Seismic Ground Response Analysis of Some Typical Sites of Guwahati City

In this study, one dimensional equivalent–linear ground response analyses were performed for some typical sites in the Guwahati city, India. Six bore locations covering about 250 km2 area of the city were considered for the analyses. As the strong motion significantly influences the ground response, seven different recorded ground motions, varying in magnitude (6.1 to 8.1) and other ground motion parameters, were adopted. Seismic site analyses were carried out for all layers of borelogs using all the seven earthquakes. Results are presented in terms of surface acceleration histories, strain and shear stress ratio variation, response spectrum, Fourier amplitude ratio versus frequency. The results indicate that accelerations were amplified the most at the surface level. The range of peak ground acceleration (PGA) values obtained at the ground surface is about 0.2 g to 0.79 for a range of PGA considered at bedrock level (rigid half space at bottom of borelog) of 0.1 g to 0.34 g. The Fourier amplifications of ground motion at surface are in the range of 4.14 – 8.99 for a frequency band of 1.75 Hz to 3.13 Hz. The maximum spectral acceleration at six locations varies in the range of 1.0 g – 4.71 g for all the seven earthquakes. The study clearly demonstrated the role for site effect and the type of ground motion on the ground response. For a given earthquake motion, amplification factors at surface level change by almost about 20% to 70% depending on local site conditions.

[1]  S. Dash,et al.  Ground motion estimation at Guwahati city for an Mw 8.1 earthquake in the Shillong plateau , 2008 .

[2]  R. Ulusay,et al.  Empirical correlations between shear wave velocity and penetration resistance for ground shaking assessments , 2007 .

[3]  R. Dobry,et al.  Effect of Soil Plasticity on Cyclic Response , 1991 .

[4]  P. Anbazhagan,et al.  Review of correlations between SPT N and shear modulus: A new correlation applicable to any region , 2012 .

[5]  K. S. Thingbaijam,et al.  Assessment of Seismic Site Conditions: a Case Study from Guwahati City, Northeast India , 2011 .

[6]  Youssef M A Hashash,et al.  Non-linear one-dimensional seismic ground motion propagation in the Mississippi embayment , 2001 .

[7]  S. Dash,et al.  Deterministic seismic scenarios for North East India , 2010 .

[8]  S. Dash,et al.  Evaluation of seismic soil-liquefaction at Guwahati city , 2010 .

[9]  Site Amplification, Qs, and Source Parameterization in Guwahati Region from Seismic and Geotechnical Analysis , 2008 .

[10]  S. Raghukanth,et al.  Surface level ground motion estimation for 1869 Cachar earthquake (Mw 7.5) at Imphal city , 2010 .

[11]  P. B. Schnabel SHAKE-A Computer Program for Earthquake Response Analysis of Horizontally Layered Sites , 1970 .

[12]  K. K. S. Thingbaijam,et al.  Earthquake hazard in Northeast India — A seismic microzonation approach with typical case studies from Sikkim Himalaya and Guwahati city , 2008 .

[13]  Y. Hashash,et al.  Recent Advances in Non-Linear Site Response Analysis , 2010 .

[14]  N. Ambraseys,et al.  Reevaluated Intensities for the Great Assam Earthquake of 12 June 1897, Shillong, India , 2003 .

[15]  H. C. Goswami,et al.  Probabilistic earthquake expectancy in the northeast Indian region , 1982 .

[16]  A. Boominathan,et al.  Use of Surface Waves in Statistical Correlations of Shear Wave Velocity and Penetration Resistance of Chennai Soils , 2010 .

[17]  M. Wyss,et al.  Precursory variation of seismicity rate in the Assam area, India. [150 years] , 1978 .

[18]  Youssef M A Hashash,et al.  SOIL DAMPING FORMULATION IN NONLINEAR TIME DOMAIN SITE RESPONSE ANALYSIS , 2004 .

[19]  S. Raghukanth Simulation of Strong Ground Motion During the 1950 Great Assam Earthquake , 2008 .

[20]  B. Sukhija,et al.  The great 1950 Assam Earthquake revisited: Field evidences of liquefaction and search for paleoseismic events , 2008 .