naming objects: eye movements during noun phrase production , 1998, Cognition.
[25] Andrew Hollingworth,et al. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance The Nesting of Search Contexts Within Natural Scenes : Evidence From Contextual Cuing , 2010 .
[26] George L. Malcolm,et al. Combining top-down processes to guide eye movements during real-world scene search. , 2010, Journal of vision.
[27] Gregory J. Zelinsky,et al. Synchronizing Visual and Language Processing: An Effect of Object Name Length on Eye Movements , 2000, Psychological science.
[28] T. Foulsham,et al. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: in press Visual saliency and semantic incongruency influence eye movements when , 2022 .
[29] D. Ballard,et al. Eye movements in natural behavior , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[30] D. Mirman,et al. Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.
[31] M. Potter,et al. Pictures in sentences: understanding without words. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[32] T. Foulsham,et al. Is attention necessary for object identification? Evidence from eye movements during the inspection of real-world scenes , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.
[33] G. V. Simpson,et al. Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.
[34] Benjamin W. Tatler,et al. Systematic tendencies in scene viewing , 2008 .
[35] P. Perona,et al. Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[36] S. Metlapally,et al. The effect of positive lens defocus on ocular growth and emmetropization in the tree shrew. , 2008, Journal of vision.
[37] Geoffrey E. Hinton. Learning multiple layers of representation , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[38] Katie L. McMahon,et al. Semantic Context and Visual Feature Effects in Object Naming: An fMRI Study using Arterial Spin Labeling , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[39] Moreno I. Coco,et al. The Impact of Visual Information on Reference Assignment in Sentence Production , 2009 .
[40] Linda Lundström,et al. The pupils and optical systems of gecko eyes. , 2009, Journal of vision.
[41] J. Enns,et al. What's next? New evidence for prediction in human vision , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[42] Zenzi M. Griffin,et al. Constraint, Word Frequency, and the Relationship between Lexical Processing Levels in Spoken Word Production , 1998 .
[43] J. Henderson,et al. Object–scene inconsistencies do not capture gaze: evidence from the flash-preview moving-window paradigm , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[44] Miguel P Eckstein,et al. Object co-occurrence serves as a contextual cue to guide and facilitate visual search in a natural viewing environment. , 2011, Journal of vision.
[45] Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al. Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. , 1999 .
[46] M. Potter. Meaning in visual search. , 1975, Science.
[47] Miguel P Eckstein,et al. Attentional Cues in Real Scenes, Saccadic Targeting, and Bayesian Priors , 2005, Psychological science.
[48] R. Baayen,et al. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .
[49] Jodi L. Davenport,et al. Scene Consistency in Object and Background Perception , 2004, Psychological science.
[50] Benjamin W Tatler,et al. The central fixation bias in scene viewing: selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions. , 2007, Journal of vision.
[51] N. Mackworth,et al. The gaze selects informative details within pictures , 1967 .
[52] J. Henderson,et al. The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing , 1999 .
[53] George L. Malcolm,et al. Searching in the dark: Cognitive relevance drives attention in real-world scenes , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[54] Alex D. Hwang,et al. Semantic guidance of eye movements in real-world scenes , 2011, Vision Research.
[55] G. Altmann,et al. Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm , 2005, Cognition.
[56] N. Mackworth,et al. Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[57] A. Clark. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.
[58] A. Treisman,et al. Perception of objects in natural scenes: is it really attention free? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[59] Antonio Torralba,et al. Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. , 2006, Psychological review.
[60] A. Caramazza,et al. The locus of the frequency effect in picture naming: When recognizing is not enough , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[61] Derrick J. Parkhurst,et al. Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention , 2002, Vision Research.
[62] V Di Lollo,et al. The preattentive emperor has no clothes: a dynamic redressing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[63] J. Henderson,et al. Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.
[64] Moreno I. Coco,et al. A Bayesian Model of the Effect of Object Context on Visual Attention , 2012, CogSci.
[65] Ali Borji,et al. Quantitative Analysis of Human-Model Agreement in Visual Saliency Modeling: A Comparative Study , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.
[66] Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al. Speakers gaze at objects while preparing intentionally inaccurate labels for them. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[67] Antonio Torralba,et al. LabelMe: A Database and Web-Based Tool for Image Annotation , 2008, International Journal of Computer Vision.
[68] D. Ballard,et al. Eye guidance in natural vision: reinterpreting salience. , 2011, Journal of vision.
[69] George L. Malcolm,et al. The effects of target template specificity on visual search in real-world scenes: evidence from eye movements. , 2009, Journal of vision.
[70] F. Hamker,et al. About the influence of post-saccadic mechanisms for visual stability on peri-saccadic compression of object location. , 2008, Journal of vision.
[71] D. Barr. Analyzing ‘visual world’ eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression , 2008 .
[72] Daniel A. Gajewski,et al. Minimal use of working memory in a scene comparison task , 2005 .