Numerical investigation of in-vessel core coolability of PWR through an effective safety injection flow model using MELCOR simulation

Abstract A safety injection (SI) flow model predicting target depressurization was developed in the previous study. The model estimated the sum of the decay heat and oxidation heat using the core exit temperature increase rate and core water level decrease rate during the accident progression. However, in the old model only the heat transfer to the coolant was considered but the heat accumulation in the structures was not included in detail. To resolve this issue, therefore, a new mechanistic model was developed by considering heat sources accumulated in the core heat structures. The accuracy of the new model was validated through the prediction of core total heat using the MELCOR 1.8.6 code. It was confirmed that the new model resulted in a relatively small error less than 10% in almost all sections while the old model exhibited a large error exceeding 50% since the start of oxidation for postulated SBO severe accident scenario. Through the model validation, an improved SI flow map was developed to predict more accurate target depressurization of the reactor coolant system (RCS) needed for maintaining core coolability. This study suggests that new SI flow map can effectively assist operator’s execution related to the RCS depressurization and SI injection into the RCS implemented in the severe accident management guideline under various severe accident scenarios.

[1]  W. Choi,et al.  Development of safety injection flow map associated with target depressurization for effective severe accident management of OPR1000 , 2016 .

[2]  J. Birchley,et al.  Accident management following loss of residual heat removal during mid-loop operation in a Westinghouse two-loop PWR , 2008 .

[3]  Rae-Joon Park,et al.  Evaluation of the RCS depressurization strategy for the high pressure sequences by using SCDAP/RELAP5 , 2008 .

[4]  B. E. Boyack,et al.  MELCOR Peer Review , 1992 .

[5]  Oscar Mazzantini,et al.  Station Black-Out Analysis with MELCOR 1.8.6 Code for Atucha 2Nuclear Power Plant , 2012 .

[6]  Show-Chyuan Chiang,et al.  Analysis of PWR RCS Injection Strategy during Severe Accident , 2004 .

[7]  S. J. Kim,et al.  Validation of RCS depressurization strategy and core coolability map for independent scenarios of SBLOCA, SBO, and TLOFW , 2014 .

[8]  Sung Joong Kim,et al.  Effectiveness and adverse effects of reactor coolant system depressurization strategy with various severe accident management guidance entry conditions for OPR1000 , 2015 .

[9]  Steven J. Zinkle,et al.  Accident tolerant fuels for LWRs: A perspective , 2014 .

[10]  Tuomo Sevón,et al.  A MELCOR model of Fukushima Daiichi Unit 1 accident , 2015 .

[11]  P. von der Hardt,et al.  LWR severe accident simulation: synthesis of the results and interpretation of the first Phebus FP experiment FPT0 , 2003 .

[12]  P. Chatelard,et al.  Assessment of ICARE/CATHARE V1 Severe Accident Code , 2006 .

[13]  G. Schanz,et al.  Advanced treatment of zircaloy cladding high-temperature oxidation in severe accident code calculations: Part I. Experimental database and basic modeling☆ , 2004 .

[14]  Hwan-Yeol Kim,et al.  Detailed evaluation of safety injection tank effects on in-vessel severe accident progression in a small break LOCA without safety injection , 2013 .

[15]  J. Birchley,et al.  Accident management following loss-of-coolant accidents during cooldown in a Westinghouse two-loop PWR , 2010 .

[16]  Jonghyun Kim,et al.  Verification of SAMG entry condition for APR1400 , 2015 .

[17]  Wonjun Choi,et al.  Effectiveness and adverse effects of in-vessel retention strategies under a postulated SGTR accident of an OPR1000 , 2017 .

[18]  Goon-Cherl Park,et al.  Optimum RCS depressurization strategy for effective severe accident management of station black out accident , 2009 .

[19]  Manfred Fischer,et al.  The severe accident mitigation concept and the design measures for core melt retention of the European Pressurized Reactor (EPR) , 2004 .