Bayesian Forecast Evaluation and Ensemble Earthquake Forecasting

The assessment of earthquake forecast models for practical purposes requires more than simply checking model consistency in a statistical framework. One also needs to understand how to construct the best model for specific forecasting applications. We describe a Bayesian approach to evaluating earthquake forecasting models, and we consider related procedures for constructing ensemble forecasts. We show how evaluations based on Bayes factors, which measure the relative skill among forecasts, can be complementary to common goodness‐of‐fit tests used to measure the absolute consistency of forecasts with data. To construct ensemble forecasts, we consider averages across a forecast set, weighted by either posterior probabilities or inverse log‐likelihoods derived during prospective earthquake forecasting experiments. We account for model correlations by conditioning weights using the Garthwaite–Mubwandarikwa capped eigenvalue scheme. We apply these methods to the Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models (RELM) five‐year earthquake forecast experiment in California, and we discuss how this approach can be generalized to other ensemble forecasting applications. Specific applications of seismological importance include experiments being conducted within the Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability (CSEP) and ensemble methods for operational earthquake forecasting. Online Material: Tables of likelihoods for each testing phase and code to analyze the RELM experiment.

[1]  Danijel Schorlemmer,et al.  RELM Testing Center , 2007 .

[2]  Danijel Schorlemmer,et al.  ALM: An Asperity-based Likelihood Model for California , 2007 .

[3]  George E. P. Box,et al.  Empirical Model‐Building and Response Surfaces , 1988 .

[4]  S. Wiemer,et al.  Earthquake Likelihood Model Testing , 2007 .

[5]  J. D. Zechar,et al.  Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models I: First-Order Results , 2013 .

[6]  J. Douglas Zechar,et al.  Simple smoothed seismicity earthquake forecasts for Italy , 2010 .

[7]  David Vere-Jones,et al.  Forecasting earthquakes and earthquake risk , 1995 .

[8]  Matthew C. Gerstenberger,et al.  New Zealand Earthquake Forecast Testing Centre , 2010 .

[9]  Derek J. Pike,et al.  Empirical Model‐building and Response Surfaces. , 1988 .

[10]  Edward H. Field,et al.  Overview of the Working Group for the Development of Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models (RELM) , 2005 .

[11]  Danijel Schorlemmer,et al.  First Results of the Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models Experiment , 2010 .

[12]  Robert J. Budnitz,et al.  Recommendations for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: Guidance on uncertainty and use of experts , 1997 .

[13]  H. Goldstein Multilevel Statistical Models , 2006 .

[14]  Richard P. Feynman,et al.  The Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability: Perspectives on Evaluation & Testing for Seismic Hazard , 2010 .

[15]  Tony R. Martinez,et al.  Turning Bayesian model averaging into Bayesian model combination , 2011, The 2011 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[16]  Stefan Wiemer,et al.  Are short‐term evacuations warranted? Case of the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake , 2010 .

[17]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[18]  Warner Marzocchi,et al.  The Assumption of Poisson Seismic-Rate Variability in CSEP/RELM Experiments , 2010 .

[19]  H. Jeffreys,et al.  Theory of probability , 1896 .

[20]  Kristy F. Tiampo,et al.  A RELM earthquake forecast based on pattern informatics , 2005 .

[21]  Philip J. Maechling,et al.  The Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability perspective on computational earthquake science , 2010 .

[22]  Jenny A. Baglivo,et al.  Non-Poissonian Earthquake Clustering and the Hidden Markov Model as Bases for Earthquake Forecasting in California , 2007 .

[23]  David A. Rhoades,et al.  Efficient testing of earthquake forecasting models , 2011 .

[24]  Gerassimos A. Papadopoulos,et al.  OPERATIONAL EARTHQUAKE FORECASTING. State of Knowledge and Guidelines for Utilization , 2011 .

[25]  T. Jordan Earthquake Predictability, Brick by Brick , 2006 .

[26]  W. W. Rozeboom The fallacy of the null-hypothesis significance test. , 1960, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  J. D. Zechar,et al.  Likelihood-Based Tests for Evaluating Space–Rate–Magnitude Earthquake Forecasts , 2009 .

[28]  Thomas H. Jordan,et al.  Operational Earthquake Forecasting: Some Thoughts on Why and How , 2010 .

[29]  Maximilian J. Werner,et al.  Magnitude uncertainties impact seismic rate estimates, forecasts, and predictability experiments , 2007, 0710.4196.

[30]  Y. Kagan,et al.  High-resolution Time-independent Grid-based Forecast for M ≥ 5 Earthquakes in California , 2007 .

[31]  Warner Marzocchi,et al.  A Ten-Year Earthquake Occurrence Model for Italy , 2012 .

[32]  James R. Thompson Empirical Model Building , 1989 .

[33]  D. S. Sivia,et al.  Data Analysis , 1996, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[34]  S. Wiemer,et al.  A retrospective comparative forecast test on the 1992 Landers sequence , 2011 .

[35]  N Oreskes,et al.  Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences , 1994, Science.

[36]  J. Douglas Zechar,et al.  Earthquake Forecasting and Earthquake Prediction: Different Approaches for Obtaining the Best Model , 2011 .

[37]  David A. Rhoades,et al.  Mixture Models for Improved Short-Term Earthquake Forecasting , 2009 .

[38]  P. Garthwaite,et al.  SELECTION OF WEIGHTS FOR WEIGHTED MODEL AVERAGING , 2010 .

[39]  Naoshi Hirata,et al.  Overview of the first earthquake forecast testing experiment in Japan , 2011 .

[40]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial (with comments by M. Clyde, David Draper and E. I. George, and a rejoinder by the authors , 1999 .

[41]  David Vere-Jones,et al.  The Entropy Score and its Uses in Earthquake Forecasting , 2005 .