On the Use of Spectra to Establish Damage Control in Regular Frames during Global Predesign

A reliable seismic design requires the formulation of explicit design requirements for structural and nonstructural damage control. Recently, several methods for structural damage control have been established. While the majority of them take into consideration the maximum deformation demand, a few of them account for the effect of cumulative plastic deformation demands. From the comparison of the spectral values of displacement and plastic energy evaluated at the fundamental period of vibration and their corresponding demands in regular frames, it can be concluded that reliable estimates of these demands can be obtained for regular frames through the use of response spectra. Furthermore, within the context of performance-based design that accounts for low cycle fatigue, response spectra can be used for the conception of regular frames and, through the use of the static method of analysis, for their global predesign. Any reduction in lateral strength (base shear) that may be obtained from the use of dynamic methods of analysis should be carefully assessed.

[1]  S. B. Hodder Computer processing of New Zealand strong-motion accelerograms , 1983 .

[2]  H. Krawinkler,et al.  Estimation of seismic drift demands for frame structures , 2000 .

[3]  James T. P. Yao,et al.  Damage Assessment Using Response Measurements , 1987 .

[4]  M. Fardis,et al.  Deformations of Reinforced Concrete Members at Yielding and Ultimate , 2001 .

[5]  Mehdi Saiidi,et al.  Earthquake response of irregular R/C structures in the nonlinear range , 1983 .

[6]  W. J. Hall,et al.  Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes , 1999 .

[7]  etc,et al.  Reglamento de construcciones para el Distrito Federal , 1988 .

[8]  A. Ang,et al.  Seismic Damage Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Buildings , 1985 .

[9]  C. Uang,et al.  Evaluation of seismic energy in structures , 1990 .

[10]  H. Tajimi,et al.  Statistical Method of Determining the Maximum Response of Building Structure During an Earthquake , 1960 .

[11]  Johnny Sun,et al.  Development of Ground Motion Time Histories for Phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC Steel Project , 1997 .

[12]  J. P. Moehle,et al.  Displacement-Based Design of RC Structures Subjected to Earthquakes , 1992 .

[13]  H. Krawinkler,et al.  Seismic design based on ductility and cumulative damage demands and capacities , 1992 .

[14]  Eduardo Miranda,et al.  Approximate Lateral Drift Demands in Multistory Buildings with Nonuniform Stiffness , 2002 .

[15]  A. G. Brady,et al.  A STUDY ON THE DURATION OF STRONG EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION , 1975 .

[16]  Amador Teran-Gilmore,et al.  STRENGTH REDUCTION FACTORS FOR DUCTILE STRUCTURES WITH PASSIVE ENERGY DISSIPATING DEVICES , 2003 .

[17]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Modification of Empirical Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Relations to Include the Amplitude and Duration Effects of Rupture Directivity , 1997 .

[18]  A. Ang,et al.  Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete , 1985 .

[19]  S. Pantazopoulou,et al.  SLAB PARTICIPATION IN PRACTICAL EARTHQUAKE DESIGN OF REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAMES , 2001 .

[20]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering , 1995 .

[21]  W. K. Tso,et al.  Seismic energy demands on reinforced concrete moment‐resisting frames , 1993 .

[22]  T. Igusa,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering by Anil K. Chopra , 1996 .

[23]  L. G. Jaeger,et al.  Dynamics of structures , 1990 .

[24]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  Equivalent ductility factors, taking into account low‐cycle fatigue , 1992 .

[25]  Michael N. Fardis,et al.  Estimation of inelastic deformation demands in multistorey RC frame buildings , 1999 .

[26]  Amador Teran-Gilmore,et al.  A Parametric Approach to Performance-Based Numerical Seismic Design , 1998 .