The repeatability of the instrumented timed Up & Go test: The performance of older adults and parkinson’s disease patients under different conditions

Abstract The Timed Up & Go (TUG) test is a simple test for gait and balance that requires no special equipment and can be part of a routine clinical examination. Combined with the development of motion capture technologies, the possibilities of assessing individual TUG sub-components (i.e. sit-to-stand, gait, turn, turn-to-sit) are increasing. The clinical evaluation of an instrumented TUG requires reliable values. We analysed the intra-session repeatability of the iTUG sit-to-stand, gait and turn parameters in three conditions: (1) single, (2) cognitive dual-tasks, and (3) manual dual-tasks in older adults and Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. The repeatability coefficient (RC) was calculated for each of the 18 parameters. The repeatability varied across subject groups, the performed tasks, and the TUG subcomponent. The gait subcomponent had 6 non-repeatable spatio-temporal parameters and 2 non-repeatable parameters for the arm swing. The parameters of the turn subcomponent can be considered as non-repeatable in both groups under the manual dual-task condition and in HC under the single-task condition. When comparing PD to HC, the repeatability of the majority of the single-task parameters was higher in PD whereas lower under dual-tasks. In PD, the major part of gait parameters had a higher repeatability under single-tasks than dual-tasks. In contrast, HC exhibited better repeatability of dual-tasks than single-tasks. Repeatability can be used to assist researchers and clinicians to select adequate parameters with respect to the purpose of motion assessment.

[1]  Kamiar Aminian,et al.  Ambulatory Monitoring of Physical Activities in Patients With Parkinson's Disease , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Nigel Zheng,et al.  Reliability of the sub-components of the instrumented timed up and go test in ambulatory children with traumatic brain injury and typically developed controls. , 2018, Gait & posture.

[3]  D. Bowers,et al.  Does laterality of motor impairment tell us something about cognition in Parkinson disease? , 2009, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[4]  M. Woollacott,et al.  Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[5]  O. Tysnes,et al.  Autonomic and sensory symptoms and signs in incident, untreated Parkinson's disease: Frequent but mild , 2011, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[6]  Catherine Dehollain,et al.  Gait assessment in Parkinson's disease: toward an ambulatory system for long-term monitoring , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Gait variability and fall risk in community-living older adults: a 1-year prospective study. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Using a Body-Fixed Sensor to Identify Subclinical Gait Difficulties in Older Adults with IADL Disability: Maximizing the Output of the Timed Up and Go , 2013, PloS one.

[9]  Meg E Morris,et al.  Can people with Parkinson's disease improve dual tasking when walking? , 2010, Gait & posture.

[10]  J. Frank,et al.  Turning behavior in healthy older adults: Is there a preference for step versus spin turns? , 2010, Gait & posture.

[11]  S. Seino,et al.  Mobility performance tests for discriminating high risk of frailty in community-dwelling older women. , 2010, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[12]  Kamiar Aminian,et al.  Measurement of stand-sit and sit-stand transitions using a miniature gyroscope and its application in fall risk evaluation in the elderly , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Pamela W. Duncan,et al.  Special Series: Clinical Practice Guideline for the Prevention of Falls in Older Persons , 2022 .

[14]  Gina Sprint,et al.  Toward Automating Clinical Assessments: A Survey of the Timed Up and Go , 2015, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  S. Brauer,et al.  Does the type of concurrent task affect preferred and cued gait in people with Parkinson's disease? , 2005, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[16]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[17]  Mandy Miller Koop,et al.  Dual-task Interference Disrupts Parkinson’s Gait Across Multiple Cognitive Domains , 2018, Neuroscience.

[18]  Thomas Brandt,et al.  Increased gait variability is associated with the history of falls in patients with cerebellar ataxia , 2013, Journal of Neurology.

[19]  Lorenzo Chiari,et al.  ISway: a sensitive, valid and reliable measure of postural control , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[20]  J. Gracies,et al.  Long-term monitoring of gait in Parkinson's disease. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[21]  K. Takakusaki Functional Neuroanatomy for Posture and Gait Control , 2017, Journal of movement disorders.

[22]  A. Monsch,et al.  Identifying a cut-off point for normal mobility: a comparison of the timed 'up and go' test in community-dwelling and institutionalised elderly women. , 2003, Age and ageing.

[23]  A. Mitnitski,et al.  Impairments in mobility and balance in relation to frailty. , 2011, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[24]  Huiman X Barnhart,et al.  Applications of the repeatability of quantitative imaging biomarkers: a review of statistical analysis of repeat data sets. , 2009, Translational oncology.

[25]  Caroline Paquette,et al.  Reducing gait speed affects axial coordination of walking turns. , 2017, Gait & posture.

[26]  Orthopaedic Surgeons Panel On Falls Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Falls in Older Persons , 2001 .

[27]  C. Hass,et al.  A meta-analysis: Parkinson's disease and dual-task walking. , 2019, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[28]  E. Ferriolli,et al.  Dual-Task Performance: Influence of Frailty, Level of Physical Activity, and Cognition , 2019, Journal of geriatric physical therapy.

[29]  U S Nayak,et al.  Balance in elderly patients: the "get-up and go" test. , 1986, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[30]  D. Altman,et al.  Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies , 2003, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[31]  P. Tang,et al.  Motor dual‐task Timed Up & Go test better identifies prefrailty individuals than single‐task Timed Up & Go test , 2015, Geriatrics & gerontology international.

[32]  H. Akiyama,et al.  Compensatory turning strategies while walking in patients with hip osteoarthritis. , 2014, Gait & posture.

[33]  J C Wall,et al.  The Timed Get-up-and-Go test revisited: measurement of the component tasks. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[34]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  A training program to improve gait while dual tasking in patients with Parkinson's disease: a pilot study. , 2012, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[35]  James E. Graham,et al.  Relationship between test methodology and mean velocity in timed walk tests: a review. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[36]  C. Blake,et al.  The reliability of the quantitative timed up and go test (QTUG) measured over five consecutive days under single and dual-task conditions in community dwelling older adults. , 2016, Gait & posture.

[37]  Kamiar Aminian,et al.  The instrumented timed up and go test: potential outcome measure for disease modifying therapies in Parkinson's disease , 2009, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[38]  G. Borm,et al.  The effect of cognitive dual tasks on balance during walking in physically fit elderly people. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[39]  Kwan-Hwa Lin,et al.  Immediate Effects of Clock-Turn Strategy on the Pattern and Performance of Narrow Turning in Persons With Parkinson Disease , 2016, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[40]  J. Dingwell,et al.  Separating the effects of age and walking speed on gait variability. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[41]  Rose Anne Kenny,et al.  Using timed up-and-go to identify frail members of the older population. , 2013, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[42]  F. Horak,et al.  iTUG, a Sensitive and Reliable Measure of Mobility , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[43]  M. Woollacott,et al.  Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go Test. , 2000, Physical therapy.

[44]  Fay B. Horak,et al.  Instrumented balance and walking assessments in persons with multiple sclerosis show strong test-retest reliability , 2017, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[45]  L Nyberg,et al.  Attention, Frailty, and Falls: The Effect of a Manual Task on Basic Mobility , 1998, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[46]  L. Andrade,et al.  Cognition and dual-task performance in older adults with Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease , 2014, International journal of general medicine.

[47]  L. Shpinkova,et al.  Hyperfine field and induced moment of 181 Ta in the rare earth-iron Laves compounds , 1998 .