The perceived angle of the round window affects electrode insertion trauma in round window insertion – an anatomical study

Abstract Conclusion: In this study round window (RW) insertion of cochlear implant was performed with a lower degree of trauma in 86.6% of cases. Therefore RW insertion is a valid option to be considered in selected cochlear implant patients, especially when hearing preservation is a goal. In most cases drilling of the overhangs is required. Objectives: To systematically examine the potential for minimizing electrode insertion trauma with RW insertion. Methods: Fifteen temporal bones were inserted with a 0.5 mm electrode analog in an anterior or antero-inferior vector from a reference point along the facial recess. Surface preparation of the inferior segment of the basal turn was performed and the point of first contact was analyzed using computerized morphometric software. The same software was used to measure the RW dimensions before and after drill down of the bony overhangs. An insertion was considered ‘traumatic’ if the point of first contact was the medial wall of the scala, whereas ‘less traumatic’ was an insertion in which the point of first contact was the inferior or posterior wall of the scala. Results: Less traumatic insertion was achieved in 13 of the 15 bones, and in these the mean RW angle, as observed from a surgical point of view, was 137°. The mean RW angle in the traumatic insertion group was 147°. The difference was statistically significant.

[1]  W. Parkinson,et al.  Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria. , 1999, The American journal of otology.

[2]  A. Eshraghi,et al.  Comparative Study of Cochlear Damage With Three Perimodiolar Electrode Designs , 2003, The Laryngoscope.

[3]  C. G. Wright,et al.  Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion: The Round Window Revisited , 2007, The Laryngoscope.

[4]  G M Clark,et al.  Surgical anatomy of the round window with special reference to cochlear implantation , 1987, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[5]  A. Eshraghi,et al.  D-JNKI-1 Treatment Prevents the Progression of Hearing Loss in a Model of Cochlear Implantation Trauma , 2006, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[6]  Xenia Meshik,et al.  Optimal Cochlear Implant Insertion Vectors , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[7]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Development and Evaluation of an Improved Cochlear Implant Electrode Design for Electric Acoustic Stimulation , 2004, The Laryngoscope.

[8]  A. Eshraghi,et al.  Local Dexamethasone Therapy Conserves Hearing in an Animal Model of Electrode Insertion Trauma-Induced Hearing Loss , 2007, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[9]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Comparison of Round Window and Cochleostomy Approaches with a Prototype Hearing Preservation Electrode , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[10]  Fred F Telischi,et al.  Conservation of Residual Acoustic Hearing After Cochlear Implantation , 2006, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[11]  E. Keithley,et al.  Immunohistochemical Analysis of Proliferating Cells in a Sterile Labyrinthitis Animal Model , 1998, The Laryngoscope.

[12]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Combining perimodiolar electrode placement and atraumatic insertion properties in cochlear implantation – fact or fantasy? , 2006, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[13]  B. Woodson,et al.  Prediction of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty response using cephalometric radiographs. , 1997, American journal of otolaryngology.

[14]  N. Cohen,et al.  Surgical Technique for the Clarion® Cochlear Implant , 1999, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[15]  A. Hodges,et al.  Conservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation. , 1997, The American journal of otology.

[16]  Michael Tykocinski,et al.  Cochleostomy site: Implications for electrode placement and hearing preservation , 2005, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[17]  Helge Rask-Andersen,et al.  Variational Anatomy of the Human Cochlea: Implications for Cochlear Implantation , 2009, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[18]  H. Pillsbury,et al.  Minimizing intracochlear trauma during cochlear implantation. , 2010, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[19]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Cochlear implantation via the round window membrane minimizes trauma to cochlear structures: A histologically controlled insertion study , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica.