The dynamics of IT adoption in a major change process in healthcare delivery

The main objective of the study is to comprehend the dynamics of interactions between partners (caregivers, promoters, consultants, patients and managers) involved in the implementation process of an integrated delivery system designed to support the treatment of women with breast cancer. Preliminary findings permit to identify adoption/resistance factors at individual, professional and organizational levels in addition to technological factors. They give insights on the challenges to be faced when redesigning work processes in an interorganizational setting. Significant adoption factors include individual participation to the project and positive assessment of benefits of the system by individuals as well as by professional groups. On the other hand, the absence of a multidisciplinary committee and the complexity of the environment, the tasks and the technology are among the factors identified as troublesome. In terms of the dynamics of the process, our observation reveals that promoters have adopted a contingent and political approach. While this strategy is usually considered appropriate in healthcare organizations, information generated by this study has allowed for a better understanding of important factors and mechanisms to consider and address in the subsequent phases of implementation.

[1]  Liette Lapointe L'adoption de systèmes d'information cliniques par les mèdecins et les infirmières : une ètude des variables individuelles, socio-politiques et organisationnelles , 1998 .

[2]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[3]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[4]  Bonnie Kaplan Initial impact of a clinical laboratory computer system , 2004, Journal of Medical Systems.

[5]  유창조 Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[6]  Henri Barki,et al.  Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use , 1994 .

[7]  Kailash Joshi,et al.  A Model of Users' Perspective on Change: The Case of Information Systems Technology Implementation , 1991, MIS Q..

[8]  Stuart L. Hart,et al.  An Integrative Framework for Strategy-Making Processes , 1992 .

[9]  J. Denis,et al.  Devenir leader dans une organisation complexe 1 , 1996 .

[10]  Kjell Grønhaug,et al.  iT-enabled Redesign of Complex and Dynamic Business Processes: the Case of Bank Credit Evaluation , 1997 .

[11]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Champions of Technological Innovation. , 1990 .

[13]  Merilee S. Grindle,et al.  One. Policy Content and Context in Implementation , 1980 .

[14]  S M Shortell,et al.  Creating organized delivery systems: the barriers and facilitators. , 1993, Hospital & health services administration.

[15]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Integrating Diffusion of Innovations and Theory of Reasoned Action models to predict utilization of information technology by end-users , 1996 .

[16]  A. Strauss,et al.  Psychiatric Ideologies and Institutions , 1981 .

[17]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Leadership behaviors, influence tactics, and career experiences of champions of technological innovation , 1990 .

[18]  Merilee S. Grindle Politics and Policy Implementation in the Third World , 1980 .

[19]  Jean-Louis Denis,et al.  Leadership and Strategic Change under Ambiguity , 1996 .

[20]  M. Lynn Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1996 .

[21]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .