The role of sensor measurements in treating mastitis on farms with an automatic milking system

Mastitis detection is aimed at finding cows with clinical mastitis (CM) so they can be treated. Farmers with an automatic milking system (AMS) rely on mastitis alert lists, generated by the AMS, to detect cows with CM. These lists are based on sensor measurements collected during milking. Mastitis detection models with sufficiently high sensitivity and specificity will help to select the CM cases that need treatment. The current CM detection performance can be summarized with a sensitivity of 36.8% and a specificity of 97.9%. These values don’t meet the suggested requirements on CM detection performance (sensitivity >70%, specificity >99%). Recent research was able to improve detection performance by using better detection algorithms, adding non-sensor information, and using new or improved sensors. The achieved sensitivity and specificity, however, were still not perfect. This imperfection may be explained by the fact that the majority of the alerts are from cows with intramammary infections. Some of these cows will develop CM, but the majority will not become clinically infected. Therefore, reaching a very high specificity (e.g. 100%) for CM detection is very difficult, and it is expected that future CM detection models on an AMS will not be perfect. As a consequence, farmers with AMS have to accept that not all CM cases will be detected, that some cases will be detected late, and that there will be false-positive alerts. With this inevitable imperfect detection in mind, it is essential to start thinking about detection and treatment protocols for farmers with AMS. These protocols may include specific actions for new alerts and for alerts which are on the list for weeks. This paper can be seen as a starting point for a further debate on providing treatment protocols for farmers with AMS.

[1]  Joachim Krieter,et al.  Mastitis detection in dairy cows by application of fuzzy logic , 2006 .

[2]  H Hogeveen,et al.  Detection of clinical mastitis with sensor data from automatic milking systems is improved by using decision-tree induction. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  Herman Mollenhorst,et al.  Sensors and Clinical Mastitis—The Quest for the Perfect Alert , 2010, Italian National Conference on Sensors.

[4]  Henk Hogeveen,et al.  Performance evaluation of systems for automated monitoring of udder health: analytical issues and guidelines , 2008 .

[5]  L. C. van der Gaag,et al.  Simplify the interpretation of alert lists for clinical mastitis in automatic milking systems , 2010 .

[6]  H Hogeveen,et al.  Sensors and management support in high-technology milking. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[7]  R. Huirne,et al.  The influence of cow factors on the incidence of clinical mastitis in dairy cows. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  T. Larsen,et al.  Estimating degree of mastitis from time-series measurements in milk: a test of a model based on lactate dehydrogenase measurements. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  Induction of Decision Trees , 1986, Machine Learning.

[10]  G. A. Mein,et al.  Performance evaluation of systems for automated monitoring of udder health: would the real gold standard please stand up? , 2008 .

[11]  Joachim Krieter,et al.  Mastitis detection in dairy cows by application of neural networks , 2008 .

[12]  W Ouweltjes,et al.  Detection model for mastitis in cows milked in an automatic milking system. , 2001, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[13]  W Steeneveld,et al.  Discriminating between true-positive and false-positive clinical mastitis alerts from automatic milking systems. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  de Koning,et al.  Automatic milking – common practice on dairy farms , 2010 .

[15]  W. Steeneveld Decision support for mastitis on farms with an automatic milking system , 2006 .

[16]  P. T. Johnstone,et al.  An automated in-line clinical mastitis detection system using measurement of conductivity from foremilk of individual udder quarters , 2009, New Zealand veterinary journal.

[17]  H Hogeveen,et al.  Bioeconomic modeling of lactational antimicrobial treatment of new bovine subclinical intramammary infections caused by contagious pathogens. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  H Hogeveen,et al.  Automatic detection of clinical mastitis is improved by in-line monitoring of somatic cell count. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.