The use of retraction paste to simplify impression and cementation of ceramic veneers and crowns: 3-year follow-up report.

Proper gingival displacement is an important prerequisite to obtain good quality impressions. Retraction pastes could eliminate the need for retraction cords, as they have advantages such as comfort reported by patients, faster technique, ease of use, no need for anesthesia, and reduced tissue trauma. The objective of this paper was to present a clinical case of ceramic veneers and crowns in which a retraction paste was used for gingival displacement during both the impression and cementation stages, with 3 years of follow-up. Treatment planning consisted of the replacement of preexisting crowns and ceramic veneers on the anterior teeth. After finishing the preparations, gingival displacement with Astringent Retraction Paste was performed without anesthesia or the use of cords and the impression was taken. Before cementation of the crowns and veneers, the Astringent Retraction Paste was applied. Avoiding the use of cords during cementation prevented trauma. The soft tissue margins remained stable and healthy after a period of 3 years. It can be concluded that retraction pastes could be indicated for displacement of soft tissue when preparation margins are at the gingival level or slightly intrasulcular prior to impressions, restoration cementations, direct restorations, and before relining provisional restorations. Clinical significance: The impression appointment can be traumatic to some patients. The use of cords for gingival displacement usually requires local anesthesia and is time consuming. Retraction astringent pastes instead of cords seems to be a good option for some cases in gingival tissue displacement.

[1]  Sheng-Bing Huang,et al.  Influence of gingival retraction paste versus cord on periodontal health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2019, Quintessence international.

[2]  Jorge Garaicoa,et al.  Dental Impression Materials and Techniques. , 2017, Dental clinics of North America.

[3]  J. V. Mohadeb,et al.  Efficiency of Cordless Versus Cord Techniques of Gingival Retraction: A Systematic Review , 2017, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[4]  A. Raigrodski Soft Tissue Management: The Restorative Perspective: Putting Concepts into Practice , 2015 .

[5]  Galip Gurel,et al.  The influence of tooth color on preparation design for laminate veneers from a minimally invasive perspective: case report. , 2014, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[6]  Erdem Ozdemir,et al.  A clinical comparison of cordless and conventional displacement systems regarding clinical performance and impression quality. , 2014, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  F. Demarco,et al.  A double-blind randomised clinical trial of two techniques for gingival displacement. , 2014, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[8]  C. Goodacre,et al.  Gingival displacement for impression making in fixed prosthodontics: contemporary principles, materials, and techniques. , 2014, Dental clinics of North America.

[9]  Jerry Woolsey Esthetic Rehabil‐itation in Fixed Prosthodontics: Volume 1‐Esthetic Analysis: A Systemic Approach to Prosthetic Treatment , 2006 .

[10]  M. Fradeani,et al.  Porcelain laminate veneers: 6- to 12-year clinical evaluation--a retrospective study. , 2005, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[11]  Terry E Donovan,et al.  Current concepts in gingival displacement. , 2004, Dental clinics of North America.

[12]  M. Fradeani Esthetic analysis : a systematic approach to prosthetic treatment , 2004 .

[13]  S. Dunne,et al.  The Science and Art of Porcelain Laminate Veneers , 2003, British Dental Journal.

[14]  A. Shannon Expanded clinical uses of a novel tissue-retraction material. , 2002, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.

[15]  Stephen Poss,et al.  An innovative tissue-retraction material. , 2002, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.

[16]  M. Fradeani Six-year follow-up with Empress veneers. , 1998, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[17]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Five-year clinical performance of porcelain veneers. , 1998, Quintessence international.

[18]  B. Laufer,et al.  The closure of the gingival crevice following gingival retraction for impression making. , 1997, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[19]  H S Cardash,et al.  The linear accuracy of impressions and stone dies as affected by the thickness of the impression margin. , 1994, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[20]  N P Lang,et al.  Clinical and microbiological effects of subgingival restorations with overhanging or clinically perfect margins. , 1983, Journal of clinical periodontology.