3D cell bioprinting of self-assembling peptide-based hydrogels

Bioprinting of 3D cell-laden constructs with well-defined architectures and controlled spatial distribution of cells is gaining importance in the field of Tissue Engineering. New 3D tissue models are being developed to study the complex cellular interactions that take place during both tissue development and in the regeneration of damaged and/or diseased tissues. Despite advances in 3D printing technologies, suitable hydrogels or ‘bioinks’ with enhanced printability and cell viability are lacking. Here we report a study on the 3D bioprinting of a novel group of self-assembling peptide-based hydrogels. Our results demonstrate the ability of the system to print well-defined 3D cell laden constructs with variable stiffness and improved structural integrity, whilst providing a cell-friendly extracellular matrix “like” microenvironment. Biological assays reveal that mammary epithelial cells remain viable after 7 days of in vitro culture, independent of the hydrogel stiffness.

[1]  Tal Dvir,et al.  Nanotechnological strategies for engineering complex tissues. , 2020, Nature nanotechnology.

[2]  Yuki Hori,et al.  Dual‐Stage Crosslinking of a Gel‐Phase Bioink Improves Cell Viability and Homogeneity for 3D Bioprinting , 2016, Advanced healthcare materials.

[3]  Aldo R Boccaccini,et al.  Evaluation of an alginate–gelatine crosslinked hydrogel for bioplotting , 2015, Biofabrication.

[4]  Dong-Woo Cho,et al.  Biofabrication: reappraising the definition of an evolving field , 2016, Biofabrication.

[5]  Molly M Stevens,et al.  Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface. , 2011, Science.

[6]  Vasif Hasirci,et al.  Advanced cell therapies with and without scaffolds , 2011, Biotechnology journal.

[7]  Megan S. Lord,et al.  Influence of nanoscale surface topography on protein adsorption and cellular response , 2010 .

[8]  Julian H. George,et al.  Exploring and Engineering the Cell Surface Interface , 2005, Science.

[9]  A. Miller,et al.  Self-assembled octapeptide scaffolds for in vitro chondrocyte culture. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[10]  Anthony Atala,et al.  Evaluation of hydrogels for bio-printing applications. , 2013, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[11]  Franz J. Giessibl,et al.  Forces and frequency shifts in atomic-resolution dynamic-force microscopy , 1997 .

[12]  P. Bártolo,et al.  Additive manufacturing of tissues and organs , 2012 .

[13]  R. Samanipour,et al.  A simple and high-resolution stereolithography-based 3D bioprinting system using visible light crosslinkable bioinks , 2015, Biofabrication.

[14]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[15]  Cameron P. Brown,et al.  Advancing musculoskeletal research with nanoscience , 2013, Nature Reviews Rheumatology.

[16]  T. Scheibel,et al.  Biofabrication of cell-loaded 3D spider silk constructs. , 2015, Angewandte Chemie.

[17]  D. Cho,et al.  3D printing of cell-laden constructs for heterogeneous tissue regeneration , 2013 .

[18]  Rui L Reis,et al.  Towards the design of 3D multiscale instructive tissue engineering constructs: Current approaches and trends. , 2015, Biotechnology advances.

[19]  Peter Dubruel,et al.  A review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for tissue engineering. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[20]  T. Scheibel,et al.  Strategies and Molecular Design Criteria for 3D Printable Hydrogels. , 2016, Chemical reviews.

[21]  P. Bártolo,et al.  Cellularized versus decellularized scaffolds for bone regeneration , 2016 .

[22]  Jos Malda,et al.  A Printable Photopolymerizable Thermosensitive p(HPMAm‐lactate)‐PEG Hydrogel for Tissue Engineering , 2011 .

[23]  Wei Sun,et al.  Effect of bioink properties on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting of embryonic stem cells , 2016, Biofabrication.

[24]  J Malda,et al.  Hydrogel-based reinforcement of 3D bioprinted constructs , 2016, Biofabrication.

[25]  P. Dubruel,et al.  The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-engineered constructs with high cell viability. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[26]  C. Streuli.  Integrins as architects of cell behavior , 2016, Molecular biology of the cell.

[27]  R. Proksch,et al.  Loss tangent imaging: Theory and simulations of repulsive-mode tapping atomic force microscopy , 2012 .

[28]  S. Hollister.  Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering , 2005, Nature materials.

[29]  P. Gatenholm,et al.  3D Bioprinting Human Chondrocytes with Nanocellulose-Alginate Bioink for Cartilage Tissue Engineering Applications. , 2015, Biomacromolecules.

[30]  Adam J. Engler,et al.  Matrix elasticity directs stem cell differentiation , 2006 .

[31]  G. Whitesides.  The 'right' size in nanobiotechnology , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[32]  A. Miller,et al.  Human osteoblasts within soft peptide hydrogels promote mineralisation in vitro , 2014, Journal of tissue engineering.

[33]  S. Richardson,et al.  Self-assembling peptide hydrogel for intervertebral disc tissue engineering. , 2015, Acta biomaterialia.

[34]  Kwok Yeung Tsang,et al.  The developmental roles of the extracellular matrix: beyond structure to regulation , 2009, Cell and Tissue Research.

[35]  A. Gaharwar,et al.  Advanced Bioinks for 3D Printing: A Materials Science Perspective , 2016, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  Justin Cooper-White,et al.  The influence of substrate creep on mesenchymal stem cell behaviour and phenotype. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[37]  Bin Duan,et al.  Optimizing Photo-Encapsulation Viability of Heart Valve Cell Types in 3D Printable Composite Hydrogels , 2016, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.