Different strategy of hand choice after learning of constant and incremental dynamical perturbation in arm reaching

In daily life, we encounter situations where we must quickly decide which hand to use for a motor action. Here, we investigated whether the hand chosen for a motor action varied over a short timescale (i.e., hours) with changes in arm dynamics. Participants performed a reaching task in which they moved a specified hand to reach a target on a virtual reality display. During the task, a resistive viscous force field was abruptly applied to only the dominant hand (DH). To evaluate changes in hand choice caused by this perturbation, participants performed an interleaved choice test in which they could freely choose either hand for reaching. Furthermore, to investigate the effect of temporal changes on arm dynamics and hand choice, we exposed the same participants to another condition in which the force field was introduced gradually. When the abrupt force was applied, use of the perturbed hand significantly decreased and not changed during the training. In contrast, when the incremental force was applied, use of the perturbed hand gradually decreased as force increased. Surprisingly, even though the final amount of force was identical between the two conditions, hand choice was significantly biased toward the unperturbed hand in the gradual condition. These results suggest that time-varying changes in arm dynamics may have a greater influence on hand choice than the amplitude of the resistant force itself.

[1]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Adaptation to gradual as compared with sudden visuo-motor distortions , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Internal models in the cerebellum , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[6]  Marc H. Schieber,et al.  Inactivation of the ventral premotor cortex biases the laterality of motoric choices , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  Stephen H. Scott,et al.  Apparatus for measuring and perturbing shoulder and elbow joint positions and torques during reaching , 1999, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[8]  J. Liepert,et al.  Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. , 2000, Stroke.

[9]  Annette Sterr,et al.  Neurobehavioral aspects of recovery: assessment of the learned nonuse phenomenon in hemiparetic adolescents. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Reaching to ipsilateral or contralateral targets: within-hemisphere visuomotor processing cannot explain hemispatial differences in motor control , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  D. Ostry,et al.  Is Interlimb Transfer of Force-Field Adaptation a Cognitive Response to the Sudden Introduction of Load? , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  J. D. Fisk,et al.  The organization of eye and limb movements during unrestricted reaching to targets in contralateral and ipsilateral visual space , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  L. E. Rohr,et al.  Reaching patterns across working space: The effects of handedness, task demands, and comfort levels , 2006, Laterality.

[14]  A. Bastian Learning to predict the future: the cerebellum adapts feedforward movement control , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[15]  Yves Rossetti,et al.  Enhancing Visuomotor Adaptation by Reducing Error Signals: Single-step (Aware) versus Multiple-step (Unaware) Exposure to Wedge Prisms , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  J. Krakauer,et al.  A computational neuroanatomy for motor control , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  Reach adaptation: what determines whether we learn an internal model of the tool or adapt the model of our arm? , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Etienne Burdet,et al.  Dissociating Variability and Effort as Determinants of Coordination , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[19]  Vincent S. Huang,et al.  Persistence of motor memories reflects statistics of the learning event. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Temporal Discounting of Reward and the Cost of Time in Motor Control , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Olivier White,et al.  Use-Dependent and Error-Based Learning of Motor Behaviors , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Sarah E. Criscimagna-Hemminger,et al.  Size of error affects cerebellar contributions to motor learning. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  Flavio T. P. Oliveira,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of posterior parietal cortex affects decisions of hand choice , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  R. Ivry,et al.  Effect of Reinforcement History on Hand Choice in an Unconstrained Reaching Task , 2011, Front. Neurosci..

[25]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Learning from Sensory and Reward Prediction Errors during Motor Adaptation , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[26]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Principles of sensorimotor learning , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[27]  John E. Schlerf,et al.  Dynamic Modulation of Cerebellar Excitability for Abrupt, But Not Gradual, Visuomotor Adaptation , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Raymond J. Delnicki,et al.  Overcoming Motor “Forgetting” Through Reinforcement Of Learned Actions , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Thomas R. Reppert,et al.  Evidence for Hyperbolic Temporal Discounting of Reward in Control of Movements , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  Andrzej Przybyla,et al.  Hemispheric differences in the control of limb dynamics: a link between arm performance asymmetries and arm selection patterns. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Changes in corticospinal excitability during reach adaptation in force fields. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  R. Osu,et al.  Quantifying Arm Nonuse in Individuals Poststroke , 2013, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[33]  Reza Shadmehr and Steven P. Wise The computational neurobiology of reaching and pointing , 2014 .

[34]  Jennie E. S. Choi,et al.  Vigor of Movements and the Cost of Time in Decision Making , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.