The cardiovascular effect of incretin-based therapies among type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the comparative cardiovascular safety of incretin-based therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library and www.clinicaltrials.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with duration≥12 weeks. Network meta-analysis was performed, followed by subgroup analysis and meta-regression. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system was used to assess the quality of evidence. The outcome of interest was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke and heart failure. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated as the measure of effect size. Results: 281 RCTs (76.9% double-blinded) with 180,000 patients were included, comparing incretin-based therapies with other six classes of anti-diabetic drugs or placebo. A statistically significant reduction in the risk of cardiovascular events was found in favour of GLP-1RAs when compared with placebo (OR 0.89, 95%CI: 0.80–0.99) and sulfonylurea (OR 0.76, 95%CI: 0.59–0.99), whereas DPP-4 inhibitors showed a neutral effect compared with placebo (OR 0.92, 95%CI: 0.83–1.01). Conclusions: Incretin-based therapies show similar cardiovascular risk in comparison with metformin, insulin, thiazolidinediones, alpha-glucosidase inhibitor and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2. GLP-1RA could decrease the risk compared with sulfonylurea or placebo, while DPP-4I appears to have neutral effect on cardiovascular risk.

[1]  Neha J. Pagidipati,et al.  Effects of Once‐Weekly Exenatide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  T. Hansen,et al.  Effects of liraglutide on cardiovascular risk biomarkers in patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria: A sub‐analysis of a randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind, crossover trial , 2017, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[3]  M. Mohseni,et al.  Liraglutide causes large and rapid epicardial fat reduction , 2017, Obesity.

[4]  G. Li Volti,et al.  Liraglutide improves metabolic parameters and carotid intima-media thickness in diabetic patients with the metabolic syndrome: an 18-month prospective study , 2016, Cardiovascular Diabetology.

[5]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Effect of Saxagliptin on Renal Outcomes in the SAVOR-TIMI 53 Trial , 2016, Diabetes Care.

[6]  A. Jacquier,et al.  Exenatide decreases liver fat content and epicardial adipose tissue in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes: a prospective randomized clinical trial using magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy , 2016, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[7]  S. Rajagopalan,et al.  The Present and FutureReview Topic of the WeekIncretin-Based Therapy for Diabetes: What a Cardiologist Needs to Know , 2016 .

[8]  S. Bolen,et al.  The safety of incretin based drug treatments for type 2 diabetes , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[9]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and risk of heart failure in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and observational studies , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[10]  M. Nauck,et al.  Incretin therapies: highlighting common features and differences in the modes of action of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors , 2016, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[11]  S. Solomon,et al.  Lixisenatide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  Anna Chaimani,et al.  Visualizing Assumptions and Results in Network Meta-analysis: The Network Graphs Package , 2015 .

[13]  M. Stumvoll,et al.  Cardiovascular and heart failure safety profile of vildagliptin: a meta‐analysis of 17 000 patients , 2015, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[14]  D. Reda,et al.  Follow-up of glycemic control and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  W. Cushman,et al.  Heart failure and mortality outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes taking alogliptin versus placebo in EXAMINE: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[16]  J. Rosenstock,et al.  Cardiovascular safety of linagliptin in type 2 diabetes: a comprehensive patient-level pooled analysis of prospectively adjudicated cardiovascular events , 2015, Cardiovascular Diabetology.

[17]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Glucose-lowering drugs or strategies and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with or at risk for type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. , 2015, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[18]  J. Buse,et al.  Cardiovascular safety of the glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist taspoglutide in people with type 2 diabetes: an individual participant data meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2015, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[19]  L. Pani,et al.  Cardiovascular effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in diabetic patients: A meta-analysis. , 2015, International journal of cardiology.

[20]  Spiros Denaxas,et al.  Type 2 diabetes and incidence of cardiovascular diseases: a cohort study in 1·9 million people , 2015, The Lancet.

[21]  L. Rydén,et al.  Intensified insulin-based glycaemic control after myocardial infarction: mortality during 20 year follow-up of the randomised Diabetes Mellitus Insulin Glucose Infusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction (DIGAMI 1) trial. , 2014, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[22]  Anna Chaimani,et al.  Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis , 2014, PloS one.

[23]  M. Monami,et al.  Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. , 2014, Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD.

[24]  H. Krum,et al.  Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and cardiovascular outcomes: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials with 55,141 participants. , 2014, Cardiovascular therapeutics.

[25]  S. Agarwal,et al.  Meta-Analysis of the Cardiovascular Outcomes with Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors: Validation of the Current FDA Mandate , 2014, American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs.

[26]  M. Monami,et al.  Effects of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists on cardiovascular risk: a meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials , 2014, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[27]  R. Califf,et al.  Rationale, design, and organization of a randomized, controlled Trial Evaluating Cardiovascular Outcomes with Sitagliptin (TECOS) in patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease. , 2013, American heart journal.

[28]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Baseline characteristics of the patient population in the Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in patients with diabetes mellitus (SAVOR)‐TIMI 53 trial , 2013, Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews.

[29]  W. White,et al.  Cardiovascular safety of the dipetidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor alogliptin in type 2 diabetes mellitus , 2013, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[30]  M. Monami,et al.  Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors and cardiovascular risk: a meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials , 2013, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[31]  Y. Zhang,et al.  Cardiovascular safety and glycemic control of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pairwise and network meta-analysis. , 2012, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[32]  AE Ades,et al.  Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies‡ , 2012, Research synthesis methods.

[33]  Georgia Salanti,et al.  Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool , 2012, Research synthesis methods.

[34]  J. Buse,et al.  Cardiovascular safety of liraglutide assessed in a patient-level pooled analysis of phase 2—3 liraglutide clinical development studies , 2011, Diabetes & vascular disease research.

[35]  J. Yudkin,et al.  Intensified glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes: time for a reappraisal , 2010, Diabetologia.

[36]  I. Olkin,et al.  Why add anything to nothing? The arcsine difference as a measure of treatment effect in meta‐analysis with zero cells , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[37]  J. Higgins,et al.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration , 2013 .

[38]  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Edited by Julian P. T. Higgins & , 2006 .

[39]  N. Iqbal,et al.  O R I G I N a L I N V E S T I G a T I O N Open Access , 2022 .