Analysis of electromagnetic scattering from a cavity with a complex termination by means of a hybrid ray-FDTD method

The electromagnetic modeling of engine cavities is a very difficult task because the electrical size of the cavity is very large, while the engine termination is geometrically complex. High-frequency techniques can adequately model the cavity, but perform poorly when applied to the termination. Low-frequency techniques are currently infeasible for such large geometries because of the large memory and computation time requirements. The authors present a hybrid method which combines the most attractive features of the lowand high-frequency techniques. The finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method is applied to the small region surrounding the termination. The remainder of the cavity is modeled with ray methods. To validate this method, they consider two-dimensional cavities with complex terminations. Their results are compared against those found from a hybrid combination of the modal method and the method of moments. >

[1]  Hao Ling,et al.  Ray‐tube integration in shooting and bouncing ray method , 1988 .

[2]  K. Yee Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving maxwell's equations in isotropic media , 1966 .

[3]  Robert L. Higdon,et al.  Numerical absorbing boundary conditions for the wave equation , 1987 .

[4]  K. S. Yee,et al.  Conformal finite difference time domain (FDTD) with overlapping grids , 1992, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium 1992 Digest.

[5]  Hao Ling,et al.  High-frequency RCS of open cavities with rectangular and circular cross sections , 1989 .

[6]  A. Cangellaris,et al.  Analysis of the numerical error caused by the stair-stepped approximation of a conducting boundary in FDTD simulations of electromagnetic phenomena , 1991 .

[7]  Prabhakar H. Pathak,et al.  A reciprocity formulation for the EM scattering by an obstacle within a large open cavity , 1993 .

[8]  R. Chou,et al.  A versatile reflector antenna pattern computation method: shooting and bouncing rays , 1988, 1988 IEEE AP-S. International Symposium, Antennas and Propagation.

[9]  Shyh-Kang Jeng,et al.  High frequency scattering from trihedral corner reflectors and other benchmark targets: SBR versus experiment , 1991 .

[10]  Allen Taflove,et al.  Application of the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method to Sinusoidal Steady-State Electromagnetic-Penetration Problems , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[11]  Prabhakar H. Pathak,et al.  Two ray shooting methods for computing the EM scattering by large open-ended cavities , 1991 .

[12]  S. W. Lee,et al.  Reduction of the radar cross section of arbitrarily shaped cavity structures , 1987 .

[13]  R. Holland Finite-Difference Solution of Maxwell's Equations in Generalized Nonorthogonal Coordinates , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[14]  A. Taflove,et al.  Numerical Solution of Steady-State Electromagnetic Scattering Problems Using the Time-Dependent Maxwell's Equations , 1975 .

[15]  G. Deschamps,et al.  Ray techniques in electromagnetics , 1972 .

[16]  R. Burkholder,et al.  High-frequency asymptotic methods for analyzing the EM scattering by open-ended waveguide cavities , 1989 .

[17]  G. Mur Absorbing Boundary Conditions for the Finite-Difference Approximation of the Time-Domain Electromagnetic-Field Equations , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[18]  S. Lee,et al.  Shooting and bouncing rays: calculating the RCS of an arbitrarily shaped cavity , 1989 .

[19]  Roger F. Harrington,et al.  Field computation by moment methods , 1968 .

[20]  R. Higdon Absorbing boundary conditions for difference approximations to the multi-dimensional wave equation , 1986 .

[21]  K. S. Yee,et al.  Conformal finite-different time-domain (FDTD) with overlapping grids , 1992 .