Three‐dimensional visualization and quantification of soil macroporosity and water flow patterns using computed tomography

Abstract. Efforts to assess the role of soil structure in soil and water processes have been limited by data based on two dimensional geometry or disturbed samples. Computed tomography (CT) is a non‐invasive technique that allows for the three dimensional, non‐destructive examination of heterogeneous materials. X‐ray CT scanning was used to acquire serial images of contrasting soil types that could be used to render, and hence, quantify important soil constituents in three dimensions. By repeating the scanning techniques after an infiltration period, it was also possible to examine the nature of water movement in real time. Macropore architecture between different soil types was highly variable and generally appeared as unconnected pore segments at the resolution examined. As expected, water flow characteristics were similar to macropore structure, with wetting patterns resembling both Darcian and preferential flow identified in different soils. From this, it was found that in the sandy clay soil c. 90% of macropore space was active following infiltration, compared with c. 50% for the sandy loam soil. In addition, it was possible to visualize the three dimensional distribution of stones and other mineral material. The results illustrated the benefits of computed tomography over more conventional analyses of soil structure, and its potential as a tool for examining dynamic soil processes. However, problems associated with accessibility, resolution and artefacts still provide limitations of the technique.

[1]  J. Crawford,et al.  New methods and models for characterising structural heterogeneity of soil , 2001 .

[2]  I. Simpson,et al.  Testing High-resolution X-ray Computed Tomography for the Micromorphological Analyses of Archaeological Soils and Sediments , 2001 .

[3]  K. Goulding,et al.  Nitrate leaching from the Broadbalk Wheat Experiment, Rothamsted, UK, as influenced by fertilizer and manure inputs and the weather , 2000 .

[4]  D. Scholefield,et al.  Investigating preferential flow in a large intact soil block under pasture , 2000 .

[5]  A. C. Armstrong,et al.  CRACK‐NP, development of a model for predicting pollutant transport in cracking clay soils , 2000 .

[6]  J. Hopmans,et al.  Pore‐scale measurements of solute breakthrough using microfocus X‐ray computed tomography , 2000 .

[7]  Hannes Flühler,et al.  Quantifying dye tracers in soil profiles by image processing , 2000 .

[8]  S. Jarvis Progress in studies of nitrate leaching from grassland soils , 2000 .

[9]  C. Ritsema,et al.  Wetting patterns and moisture variability in water repellent Dutch soils. , 2000 .

[10]  A. C. Armstrong,et al.  Measurement of solute fluxes in macroporous soils: techniques, problems and precision , 1999 .

[11]  S. O. Prasher,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Quantification of Macropore Networks in Undisturbed Soil Cores , 1999 .

[12]  Ole Wendroth,et al.  Discrimination of Soil Phases by Dual Energy X‐ray Tomography , 1999 .

[13]  D. Scholefield,et al.  Quantification of pore size distribution and the movement of solutes through isolated soil blocks , 1999 .

[14]  Hans-Jörg Vogel,et al.  Morphological determination of pore connectivity as a function of pore size using serial sections , 1997 .

[15]  A. Ringrose-Voase Measurement of soil macropore geometry by image analysis of sections through impregnated soil , 1996, Plant and Soil.

[16]  C. Ritsema,et al.  Three-dimensional visualization of preferential flow patterns in two soils , 1996 .

[17]  H.W.G. Booltink,et al.  Measurement and simulation of bypass flow in a structured clay soil: a physico-morphological approach. , 1993 .

[18]  R. L. Peyton,et al.  Influence of aggregate size on solute transport as measured using computed tomography , 1992 .

[19]  Jan W. Hopmans,et al.  X-ray Tomography of Soil Water Distribution in One-Step Outflow Experiments , 1992 .

[20]  E. Jong,et al.  THE CHARACTERIZATION OF SOIL MACROPOROSITY WITH CT SCANNING , 1989 .

[21]  R. Cesareo,et al.  USING A COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY MINISCANNER IN SOIL SCIENCE , 1986 .

[22]  R. Pozzi-mucelli,et al.  STATIC AND DYNAMIC THREE‐DIMENSIONAL STUDIES OF WATER IN SOIL USING COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC SCANNING1 , 1985 .

[23]  L. Aylmore,et al.  The use of computer-assisted tomography to determine spatial distribution of soil water content , 1983 .

[24]  P. E. Rieke,et al.  Soil Bulk Density Analysis in Three Dimensions by Computed Tomographic Scanning , 1982 .

[25]  J. Bouma,et al.  Estimation of the moisture supply capacity of some swelling clay soils in The Netherlands , 1981 .

[26]  S. Mooney,et al.  Morphological observations of dye tracer infiltration and by-pass flow in milled peat , 2004, Plant and Soil.

[27]  M. Rieu,et al.  New computer tools to quantify 3D porous structures in relation with hydraulic properties , 1999 .

[28]  E. W. Tollner,et al.  SOIL AGGREGATE SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS USING X-RAY IMAGES , 1998 .

[29]  Marnik Vanclooster,et al.  Monitoring Solute Transport in a Multi-Layered Sandy Lysimeter using Time Domain Reflectometry , 1995 .

[30]  J. Bouma,et al.  Computed tomography as a tool for non-destructive analysis of flow patterns in macroporous clay soils. , 1995 .

[31]  J. Bouma,et al.  Soil morphology and soil water movement. , 1987 .