QoI-aware energy management in Internet-of-Things sensory environments

Considering physical sensors with certain sensing capabilities in an Internet-of-Things (IoT) sensory environment, in this paper, we propose an efficient energy management framework to control the duty cycles of these sensors under quality-of-information (QoI) experience in a multi-task-oriented IoT sensory environment. Contrary to past research efforts, our proposal is transparent and compatible both with the underlying low-layer protocols and diverse applications, and preserving energy-efficiency in the long run without sacrificing the QoI levels attained. Specifically, we first introduce the novel concept of QoI-aware “sensor-to-task relevancy” to explicitly consider the sensing capabilities offered by an sensor to the IoT sensory environments, and QoI requirements required by a task. Second, we propose a novel concept of the “critical covering set” of any given task in selecting the sensors to service a task over time. Third, energy management decision is made dynamically at runtime, to reach the optimum for long-term application arrivals and departures under the constraint of their service delay. Finally, an extensive case study based on utilizing the sensing sensors to perform water quality monitoring is given to demonstrate the ideas and algorithms proposed in this paper, and a complete simulation is made to support all performance analysis.

[1]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[2]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[3]  Kin K. Leung,et al.  QoI-Aware Wireless Sensor Network Management for Dynamic Multi-Task Operations , 2010, 2010 7th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON).

[4]  Di Tian,et al.  A coverage-preserving node scheduling scheme for large wireless sensor networks , 2002, WSNA '02.

[5]  Mani B. Srivastava,et al.  Quality Tradeoffs in Object Tracking with Duty-Cycled Sensor Networks , 2010, 2010 31st IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium.

[6]  H. T. Mouftah,et al.  The internet of things [Guest Editorial] , 2011, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[7]  Koen Langendoen,et al.  An adaptive energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks , 2003, SenSys '03.

[8]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Sensor Networks , 2002, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[9]  Mani B. Srivastava,et al.  Building principles for a quality of information specification for sensor information , 2009, 2009 12th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[10]  K.C. Chang,et al.  Quality of information for data fusion in net centric publish and subscribe architectures , 2005, 2005 7th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[11]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  R. Pyke Markov renewal processes: Definitions and preliminary properties , 1961 .

[13]  Kin K. Leung,et al.  A letter soup for the quality of information in sensor networks , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications.