Evolution of product lifespan and implications for environmental assessment and management: a case study of personal computers in higher education.

Product lifespan is a fundamental variable in understanding the environmental impacts associated with the life cycle of products. Existing life cycle and materials flow studies of products, almost without exception, consider lifespan to be constant over time. To determine the validity of this assumption, this study provides an empirical documentation of the long-term evolution of personal computer lifespan, using a major U.S. university as a case study. Results indicate that over the period 1985-2000, computer lifespan (purchase to "disposal") decreased steadily from a mean of 10.7 years in 1985 to 5.5 years in 2000. The distribution of lifespan also evolved, becoming narrower over time. Overall, however, lifespan distribution was broader than normally considered in life cycle assessments or materials flow forecasts of electronic waste management for policy. We argue that these results suggest that at least for computers, the assumption of constant lifespan is problematic and that it is important to work toward understanding the dynamics of use patterns. We modify an age-structured model of population dynamics from biology as a modeling approach to describe product life cycles. Lastly, the purchase share and generation of obsolete computers from the higher education sector is estimated using different scenarios for the dynamics of product lifespan.

[1]  Yan Yang,et al.  Logistic model-based forecast of sales and generation of obsolete computers in the U.S. , 2009 .

[2]  Edward Kavazanjian,et al.  Environmental, social, and economic implications of global reuse and recycling of personal computers. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  John J. Reap,et al.  A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment , 2008 .

[4]  S. Levine,et al.  A Dynamic Model for Determining the Temporal Distribution of Environmental Burden , 2007 .

[5]  Natali Hritonenko,et al.  Network economics and optimal replacement of age-structured IT capital , 2007, Math. Methods Oper. Res..

[6]  Hai-Yong Kang,et al.  Estimation of future outflows and infrastructure needed to recycle personal computer systems in California. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[7]  Hang-Sik Shin,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of a Personal Computer and its Effective Recycling Rate (7 pp) , 2006 .

[8]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  A New LCA Methodology of Technology Evolution (TE-LCA) and its Application to the Production of Ammonia (1950-2000) (8 pp) , 2006 .

[9]  J. Day,et al.  Computer and Internet Use in the United States: 2003 , 2005 .

[10]  Brynhildur Davidsdottir,et al.  Pulp Nonfiction: Regionalized Dynamic Model of the U.S. Pulp and Paper Industry , 2005 .

[11]  E. Williams,et al.  Residential computer usage patterns in Japan and associated life cycle energy use , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, 2005..

[12]  Eric Williams,et al.  Energy intensity of computer manufacturing: hybrid assessment combining process and economic input-output methods. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  Response to Comment on “The 1.7 Kilogram Microchip: Energy and Material Use in the Production of Semiconductor Devices” , 2004 .

[14]  Tomohiro Tasaki,et al.  Substance flow analysis of brominated flame retardants and related compounds in waste TV sets in Japan. , 2004, Waste management.

[15]  M. Warschauer Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide , 2003 .

[16]  E. Williams,et al.  The 1.7 kilogram microchip: energy and material use in the production of semiconductor devices. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Randolph Kirchain,et al.  Life‐Cycle Assessment and Temporal Distributions of Emissions: Developing a Fleet‐Based Analysis , 2000 .

[18]  Varadarajan V. Chari,et al.  Vintage Human Capital, Growth, and the Diffusion of New Technology , 1991, Journal of Political Economy.