Assessing the influence of row spacing on soybean yield using experimental and producer survey data

Abstract Narrowing row width in soybean fields leads to earlier canopy closure, which may increase capture of incoming solar radiation during critical crop stages for yield determination. Theoretically, this should enhance seed yield. However, in prior studies, the impact of narrowing row spacing on soybean yield has been inconsistent. To explore on a broader scale the potential factors underlying this inconsistency, we evaluated the yield difference between narrow (NR; ≈38 cm) and wide (WR; ≈76 cm) row spacing using two sources of yield and management information: (i) data collected from 4879 soybean production fields via a multi-year, multi-state survey of soybean producers in the North Central US region; and (ii) data extracted from 129 site-year experiments that quantified NR-WR yield difference. The producer fields were allocated to their respective climate-soil domains to enable analysis of the NR-WR yield difference within each domain. The experimental trial data originated from three US geographic regions: south, central, and north. Key crop developmental stages in each trial were estimated using a soybean crop simulation model to discern if changes in crop phenology or any weather variable occurring before versus after a specific crop stage modulated the magnitude of the NR-WR yield difference. Analysis of experimental trial data indicated that, while NR yields were overall higher than WR yields, the NR-WR yield difference varied by region: 540 (south), 104 (central), and 240 kg ha−1 (north); the respective NR yields were greater than WR yields in 92%, 68%, and 84% of the cases. In the north and south regions, the NR-WR yield difference increased when the crop cycle length decreased as a consequence of later sowing date, earlier cultivar maturity group, and/or higher temperature. The relatively smaller (and occasionally negative) NR-WR yield difference detected in the central region was likely the result of environmental conditions that favored canopy closure irrespective of row spacing. In contrast to the analysis of the experimental database, no consistent NR-WR yield differences were detected in the producer field database. We hypothesize that the apparent absence of a significant NR-WR effect in the producer dataset is likely associated with the background management used with narrow spacing, together with yield losses due to wheel damage and greater disease pressure. This complementary approach using both producer and experimental data can help evaluate if practices documented in experimental trials to enhance yield realize equivalent yield increases in producer fields and, if not, explore underlying causes for the discrepancy.

[1]  Zvi Hochman,et al.  Beyond the plot: technology extrapolation domains for scaling out agronomic science , 2018, Environmental research letters : ERL [Web site].

[2]  Daren S. Mueller,et al.  Assessing causes of yield gaps in agricultural areas with diversity in climate and soils , 2017 .

[3]  P. Pedersen,et al.  Adjusting management practices using glyphosate-resistant soybean cultivars , 2004 .

[4]  Kenneth G. Cassman,et al.  Limits to maize productivity in Western Corn-Belt: A simulation analysis for fully irrigated and rainfed conditions , 2009 .

[5]  J. Board,et al.  Growth Dynamics during the Vegetative Period Affects Yield of Narrow-Row, Late-Planted Soybean , 1996 .

[6]  C. H. Koger,et al.  Plant Population and Row‐Spacing Effects on Maturity Group III Soybean , 2010 .

[7]  Yaxing Wei,et al.  Daymet: Daily Surface Weather Data on a 1-km Grid for North America, Version 2 , 2014 .

[8]  J. Santini,et al.  Fungicide Application Timing and Row Spacing Effect on Soybean Canopy Penetration and Grain Yield , 2008 .

[9]  A. Tatem,et al.  Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations , 2009 .

[10]  Jean-Michel Ané,et al.  Soybean Cyst Nematode Control with Pasteuria nishizawae Under Different Management Practices , 2018, Agronomy Journal.

[11]  Jerome H. Cherney,et al.  Growth and Yield Responses of Soybean to Row Spacing and Seeding Rate , 2011 .

[12]  P. Pedersen,et al.  EFFECT OF ROW SPACING AND SEEDING RATE ON SOYBEAN YIELD , 2008 .

[13]  Damon L. Smith,et al.  An overview of the Sclerotinia sclerotiorum pathosystem in soybean: impact, fungal biology, and current management strategies , 2018, Tropical Plant Pathology.

[14]  Albert Weiss,et al.  Understanding and modeling the effect of temperature and daylength on soybean phenology under high-yield conditions , 2007 .

[15]  Simon E. Cook,et al.  On-farm experimentation. , 2013 .

[16]  J. Board,et al.  A criterion for acceptance of narrow-row culture in soybean , 1994 .

[17]  J. Specht,et al.  Soybean Phenology Simulation in the North‐Central United States , 2011 .

[18]  Richard D. Taylor,et al.  Wheel Traffic to Narrow-Row Reproductive-Stage Soybean Lowers Yield , 2008 .

[19]  A. G. Cirilo,et al.  Yield Responses to Narrow Rows Depend on Increased Radiation Interception , 2002 .

[20]  D. Mueller,et al.  Sifting and winnowing: Analysis of farmer field data for soybean in the US North-Central region , 2018 .

[21]  G Philip Robertson,et al.  Field-scale experiments reveal persistent yield gaps in low-input and organic cropping systems , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  A. P. Robinson,et al.  Simulation of soybean growth and yield in near-optimal growth conditions , 2010 .

[23]  D. Bullock,et al.  Soybean yield response to narrow rows is largely due to enhanced early growth , 1998 .

[24]  R. Roberts,et al.  Mid-South Soybean Yield and Net Return as Affected by Plant Population and Row Spacing , 2015 .

[25]  E. Gbur,et al.  Soybean Maturity Group Choices for Maximizing Radiation Interception across Planting Dates in the Midsouth United States , 2015 .