Trusting Social Media as a Source of Health Information: Online Surveys Comparing the United States, Korea, and Hong Kong

Background The Internet has increasingly become a popular source of health information by connecting individuals with health content, experts, and support. More and more, individuals turn to social media and Internet sites to share health information and experiences. Although online health information seeking occurs worldwide, limited empirical studies exist examining cross-cultural differences in perceptions about user-generated, experience-based information compared to expertise-based information sources. Objective To investigate if cultural variations exist in patterns of online health information seeking, specifically in perceptions of online health information sources. It was hypothesized that Koreans and Hongkongers, compared to Americans, would be more likely to trust and use experience-based knowledge shared in social Internet sites, such as social media and online support groups. Conversely, Americans, compared to Koreans and Hongkongers, would value expertise-based knowledge prepared and approved by doctors or professional health providers more. Methods Survey questionnaires were developed in English first and then translated into Korean and Chinese. The back-translation method ensured the standardization of questions. Surveys were administered using a standardized recruitment strategy and data collection methods. Results A total of 826 participants living in metropolitan areas from the United States (n=301), Korea (n=179), and Hong Kong (n=337) participated in the study. We found significant cultural differences in information processing preferences for online health information. A planned contrast test revealed that Koreans and Hongkongers showed more trust in experience-based health information sources (blogs: t 451.50=11.21, P<.001; online support group: t 455.71=9.30, P<.001; social networking sites [SNS]: t 466.75=11.36, P<.001) and also reported using blogs (t 515.31=6.67, P<.001) and SNS (t 529.22=4.51, P<.001) more frequently than Americans. Americans showed a stronger preference for using expertise-based information sources (eg, WebMD and CDC) compared to Koreans and Hongkongers (t 360.02=3.01, P=.003). Trust in expertise-based information sources was universal, demonstrating no cultural differences (Brown-Forsythe F 2,654=1.82, P=.16). Culture also contributed significantly to differences in searching information on behalf of family members (t 480.38=5.99, P<.001) as well as to the goals of information searching. Conclusions This research found significant cultural differences in information processing preferences for online health information. Further discussion is included regarding effective communication strategies in providing quality health information.

[1]  Yong-Mi Kim,et al.  Is seeking health information online different from seeking general information online? , 2015, J. Inf. Sci..

[2]  Kenneth Lee,et al.  Dr Google and the Consumer: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Navigational Needs and Online Health Information-Seeking Behaviors of Consumers With Chronic Health Conditions , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[3]  Gary L. Kreps,et al.  The Influences of Immigration on Health Information Seeking Behaviors Among Korean Americans and Native Koreans , 2014, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[4]  Patric R. Spence,et al.  Exploring the impact of ethnic identity through other-generated cues on perceptions of spokesperson credibility , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[5]  Patric R. Spence,et al.  Intercultural differences in responses to health messages on social media from spokespeople with varying levels of ethnic identity , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Sonja Utz,et al.  Consumers rule: How consumer reviews influence perceived trustworthiness of online stores , 2012, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[7]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Using Web 2.0 Technologies to Enhance Evidence-Based Medical Information , 2011, Journal of health communication.

[8]  Sang-Yeon Kim,et al.  Holism: A Missing Link in Individualism-Collectivism Research , 2011 .

[9]  K. Dindia,et al.  Reframing the Cultural Differences between the East and the West , 2010 .

[10]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Social and Heuristic Approaches to Credibility Evaluation Online , 2010 .

[11]  Peter J. Schulz,et al.  Online Health Information Seeking in the Context of the Medical Consultation in Switzerland , 2010, Qualitative health research.

[12]  Mike Thelwall Emotion Homophily in Social Network Site Messages , 2010, First Monday.

[13]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  Effects of Online Health Sources on Credibility and Behavioral Intentions , 2010, Commun. Res..

[14]  Kai H. Lim,et al.  Web strategies to promote internet shopping: is cultural-customization needed? , 2009 .

[15]  E. Buchtel,et al.  Which should you use, intuition or logic? Cultural differences in injunctive norms about reasoning , 2008 .

[16]  J. Walther,et al.  Health Information, Credibility, Homophily, and Influence via the Internet: Web Sites Versus Discussion Groups , 2008, Health communication.

[17]  Munyi Shea,et al.  Asian American Students' Cultural Values, Stigma, and Relational Self-construal: Correlates of Attitudes Toward Professional Help Seeking , 2008 .

[18]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Do I Trust You Online, and If So, Will I Buy? An Empirical Study of Two Trust-Building Strategies , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[19]  M. McMullan Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship. , 2006, Patient education and counseling.

[20]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Patient information needs: pre- and post-consultation , 2006, Health Informatics J..

[21]  Jen-Hung Huang,et al.  Herding in online product choice , 2006 .

[22]  Traci Hong,et al.  Contributing Factors to the Use of Health-Related Websites , 2006, Journal of health communication.

[23]  K. Goh,et al.  Transparency and trust: risk communications and the Singapore experience in managing SARS , 2005, Journal of Communication Management.

[24]  Rajiv N. Rimal,et al.  Using computers to narrowcast health messages: The role of audience segmentation, targeting, and tailoring in health promotion. , 2003 .

[25]  R. Nisbett The Geography of Thought , 2003 .

[26]  Christian Köhler,et al.  What is the prevalence of health-related searches on the World Wide Web? Qualitative and quantitative analysis of search engine queries on the Internet , 2003, AMIA.

[27]  Beom Jun Kim,et al.  Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[28]  Matthew S. Eastin,et al.  Credibility Assessments of Online Health Information: The Effects of Source Expertise and Knowledge of Content , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[29]  L. Siu,et al.  Impact of the media and the internet on oncology: survey of cancer patients and oncologists in Canada. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. , 2001, Psychological review.

[31]  J. Saul,et al.  Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres , 2001, British Journal of Cancer.

[32]  A. Fuligni,et al.  Attitudes toward Family Obligations among American Adolescents with Asian, Latin American, and European Backgrounds , 1999 .

[33]  A. Dupré Communicating about health : current issues and perspectives , 1999 .

[34]  Frederick T. L. Leong,et al.  Individualism-Collectivism, Social-Network Orientation, and Acculturation as Predictors of Attitudes Toward Seeking Professional Psychological Help Among Chinese Americans , 1994 .

[35]  A. Derdiarian Informational needs of recently diagnosed cancer patients. , 1986, Nursing research.

[36]  David Tuckett,et al.  Meetings Between Experts: An Approach to Sharing Ideas in Medical Consultations , 1986 .