Wildlife corridors as a connected subgraph problem

Wildlife corridors connect areas of biological significance to mitigate the negative ecological impacts of habitat fragmentation. In this article we formalize the optimal corridor design as a connected subgraph problem, which maximizes the amount of suitable habitat in a fully connected parcel network linking core habitat areas, subject to a constraint on the funds available for land acquisition. To solve this challenging computational problem, we propose a hybrid approach that combines graph algorithms with Mixed Integer Programming-based optimization. We apply this technique to the design of corridors for grizzly bears in the U.S. Northern Rockies, illustrating the underlying computational complexities by varying the granularity of the parcels available for acquisition. The approach that is introduced is general and can be applied to other species or other similar problems, such as those occurring in social networks.

[1]  S. Safra,et al.  On the hardness of approximating minimum vertex cover , 2005 .

[2]  Les G. Underhill,et al.  Optimal and suboptimal reserve selection algorithms , 1994 .

[3]  Peter Berck,et al.  Habitat and Open Space at Risk of Land‐Use Conversion: Targeting Strategies for Land Conservation , 2006 .

[4]  Bistra N. Dilkina,et al.  Solving Connected Subgraph Problems in Wildlife Conservation , 2010, CPAIOR.

[5]  R. Noss Corridors in Real Landscapes: A Reply to Simberloff and Cox , 1987 .

[6]  Kent D. Messer,et al.  The conservation benefits of cost-effective land acquisition: a case study in Maryland. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[7]  S. Polasky,et al.  Integrating economic costs into conservation planning. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  J. Orestes Cerdeira,et al.  Connectivity in priority area selection for conservation , 2005 .

[9]  Amy McEuen The Wildlife Corridor Controversy : A Review by Amy McEuen , 2006 .

[10]  H. Prömel,et al.  The Steiner Tree Problem: A Tour through Graphs, Algorithms, and Complexity , 2002 .

[11]  Richard L. Church,et al.  Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problem , 1996 .

[12]  Thomas Schmitt,et al.  Influence of habitat fragmentation on the genetic structure of Polyommatus coridon (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): implications for conservation , 2002 .

[13]  David Paetkau,et al.  Effectiveness of a Regional Corridor in Connecting Two Florida Black Bear Populations , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[14]  S. Polasky,et al.  Selecting Biological Reserves Cost-Effectively: An Application to Terrestrial Vertebrate Conservation in Oregon , 2001, Land Economics.

[15]  Nick M. Haddad,et al.  CORRIDOR USE BY DIVERSE TAXA , 2003 .

[16]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Fast discovery of connection subgraphs , 2004, KDD.

[17]  Stephanie A. Snyder,et al.  Restoring habitat corridors in fragmented landscapes using optimization and percolation models , 2005 .

[18]  小林 信治,et al.  自然資源および環境資源への制御理論の適用-解説-上-(Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,4,1977) , 1981 .

[19]  Charles S. ReVelle,et al.  Spatial attributes and reserve design models: A review , 2005 .

[20]  Weixiong Zhang,et al.  A Study of Complexity Transitions on the Asymmetric Traveling Salesman Problem , 1996, Artif. Intell..

[21]  Ellen I. Damschen,et al.  Corridors affect plants, animals, and their interactions in fragmented landscapes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Amy W. Ando,et al.  Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation , 1998, Science.

[23]  Marshall W. Bern,et al.  The Steiner Problem with Edge Lengths 1 and 2 , 1989, Inf. Process. Lett..

[24]  John W. Hearne,et al.  A new method to solve the fully connected Reserve Network Design Problem , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  R. Groeneveld Economic considerations in the optimal size and number of reserve sites , 2005 .

[26]  S. Polasky,et al.  Dynamic reserve site selection , 2004 .

[27]  Robert G. Haight,et al.  Reserve selection with minimum contiguous area restrictions: An application to open space protection planning in suburban Chicago , 2009 .

[28]  Manuela M. P. Huso,et al.  A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon , 1997 .

[29]  Hayri Önal,et al.  Optimal Selection of a Connected Reserve Network , 2006, Oper. Res..

[30]  John Sessions,et al.  Solving for Habitat Connections as a Steiner Network Problem , 1992 .

[31]  Andrew R. Solow,et al.  A note on optimal algorithms for reserve site selection , 1996 .

[32]  R. Ims,et al.  Optimal width of movement corridors for root voles : not too marrow and not too wide , 1996 .

[33]  Paul J. Ferraro,et al.  Conservation Contracting in Heterogeneous Landscapes: An Application to Watershed Protection with Threshold Constraints , 2003, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[34]  Justin C. Williams A Zero-One Programming Model for Contiguous Land Acquisition , 2002 .

[35]  Mariana Munguía,et al.  Incorporating connectivity into conservation planning: A multi-criteria case study from central Mexico , 2006 .

[36]  A. O. Nicholls,et al.  Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity , 1988 .

[37]  Justin C. Williams,et al.  Delineating protected wildlife corridors with multi‐objective programming , 1998 .