Boards and CSR: an emerging market perspective

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to understand the influence of family ownership and governance mechanisms on corporate social responsibility (CSR) scores through the lens of the principal–principal (PP) perspective.Design/methodology/approachUsing a random-effects model the authors sample 21 hundred board members across a 101 listed Mexican companies from 2008 to 2020.FindingsThe paper finds that board independence and board committees are positively related to CSR scores.Practical implicationsResults of this paper suggest that stronger governance can enhance CSR: board independence and committees can be a counterbalancing mechanism serving stakeholders aiming to improve CSR scores.Originality/valueMost CSR research has focused on determinants and outcomes of CSR. The authors analyze an unexplored aspect of the corporate governance (CG) and CSR relationship: the potential influence of family ownership and governance mechanisms on CSR.

[1]  Alfredo De Massis,et al.  Sustainability practices of family and nonfamily firms: A worldwide study , 2022, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[2]  Jennifer Martínez‐Ferrero,et al.  The impact of board cultural diversity on a firm's commitment toward the sustainability issues of emerging countries: The mediating effect of a CSR committee , 2020 .

[3]  Herman Aguinis,et al.  Understanding employee responses to COVID-19: a behavioral corporate social responsibility perspective , 2020 .

[4]  Markus Dick,et al.  Founder-Controlled Family Firms, Overconfidence, and Corporate Social Responsibility Engagement: Evidence From Survey Data , 2020 .

[5]  Martín Larraza-Kintana,et al.  When Do Women Make a Better Table? Examining the Influence of Women Directors on Family Firm’s Corporate Social Performance , 2018, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.

[6]  J. Paniagua,et al.  Corporate governance and financial performance: The role of ownership and board structure , 2018, Journal of Business Research.

[7]  S. Falco,et al.  Diversity of Board of Directors and Environmental Social Governance: Evidence from Italian Listed Companies , 2018 .

[8]  Zhichuan Frank Li A survey of corporate social responsibility and corporate governance , 2018 .

[9]  Pankaj C. Patel,et al.  In the Horns of the Dilemma: Socioemotional Wealth, Financial Wealth, and Acquisitions in Family Firms , 2018 .

[10]  B. Husted,et al.  Board structure and environmental, social, and governance disclosure in Latin America , 2018, Journal of Business Research.

[11]  I. García‐Sánchez,et al.  Board Structure to Enhance Social Responsibility Development: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of US Companies , 2017 .

[12]  W. Schulze,et al.  Are Family Firms Good Employers , 2017 .

[13]  Lázaro Rodríguez‐Ariza,et al.  The Role of Female Directors in Promoting CSR Practices: An International Comparison between Family and Non‐Family Businesses , 2017 .

[14]  Ruth V. Aguilera,et al.  Varieties of institutional systems: A contextual taxonomy of understudied countries , 2016 .

[15]  Maximiliano González,et al.  The Effect of Ownership Concentration and Composition on Dividends: Evidence from Latin America , 2016 .

[16]  Ziliang Deng,et al.  Assessing endogeneity issues in international marketing research , 2016 .

[17]  R. Amit,et al.  Governance of Family Firms , 2015 .

[18]  Bill Rees,et al.  The Influence of Family Ownership on Corporate Social Responsibility: An International Analysis of Publicly Listed Companies , 2015 .

[19]  Martín Larraza-Kintana,et al.  Are Family Firms Really More Socially Responsible? , 2014 .

[20]  Yi Tang,et al.  How CEO Hubris Affects Corporate Social (Ir)responsibility , 2014 .

[21]  Thomas Schmid,et al.  The Effect of Family Governance on Corporate Time Horizons , 2013 .

[22]  C. Ntim,et al.  Corporate Governance and Performance in Socially Responsible Corporations: New Empirical Insights from a Neo‐Institutional Framework , 2013 .

[23]  W. Rees,et al.  What type of controlling investors impact on which elements of corporate social responsibility? , 2013 .

[24]  Xiaohua Yu,et al.  Corporate social responsibility and the pollution haven hypothesis: evidence from multinationals’ investment decision in China , 2013 .

