An optomotor control system with automatic compensation for contrast and texture

When an animal’s surroundings move, the animal normally follows that movement by turning its eyes (that is, by an optomotor reaction). As a result, the retinal image is partly stabilized. The efficacy of this stabilization necessarily depends on the gain of the optomotor control circuit. So far no biological detectors of retinal image movements have been discovered in either vertebrates or invertebrates that is, elements capable of generating a signal proportional to the movement velocity, which could serve as sensors in this control system (Borst & Egelhaaf 1989). The reason is that m any other parameters, such as the light intensity and the ‘texture’ of the pattern, also affect the neuronal output. If movement detection is texture dependent, for instance, the gain and hence the quality of stabilization must also be texture dependent. But in humans, at least, with large-field stimulation the quality of retinal image stabilization has been found to be largely independent of texture (de Graaf et al. 1990). Here I describe a control system with gain control that permits automatic compensation, under closed-loop conditions, of the dependence of movement detection on parameters such as texture, brightness and so on. Comparison with data from experiments on arthropods shows that, in these animals at least, a control circuit with nonlinear properties like those suggested here has in fact been realized.

[1]  D Marr,et al.  Directional selectivity and its use in early visual processing , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[2]  Alexander Borst,et al.  Principles of visual motion detection , 1989, Trends in Neurosciences.

[3]  G A Horridge,et al.  Optokinetic memory in the crab, Carcinus. , 1966, The Journal of experimental biology.

[4]  J. Thorson Dynamics of Motion Perception in the Desert Locust , 1964, Science.

[5]  A. Borst,et al.  Transient and steady-state response properties of movement detectors. , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[6]  B. Hassenstein,et al.  Systemtheoretische Analyse der Zeit-, Reihenfolgen- und Vorzeichenauswertung bei der Bewegungsperzeption des Rüsselkäfers Chlorophanus , 1956 .

[7]  Erich Buchner,et al.  Behavioural Analysis of Spatial Vision in Insects , 1984 .

[8]  Willem Bles,et al.  Angular velocity, not temporal frequency determines circular vection , 1990, Vision Research.

[9]  D. H. Kelly Motion and vision. II. Stabilized spatio-temporal threshold surface. , 1979, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[10]  W. Reichardt Autokorrelations-Auswertung als Funktionsprinzip des Zentralnervensystems , 1957 .

[11]  D. Varjú Optomotorische Reaktionen auf die Bewegung periodischer Helligkeitsmuster , 1959 .

[12]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Übertragungseigenschaften im Auswertesystem für das Bewegungssehen , 1959 .

[13]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system , 1961 .

[14]  H. Wagner Flight Performance and Visual Control of Flight of the Free-Flying Housefly (Musca Domestica L.) III. Interactions Between Angular Movement Induced by Wide- and Smallfield Stimuli , 1986 .