Online prediction of beef tenderness using a computer vision system equipped with a BeefCam module.

Four experiments were conducted in two commercial packing plants to evaluate the effectiveness of a commercial online video image analysis (VIA) system (the Computer Vision System equipped with a BeefCam module [CVS BeefCam]) to predict tenderness of beef steaks using online measurements obtained at chain speeds. Longissimus muscle (LM) samples from the rib (Exp. 1, 2, and 4) or strip loin (Exp. 3) were obtained from each carcass and Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF) was measured after 14 d of aging. The CVS BeefCam output variable for LM area, adjusted for carcass weight (cm2/kg), was correlated (P < 0.05) with WBSF values in all experiments. The CVS BeefCam lean color measurements, a* and b*, were effective (P < 0.05) in all experiments for segregating carcasses into groups that produced LM steaks differing in WBSF values. Fat color measurements by CVS BeefCam were usually ineffective for segregating carcasses into groups differing in WBSF values; however, in Exp. 4, fat b* identified a group of carcasses that produced tough LM steaks. Quality grade factors accounted for 3, 18, 21, and 0% of the variation in WBSF among steaks in Exp. 1 (n = 399), 2 (n = 195), 3 (n = 304), and 4 (n = 184), respectively, whereas CVS BeefCam output variables accounted for 17, 30, 19, and 6% of the variation in WBSF among steaks in Exp. 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. A multiple linear regression equation developed with data from Exp. 2 accurately classified carcasses in Exp. 1 and 4 and thereby may be useful for decreasing the likelihood that a consumer would encounter a tough (WBSF > 4.5 kg) LM steak in a group classified as "tender" by CVS BeefCam compared with an unsorted population. Online measurements of beef carcasses by use of CVS BeefCam were useful for predicting the tenderness of beef LM steaks, and sorting carcasses using these measurements could aid in producing groups of beef carcasses with more uniform LM steak tenderness.

[1]  D. S. Hale,et al.  National Beef Tenderness Survey-1998. , 2000, Journal of animal science.

[2]  J D Tatum,et al.  Using objective measures of muscle color to predict beef longissimus tenderness. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[3]  J. D. Tatum,et al.  An evaluation of current and alternative systems for quality grading carcasses of mature slaughter cows. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[4]  L. D. Van Vleck,et al.  Prediction of crude fat content of longissimus muscle of beef using the ratio of fat area calculated from computer image analysis: comparison of regression equations for prediction using different input devices at different stations. , 2000, Journal of animal science.

[5]  J D Tatum,et al.  Online evaluation of a commercial video image analysis system (Computer Vision System) to predict beef carcass red meat yield and for augmenting the assignment of USDA yield grades. United States Department of Agriculture. , 2002, Journal of animal science.

[6]  J. B. Morgan,et al.  Effects of animal age, marbling score, calpastatin activity, subprimal cut, calcium injection, and degree of doneness on the palatability of steaks from limousin steers. , 1996, Journal of animal science.

[7]  D. Wulf,et al.  Measuring muscle color on beef carcasses using the L*a*b* color space. , 1999, Journal of animal science.

[8]  H. Heymann,et al.  Image texture features as indicators of beef tenderness. , 1999, Meat science.

[9]  J. B. Morgan,et al.  IDENTIFICATION OF THRESHOLD LEVELS FOR WARNER-BRATZLER SHEAR FORCE IN BEEF TOP LOIN STEAKS , 1991 .

[10]  G. W. Davis,et al.  RELATIONSHIP OF USDA MARBLING GROUPS TO PALATABILITY OF COOKED BEEF , 1985 .

[11]  J. Tan,et al.  Beef Marbling and Color Score Determination by Image Processing , 1996 .

[12]  S. Shackelford,et al.  Cooking and palatability traits of beef longissimus steaks cooked with a belt grill or an open hearth electric broiler. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[13]  D. Wulf,et al.  A survey of beef muscle color and pH. , 2001, Journal of animal science.

[14]  J D Tatum,et al.  Identification of quality management practices to reduce the incidence of retail beef tenderness problems: development and evaluation of a prototype quality system to produce tender beef. , 1999, Journal of animal science.

[15]  D. Wulf,et al.  Using measurements of muscle color, pH, and electrical impedance to augment the current USDA beef quality grading standards and improve the accuracy and precision of sorting carcasses into palatability groups. , 2000, Journal of animal science.