International monitoring system correlation detection at the North Korean nuclear test site at Punggye-ri with insights from the source physics experiment

Online Material: Figures of array correlation detection with an alternative embedded event, correlation score as a function of time‐bandwidth product, and correlation score using alternative time periods. Seismic waveform correlation offers the prospect of greatly reducing event detection thresholds when compared with more conventional processing methods. Correlation is applicable for seismic events that in some sense repeat, that is they have very similar waveforms (e.g., Gibbons and Ringdal, 2006). A number of recent studies have shown that correlated seismic signals may form a significant fraction of seismicity at regional distances (e.g., Schaff and Richards, 2011; Dodge and Walter, 2015; Slinkard et al. , 2015). For the particular case of multiple nuclear explosions at the same test site, regional distance correlation also allows very precise relative location measurements (e.g., Waldhauser et al. , 2004; Wen and Long, 2010) and could offer the potential to lower thresholds when multiple events exist (e.g., National Research Council, 2012). Using the Comprehensive Nuclear‐Test‐Ban Treaty (CTBT) International Monitoring System (IMS) seismic array at Matsushiro, Japan (MJAR), Gibbons and Ringdal (2012) were able to create a multichannel correlation detector with a very low false alarm rate and a threshold below magnitude 3.0. They did this using the 2006 or 2009 Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) nuclear explosion as a template to search through a data stream from the same station to find a match via waveform correlation. In this article, we extend the work of Gibbons and Ringdal (2012) and measure the correlation detection threshold at several other IMS arrays. We use this to address three main points. First, we show the IMS array station at Mina, Nevada (NVAR), which is closest to the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS), is able to detect a chemical explosion that is well under 1 ton with the right template. …

[1]  Christopher M. Wright,et al.  Low-Yield Nuclear Testing by North Korea in May 2010: Assessing the Evidence with Atmospheric Transport Models and Xenon Activity Calculations , 2013 .

[2]  William R. Walter,et al.  Initial Global Seismic Cross-Correlation Results: Implications for Empirical Signal Detectors , 2014 .

[3]  John R. Murphy,et al.  Seismic characteristics of underground nuclear detonations Part I. Seismic spectrum scaling , 1971 .

[4]  Paul G. Richards,et al.  On finding and using repeating seismic events in and near China , 2011 .

[5]  Masayuki Obayashi,et al.  Crustal structure beneath NE China imaged by NECESSArray receiver function data , 2014 .

[6]  Miao Zhang,et al.  Seismological Evidence for a Low‐Yield Nuclear Test on 12 May 2010 in North Korea , 2015 .

[7]  L. Wen,et al.  High‐precision location and yield of North Korea's 2013 nuclear test , 2013 .

[8]  F. Ringdal,et al.  The detection of low magnitude seismic events using array-based waveform correlation , 2006 .

[9]  Gerhard Wotawa,et al.  Meteorological analysis of the detection of xenon and barium/lanthanum isotopes in May 2010 in Eastern Asia , 2013, Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry.

[10]  P. Richards,et al.  Seismological Constraints on Proposed Low-Yield Nuclear Testing in Particular Regions and Time Periods in the Past, with Comments on “Radionuclide Evidence for Low-Yield Nuclear Testing in North Korea in April/May 2010” by Lars-Erik De Geer , 2012 .

[11]  Christopher John Young,et al.  Multistation Validation of Waveform Correlation Techniques as Applied to Broad Regional Monitoring , 2014 .

[12]  J. L. Stevens,et al.  The physical basis of mb:Ms and variable frequency magnitude methods for earthquake/explosion discrimination. Topical report , 1982 .

[13]  Steven J. Gibbons,et al.  Seismic Monitoring of the North Korea Nuclear Test Site Using a Multichannel Correlation Detector , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  A. Rodgers,et al.  Seismic Source Characteristics of Nuclear and Chemical Explosions in Granite from Hydrodynamic Simulations , 2014, Pure and Applied Geophysics.

[15]  Catherine Mary Snelson,et al.  Chemical Explosion Experiments to Improve Nuclear Test Monitoring , 2013 .

[16]  Won-Young Kim,et al.  Lop Nor Revisited: Underground Nuclear Explosion Locations, 1976-1996, from Double-Difference Analysis of Regional and Teleseismic Data , 2004 .

[17]  L. Wen,et al.  High-precision Location of North Korea's 2009 Nuclear Test , 2010 .

[18]  Harri Toivonen,et al.  140La/140Ba ratio dating of a nuclear release , 2013, Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry.

[19]  Lars-Erik De Geer,et al.  Reinforced evidence of a low-yield nuclear test in North Korea on 11 May 2010 , 2013 .

[20]  Lars-Erik De Geer,et al.  Radionuclide Evidence for Low-Yield Nuclear Testing in North Korea in April/May 2010 , 2012 .

[21]  W. Walter,et al.  An Explosion Model Comparison with Insights from the Source Physics Experiments , 2013 .