[25]  Antonio Parbonetti,et al.  The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure , 2010, Journal of Management & Governance.

[26]  Jorge A. Duran-Encalada,et al.  The relationship among family business, corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from the Mexican stock exchange , 2012 .

[27]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  Principal-principal conflicts during crisis , 2011 .

[28]  M. Crossan,et al.  Dominant CEO, Deviant Strategy, and Extreme Performance: The Moderating Role of a Powerful Board , 2011 .

[29]  H. Jo,et al.  Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2011 .

[30]  L. Gómez-Mejia,et al.  Socioemotional Wealth and Corporate Responses to Institutional Pressures: Do Family-Controlled Firms Pollute Less? , 2010 .

[31]  Hsiang-Lan Chen,et al.  Family Ownership, Board Independence, and R&D Investment , 2009 .

[32]  Christoph Lattemann,et al.  CSR Communication Intensity in Chinese and Indian Multinational Companies , 2009 .

[33]  G. Tyge Payne,et al.  Corporate Board Attributes, Team Effectiveness and Financial Performance , 2009 .

[34]  D. Hillier,et al.  Firm Performance and Managerial Succession in Family Managed Firms , 2009 .

[35]  Christian Andres,et al.  Large shareholders and firm performance--An empirical examination of founding-family ownership , 2008 .

[36]  Nicolas S. Majluf,et al.  Does family ownership shape performance outcomes , 2008 .

[37]  Alistair Brown,et al.  Corporate social reporting and board representation: evidence from the Kenyan banking sector , 2008 .

[38]  J. Block Family Management, Family Ownership, and Downsizing: Evidence from S&P 500 Firms , 2008 .

[39]  Yi Jiang,et al.  Corporate Governance in Emerging Economies: A Review of the Principal-Principal Perspective , 2008 .

[40]  F. Lefort,et al.  Board Independence, Firm Performance and Ownership Concentration: Evidence from Chile , 2007 .

[41]  David A. Whetten,et al.  Family Firms and Social Responsibility: Preliminary Evidence from the S&P 500 , 2006 .

[42]  Ruth V. Aguilera,et al.  Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility: A Comparative Analysis of the UK and the Us , 2006 .

[43]  J. Piesse,et al.  The role of corporate governance in FDI decisions: Evidence from Taiwan , 2005 .

[44]  Ronald C. Anderson,et al.  Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500 , 2003 .

[45]  Stijn Claessens,et al.  Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings , 2002 .

[46]  M. Arellano Panel Data Econometrics , 2002 .

[47]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Inverse probability weighted M-estimators for sample selection, attrition, and stratification , 2002 .

[48]  Matthew S. Kraatz,et al.  How Organizational Resources Affect Strategic Change and Performance in Turbulent Environments , 2001 .

[49]  Larry H. P. Lang,et al.  The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations , 1999 .

[50]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision making groups , 1999 .

[51]  James D. Westphal Board Games: How CEOs Adapt to Increases in Structural Board Independence from Management , 1998 .

[52]  April Klein,et al.  Firm Performance and Board Committee Structure1 , 1998, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[53]  Samuel B. Graves,et al.  The corporate social performance-financial performance link , 1997 .

[54]  M. Whyte The Chinese Family and Economic Development: Obstacle or Engine? , 1996, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[55]  Badi H. Baltagi,et al.  Testing AR(1) against MA(1) disturbances in an error component model , 1995 .

[56]  G. Monette,et al.  Generalized Collinearity Diagnostics , 1992 .

[57]  J. Hausman Specification tests in econometrics , 1978 .

[58]  F. J. Forcadell,et al.  European Banks' Reputation for Corporate Social Responsibility , 2017 .

[59]  Isabel María García Sánchez The effectiveness of corporate governance: board structure and business technical efficiency in Spain , 2010, Central Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[60]  Susan M. Machuga,et al.  Board of director characteristics and earnings quality surrounding implementation of a corporate governance code in Mexico , 2009 .

[61]  Adrian Pagan,et al.  The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics , 1980 .