Application of two design methods for active flutter suppression and wind-tunnel test results

SUMMARY The synthesis, implementation, and wind-tunnel test of two flutter- suppression control laws for an aeroelastic model equipped with a trailing- edge control surface are presented. One control law is based on the aerody- namic energy method, and the other is based on results of optimal control theory. Analytical methods used to design the control laws and evaluate their performance are described. The test objective was to demonstrate an increase in flutter dynamic pressure of at least 44 percent over a range of Mach numbers by using active flutter suppression. At Mach 0.6, 0.8, and 0.9, increases in flutter dynamic pressure were obtained but the full 44-percent increase was not achieved. However at Mach 0.95, the 44-percent increase was achieved with both control laws. Experimental results indicate that the performance of the sys- tems is not so effective as that predicted by analysis. Also, the results indicate that wind-tunnel turbulence plays an important role in both control- law synthesis and demonstration of system performance.

[1]  E. Nissim,et al.  Recent advances in aerodynamic energy concept for flutter suppression and gust alleviation using active controls , 1977 .

[2]  C. V. Eckstrom,et al.  Drones for aerodynamic and structural testing /DAST/ - A status report , 1978 .

[3]  R P Peloubet,et al.  Application of Three Aeroservoelastic Stability Analysis Techniques , 1976 .

[4]  Roger Fletcher,et al.  A Rapidly Convergent Descent Method for Minimization , 1963, Comput. J..

[5]  Huibert Kwakernaak,et al.  Linear Optimal Control Systems , 1972 .

[6]  E. Nissim,et al.  Flutter suppression using active controls based on the concept of aerodynamic energy , 1971 .

[7]  J. R. Newson A method for obtaining practical flutter-suppression control laws using results of optimal control theory , 1979 .

[8]  Boyd Perry,et al.  Two Synthesis Techniques Applied to Flutter Suppression on a Flight Research Wing , 1978 .

[9]  E. Nissim,et al.  Development and application of an optimization procedure for flutter suppression using the aerodynamic energy concept , 1978 .

[10]  R. V. Hood,et al.  Active controls - Changing the rules of structural design. , 1972 .

[11]  Francis D Sevart,et al.  Development of Active Flutter Suppression Wind Tunnel Testing Technology , 1975 .

[12]  J. C. Townsend,et al.  Flutter Suppression by Active Control and its Benefits , 1976 .

[13]  I. Abel,et al.  An analytical technique for predicting the characteristics of a flexible wing equipped with an active flutter-suppression system and comparison with wind-tunnel data , 1979 .

[14]  A. Hausner Analog and analog/hybrid computer programming , 1971 .

[15]  Kenneth L. Roger,et al.  Active Flutter Suppression—A Flight Test Demonstration , 1975 .