Effects of surface structure deformation on static friction at fractal interfaces

The evolution of fractal surface structures with flattening of asperities was investigated using isotropically roughened aluminium surfaces loaded in compression. It was found that asperity amplitude, mean roughness and fractal dimension decrease through increased compressive stress and number of loading events. Of the samples tested, surfaces subjected to an increased number of loading events exhibited the most significant surface deformation and were observed to exhibit higher levels of static friction at an interface with a single-crystal flat quartz substrate. This suggests that the frequency of grain reorganisation events in geomaterials plays an important role in the development of intergranular friction. Fractal surfaces were numerically modelled using Weierstrass– Mandelbrot-based functions. From the study of frictional interactions with rigid flat opposing surfaces it was apparent that the effect of surface fractal dimension is more significant with increasing dominance of adhesive mechanisms.

[1]  M. Coop,et al.  The influence of particle characteristics on the behaviour of coarse grained soils , 2010 .

[2]  B. Persson.  Relation between interfacial separation and load: a general theory of contact mechanics. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[3]  J. Greenwood,et al.  Contact of nominally flat surfaces , 1966, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[4]  Harrison,et al.  Molecular-dynamics simulations of atomic-scale friction of diamond surfaces. , 1992, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[5]  P. Sahoo,et al.  Elastic-plastic adhesive contact of rough surfaces with asymmetric distribution of asperity heights , 2008 .

[6]  F. Biscarini,et al.  The contact mechanics of fractal surfaces , 2003, Nature materials.

[7]  Abouzar Sadrekarimi,et al.  Critical state friction angle of sands , 2011 .

[8]  K. Komvopoulos,et al.  Contact analysis of elastic-plastic fractal surfaces , 1998 .

[9]  De’an Sun,et al.  Correlation of surface fractal dimension with frictional angle at critical state of sands , 2005 .

[10]  U. Landman,et al.  Nanotribology: friction, wear and lubrication at the atomic scale , 1995, Nature.

[11]  Robert L. Jackson,et al.  A fractal expansion of a three dimensional elastic–plastic multi-scale rough surface contact model , 2013 .

[12]  B. Persson.  Contact mechanics for randomly rough surfaces , 2006, cond-mat/0603807.

[13]  A. Majumdar,et al.  Fractal characterization and simulation of rough surfaces , 1990 .

[14]  M. Berry,et al.  On the Weierstrass-Mandelbrot fractal function , 1980, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[15]  Koichi Okuda,et al.  Calculation of the fractal dimensions of machined surface profiles , 1996 .

[16]  N. Yoshioka,et al.  Micromechanics of rock friction 2: Quantitative modeling of initial friction with contact theory , 1992 .

[17]  C. Sammis,et al.  Fractals, fault-gouge, and friction , 1989 .

[18]  F. P. Bowden,et al.  The Friction and Lubrication of Solids , 1964 .

[19]  Qunyang Li,et al.  Micromechanics of friction: effects of nanometre-scale roughness , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[20]  Xi-Qiao Feng,et al.  Adhesion-dependent negative friction coefficient on chemically modified graphite at the nanoscale. , 2012, Nature materials.