School Custodians and Green Cleaners

Coalitions between labor unions and environmental organizations often dissolve in class tensions that appear to force unions to choose between job security and occupational or environmental health. This article examines a successful blue—green coalition that worked to substitute cleaning products used in Boston public schools with safer alternatives. The coalition succeeded in part through the role of bridge builders, who unified a diverse group of stakeholders, including community and environmental health advocates, labor activists and labor unionists, and school administrators, to discuss their individual and common interests in eliminating toxic chemicals from the school environment. This article also explores the framing strategies used by the coalition partners, especially the logic of the precautionary principle in bridging the concerns of the environmental activists with the safety and health concerns of the union. This case raises questions of how coalition strategies and tactics may bear on the success of blue—green coalitions.

[1]  Robert Gottlieb Environmentalism Unbound: Exploring New Pathways for Change , 2001 .

[2]  Derek G Shendell,et al.  Science-based recommendations to prevent or reduce potential exposure to biological, chemical, and physical agents in schools. , 2004, The Journal of school health.

[3]  D. Croteau,et al.  Coalition Framing and the Challenge of a Consonant Frame Pyramid: The Case of a Collaborative Response to Homelessness , 2003 .

[4]  G. Heath,et al.  Do indoor pollutants and thermal conditions in schools influence student performance? A critical review of the literature. , 2005, Indoor air.

[5]  D. Snow,et al.  Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment , 2000 .

[6]  Tammy L. Lewis,et al.  Blue-Green Coalitions: Constraints and Possibilities in the Post 9-11 Political Environment , 2004 .

[7]  B. Robnett,et al.  African-American Women in the Civil Rights Movement, 1954-1965: Gender, Leadership, and Micromobilization , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  M. Diani,et al.  Social Movements: An Introduction , 1998 .

[9]  P. Brown,et al.  Moving Further Upstream: From Toxics Reduction to the Precautionary Principle , 2002 .

[10]  S. Condon,et al.  Tracking Pediatric Asthma:The Massachusetts Experience Using School Health Records , 2004, Environmental health perspectives.

[11]  R. Levins,et al.  The precautionary principle in environmental science. , 2001, Environmental health perspectives.

[12]  L. Davis,et al.  Work-related asthma among health care workers: surveillance data from California, Massachusetts, Michigan, and New Jersey, 1993-1997. , 2005, American journal of industrial medicine.

[13]  Brian K. Obach New Labor , 2004 .

[14]  I. Bernstein,et al.  A combined respiratory and cutaneous hypersensitivity syndrome induced by work exposure to quaternary amines. , 1994, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[15]  Robert Gottlieb,et al.  Forcing the Spring: The Transformation of the American Environmental Movement , 1993 .

[16]  M. Kopferschmitt‐Kubler,et al.  Quaternary ammonium compounds and occupational asthma , 2000, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[17]  F. Rose Coalitions across the Class Divide: Lessons from the Labor, Peace, and Environmental Movements , 1999 .

[18]  D. Clawson,et al.  The Next Upsurge: Labor and the New Social Movements , 2003 .

[19]  Brian K. Obach Labor and the Environmental Movement: The Quest for Common Ground , 2004 .