Excitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex does not affect perceptual filling-in in healthy volunteers

[1]  M. Hamilton A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION , 1960, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[2]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[3]  D. Scott Perceptual learning. , 1974, Queen's nursing journal.

[4]  J. Fuster,et al.  Prefrontal Cortex and the Bridging of Temporal Gaps in the Perception‐Action Cycle , 1990, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[5]  J M Fuster,et al.  The prefrontal cortex and its relation to behavior. , 1991, Progress in brain research.

[6]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Induction of speech arrest and counting errors with rapid‐rate transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1991, Neurology.

[7]  U. Polat,et al.  Lateral interactions between spatial channels: Suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments , 1993, Vision Research.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex dysfunction in the major psychoses; symptom or disease specificity? , 1993, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[9]  Claude Bonnet,et al.  Psychophysical measures of illusory form perception: Further evidence for local mechanisms , 1993, Vision Research.

[10]  A. Karni,et al.  The time course of learning a visual skill , 1993, Nature.

[11]  U Polat,et al.  Spatial interactions in human vision: from near to far via experience-dependent cascades of connections. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  U. Polat,et al.  The architecture of perceptual spatial interactions , 1994, Vision Research.

[13]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  On the perception of illusory contours , 1994, Vision Research.

[14]  D. Tanné,et al.  Perceptual learning: learning to see , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[15]  M Petrides,et al.  Impairments on nonspatial self-ordered and externally ordered working memory tasks after lesions of the mid-dorsal part of the lateral frontal cortex in the monkey , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  P. Goldman-Rakic The prefrontal landscape: implications of functional architecture for understanding human mentation and the central executive. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[17]  D. Sagi,et al.  Excitatory-inhibitory network in the visual cortex: psychophysical evidence. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  M. Hallett,et al.  Depression of motor cortex excitability by low‐frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1997, Neurology.

[19]  L. Pessoa,et al.  Finding out about filling-in: a guide to perceptual completion for visual science and the philosophy of perception. , 1998, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[20]  D. Sagi,et al.  Effects of spatial configuration on contrast detection , 1998, Vision Research.

[21]  U. Polat Functional architecture of long-range perceptual interactions. , 1999, Spatial vision.

[22]  D. Pandya,et al.  Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: comparative cytoarchitectonic analysis in the human and the macaque brain and corticocortical connection patterns , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.

[23]  S H Lisanby,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Applications in Neuropsychiatry , 1999 .

[24]  E M Wassermann,et al.  Cognitive effects of 1- and 20-hertz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression: preliminary report. , 2000, Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and behavioral neurology.

[25]  M. Morgan,et al.  Facilitation from collinear flanks is cancelled by non-collinear flanks , 2000, Vision Research.

[26]  W. Drevets Neuroimaging studies of mood disorders , 2000, Biological Psychiatry.

[27]  A Gorea,et al.  Failure to handle more than one internal representation in visual detection tasks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  D. Sagi,et al.  Recurrent networks in human visual cortex: psychophysical evidence. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[29]  James B. Rowe,et al.  Working Memory for Location and Time: Activity in Prefrontal Area 46 Relates to Selection Rather than Maintenance in Memory , 2001, NeuroImage.

[30]  Vyacheslav P. Tuzlukov,et al.  Signal detection theory , 2001 .

[31]  Jon Driver,et al.  Lateral interactions between targets and flankers in low-level vision depend on attention to the flankers , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  R. Duman,et al.  Pathophysiology of depression: the concept of synaptic plasticity , 2002, European Psychiatry.

[33]  Manfred Fahle,et al.  Perceptual learning: gain without pain? , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  D. Pandya,et al.  Comparative cytoarchitectonic analysis of the human and the macaque ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and corticocortical connection patterns in the monkey , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.

[35]  E. Peli,et al.  Lateral interactions: size does matter , 2002, Vision Research.

[36]  A. Gershon,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression. , 2003, The American journal of psychiatry.

[37]  S. Hochstein,et al.  The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  M. Fahle Perceptual learning: specificity versus generalization , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[39]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Involvement of human left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in perceptual decision making is independent of response modality , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  U. Mosimann,et al.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects divided attention immediately after cessation of stimulation. , 2006, Journal of psychiatric research.

[41]  P. Fitzgerald,et al.  A comprehensive review of the effects of rTMS on motor cortical excitability and inhibition , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[42]  Abraham Zangen,et al.  A randomized controlled feasibility and safety study of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[43]  Alon Amir,et al.  Three-Dimensional Distribution of the Electric Field Induced in the Brain by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Using Figure-8 and Deep H-Coils , 2007, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[44]  Uri Polat,et al.  The relationship between the subjective and objective aspects of visual filling-in , 2007, Vision Research.

[45]  H. Seo,et al.  Mechanisms of Reinforcement Learning and Decision Making in the Primate Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[46]  H. Seo,et al.  Dynamic signals related to choices and outcomes in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[47]  Lisa Koski,et al.  Report Brain Plasticity in the Adult: Modulation of Function in Amblyopia with Rtms , 2022 .

[48]  Gunter Loffler,et al.  Perception of contours and shapes: Low and intermediate stage mechanisms , 2008, Vision Research.

[49]  U. Polat,et al.  Major Depression Affects Perceptual Filling-In , 2008, Biological Psychiatry.

[50]  Uri Polat,et al.  Restoration of underdeveloped cortical functions: evidence from treatment of adult amblyopia. , 2008, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[51]  Uri Polat,et al.  Making perceptual learning practical to improve visual functions , 2009, Vision Research.

[52]  U. Polat Perceptual learning induces neuroplasticity, enabling improvement of visual functions , 2009 .

[53]  Michael Belkin,et al.  Learning to adapt: Dynamics of readaptation to geometrical distortions , 2010, Vision Research.

[54]  V. Lazzaro,et al.  Physiology of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human brain , 2010, Brain Stimulation.

[55]  Cláudio T. Silva,et al.  Effects of 10 Hz rTMS on the Neural Efficiency of Working Memory , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.