A systems-based approach for integrated design of materials, products and design process chains

The concurrent design of materials and products provides designers with flexibility to achieve design objectives that were not previously accessible. However, the improved flexibility comes at a cost of increased complexity of the design process chains and the materials simulation models used for executing the design chains. Efforts to reduce the complexity generally result in increased uncertainty. We contend that a systems based approach is essential for managing both the complexity and the uncertainty in design process chains and simulation models in concurrent material and product design. Our approach is based on simplifying the design process chains systematically such that the resulting uncertainty does not significantly affect the overall system performance. Similarly, instead of striving for accurate models for multiscale systems (that are inherently complex), we rely on making design decisions that are robust to uncertainties in the models. Accordingly, we pursue hierarchical modeling in the context of design of multiscale systems. In this paper our focus is on design process chains. We present a systems based approach, premised on the assumption that complex systems can be designed efficiently by managing the complexity of design process chains. The approach relies on (a) the use of reusable interaction patterns to model design process chains, and (b) consideration of design process decisions using value-of-information based metrics. The approach is illustrated using a Multifunctional Energetic Structural Material (MESM) design example. Energetic materials store considerable energy which can be released through shock-induced detonation; conventionally, they are not engineered for strength properties. The design objectives for the MESM in this paper include both sufficient strength and energy release characteristics. The design is carried out by using models at different length and time scales that simulate different aspects of the system. Finally, by applying the method to the MESM design problem, we show that the integrated design of materials and products can be carried out more efficiently by explicitly accounting for design process decisions with the hierarchy of models.

[1]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  An Inductive Design Exploration Method for the Integrated Design of Multi-scale Materials and Products , 2005, DAC 2005.

[2]  Jitesh H. Panchal,et al.  A framework for simulation-based integrated design of multiscale products and design processes , 2005 .

[3]  Kenneth J. Arrow,et al.  Studies in Resource Allocation Processes: Appendix: An optimality criterion for decision-making under ignorance , 1977 .

[4]  Wei Chen,et al.  A robust concept exploration method for configuring complex systems , 1995 .

[5]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  The Use of Imprecise Probabilities to Estimate the Value of Information in Design , 2005 .

[6]  G. Shackle,et al.  Uncertainty and expectations in economics : essays in honour of G.L.S. Shackle , 1972 .

[7]  G. B. Olson,et al.  Computational Design of Hierarchically Structured Materials , 1997 .

[8]  David L. McDowell,et al.  Numerical simulation of shock wave propagation in spatially-resolved particle systems , 2006 .

[9]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  A Strategy for Simulation-Based Multiscale, Multi-Functional Products and Associated Design Processes , 2005, DAC 2005.

[10]  D. Benson A multi-material Eulerian formulation for the efficient solution of impact and penetration problems , 1995 .

[11]  Manohar P. Kamat Structural optimization : status and promise , 1993 .

[12]  Ryan A. Austin Numerical Simulation of the Shock Compression of Microscale Reactive Particle Systems , 2005 .

[13]  G I Taylor,et al.  JAMES FORREST LECTURE 1946. THE TESTING OF MATERIALS AT HIGH RATES OF LOADING. , 1946 .

[14]  Hae-Jin Choi,et al.  A Robust Design Method for Model and Propagated Uncertainty , 2005 .

[15]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  An Approach for Robust Micro-Scale Materials Design under Unparameterizable Variability , 2004 .

[16]  Geoffrey Ingram Taylor,et al.  The use of flat-ended projectiles for determining dynamic yield stress I. Theoretical considerations , 1948, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[17]  S. Morgenthaler Robustness in Statistics , 2001 .

[18]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  An Approach for Robust Design of Reactive Power Metal Mixtures Based on Non-deterministic Micro-scale Shock Simulation , 2005 .

[19]  Ronald A. Howard,et al.  Information Value Theory , 1966, IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybern..

[20]  Carolyn Conner Seepersad,et al.  The utility-based compromise decision support problem with applications in product platform design , 2001 .

[21]  A. Merzhanov,et al.  On critical conditions for thermal explosion of a hot spot , 1966 .

[22]  David Cebon,et al.  Materials Selection in Mechanical Design , 1992 .

[23]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Metrics for Assessing Design Freedom and Information Certainty in the Early Stages of Design , 1998 .

[24]  S Kafandaris,et al.  The Economic Value of Information , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[25]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  THE COMPROMISE DECISION SUPPORT PROBLEM AND THE ADAPTIVE LINEAR PROGRAMMING ALGORITHM , 1998 .

[26]  N. Patel,et al.  Intermediate Strain Rate Behavior of Two Structural Energetic Materials , 2004 .

[27]  G. Box Robustness in the Strategy of Scientific Model Building. , 1979 .

[28]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Reasoning about the Value of Decision-Model Refinement: Methods and Application , 1993, UAI.

[29]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Robust concept exploration methods in materials design , 2002 .