Diagnosis process with two focuses minimal in incoherent mapping repair

Ontology Matching is a process to find correspondences between semantically related entities of two ontologies. Most matching systems do evaluation by comparing the correspondences with reference alignment. Since 2010 another method has been used to measure a logic-based of correspondence or mapping, called incoherent mapping measurement. The more incoherent of the mapping the lower quality of mapping. Incoherent mapping repair will restore the incoherent to coherent condition in mapping, by removing unwanted mapping. The process of removing unwanted mapping to restore the coherent condition is called diagnosis process. Since mappings are very important sources to support data integration and exchange, then diagnosis should be done as minimal as possible. We propose two focuses minimal using global new technique to repair the incoherent mapping. This approach should (1) ensure minimal impact on the input alignment by minimizing the number of mapping removed; and (2) minimize the average of confidence values of the mapping removed. The next study about minimal diagnosis is finding the right method to implement the two focuses minimal with global new techniques in the real world.

[1]  Bernardo Cuenca Grau,et al.  LogMap: Logic-Based and Scalable Ontology Matching , 2011, SEMWEB.

[2]  Benhard Sitohang,et al.  Comparisons of diagnosis in mapping repair systems , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Data and Software Engineering (ICoDSE).

[3]  Christian Meilicke,et al.  Alignment incoherence in ontology matching , 2011 .

[4]  Benhard Sitohang,et al.  Minimizing the estimated solution cost with A∗ search to support minimal mapping repair , 2017, 2017 4th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Informatics (EECSI).

[5]  Heiner Stuckenschmidt,et al.  A Practical Implementation of Semantic Precision and Recall , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems.

[6]  Benhard Sitohang,et al.  Minimizing the estimated solution cost with A∗ search to support minimal mapping repair , 2017 .

[7]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  Evaluating Mapping Repair Systems with Large Biomedical Ontologies , 2013, Description Logics.

[8]  Emanuel Santos,et al.  To repair or not to repair: reconciling correctness and coherence in ontology reference alignments , 2013, OM.

[9]  Heiner Stuckenschmidt,et al.  Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2007 , 2006, OM.

[10]  Emanuel Santos,et al.  Ontology Alignment Repair through Modularization and Confidence-Based Heuristics , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  Jérôme Euzenat,et al.  Ontology Matching: State of the Art and Future Challenges , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[12]  Heiner Stuckenschmidt,et al.  Incoherence as a Basis for Measuring the Quality of Ontology Mappings , 2008, OM.

[13]  Benhard Sitohang,et al.  Review of ontology matching with background knowledge , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Data and Software Engineering (ICoDSE).

[14]  Catia Pesquita,et al.  Towards Annotating Potential Incoherences in BioPortal Mappings , 2014, SEMWEB.

[15]  Benhard Sitohang,et al.  PENINGKATAN INTERLINKING PADA LINKED DATA HETEROGEN MELALUI ONTOLOGY ALIGNMENT , 2016 .

[16]  Emanuel Santos,et al.  The AgreementMakerLight Ontology Matching System , 2013, OTM Conferences.