“We must conclude that…”:A diachronic study of academic engagement

[1]  F. Jiang,et al.  Change of Attitude? A Diachronic Study of Stance , 2016 .

[2]  Guangwei Hu,et al.  Disciplinary and paradigmatic influences on interactional metadiscourse in research articles , 2015 .

[3]  Enrique Lafuente-Millán Reader engagement across cultures, languages and contexts of publication in business research articles , 2014 .

[4]  Jason Miin-Hwa Lim,et al.  How do writers establish research niches? A genre-based investigation into management researchers' rhetorical steps and linguistic mechanisms , 2012 .

[5]  Lisa McGrath,et al.  Stance and engagement in pure mathematics research articles: Linking discourse features to disciplinary practices , 2012 .

[6]  Mary J. Schleppegrell,et al.  Taking an effective authorial stance in academic writing: Making the linguistic resources explicit for L2 writers in the social sciences , 2011 .

[7]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science , 2010 .

[8]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Corpus informed discourse analysis: the case of academic engagement , 2009 .

[9]  P. White Praising and blaming, applauding and disparaging - solidarity, audience positioning and the linguistic of evaluation disposition , 2008 .

[10]  Annelie Ädel,et al.  Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English , 2006 .

[11]  Douglas Biber,et al.  University Language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers , 2006 .

[12]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse , 2005 .

[13]  Jeannett Martin,et al.  The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English , 2005 .

[14]  K. Hyland,et al.  Patterns of engagement: dialogic features and L2 student writing , 2004 .

[15]  Dimitra Koutsantoni,et al.  Attitude, certainty and allusions to common knowledge in scientific research articles , 2004 .

[16]  K. Hyland,et al.  Directives: argument and engagement in academic writing. , 2002 .

[17]  Ken Hyland,et al.  What do they mean? Questions in academic writing , 2002 .

[18]  KEN HYLAND,et al.  Bringing in the Reader , 2001 .

[19]  G. Thompson Interaction in Academic Writing: Learning To Argue with the Reader. , 2001 .

[20]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and cognition, 2nd ed. , 1995 .

[21]  Pauline Webber The function of questions in different medical journal genres , 1994 .

[22]  Tony Becher,et al.  Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines , 1991 .

[23]  Greg Myers,et al.  The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles , 1989 .

[24]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[25]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1989 .

[26]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[27]  Ralf D. Brown,et al.  THE PRONOUNS OF POWER AND SOLIDARITY , 1968 .